Pastoral Psychology

, Volume 45, Issue 3, pp 163–179 | Cite as

The Bible and psychology: New directions in biblical scholarship

  • Wayne G. Rollins
Article

Abstract

Part One, “Historical Retrospect on the Bible and Psychology,” documents the development of psychological biblical criticism as an emerging discipline within biblical studies since the 1960's. Part Two, “An Agenda for the Bible and Psychology,” advances a definition of the goal of psychological biblical criticism, enumerating ten areas of research: (a) recognizing the biblical text and biblical interpretation as part of a psychic process in which conscious as well as unconscious factors are at work; (b) meta-rational dimensions of hermeneutics; (c) the psychological polyvalence of biblical symbols; (d) the archetypal depth of biblical images and stories; (e) levels of meaning a text can evoke in readers and different modes of “actualizing” a text; (f) psycho-dynamic factors at work in biblical texts; (g) psychological insight into biblical personality characterizations and types; (h) the psychological description and analysis of biblical religious phenomena; (i) psycho-critical analysis of biblical “effects” as part of “biblical history;” (j) the reclamation of “biblical psychology” as a rubric in biblical scholarship, in conversation with models of the self in the psychological disciplines.

Keywords

Cross Cultural Psychology Biblical Study Historical Retrospect Biblical Scholarship Biblical Criticism 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams, J. (1976).The uses of Scripture in counseling. Phillipsburg, NJ: Presbyterian and Reformed.Google Scholar
  2. Adler, G. & Jaffé, A. (Eds.). (1973).C. G. Jung letters, I: 1906–1950. Hull, R. F. C. (trans.). Princeton: Princeton.Google Scholar
  3. Adler, G. & Jaffé, A. (Eds.). (1975).C. G. Jung letters, II: 1951–1961. Hull, R. F. C. (trans.). Princeton: Princeton.Google Scholar
  4. Anderson, B. W. (1986).Understanding the Old Testament. 4th ed. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  5. Buss, M. J. (1965). Self-theory and theology.Journal of Religion, xlv (1), 46–53.Google Scholar
  6. Callan, T. (1990).Psychological perspectives on the life of Paul. An application of the methodology of Gerd Theissen. Lewiston: Edwin Mellen.Google Scholar
  7. Capps, D. (1981).Biblical approaches to pastoral counseling. Philadelphia: Westminster.Google Scholar
  8. Capps, D. (1984). The Bible's role in pastoral care and counseling: Four basic principles.Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 3 (4), 5–15.Google Scholar
  9. Capps, D. (1990). Bible, pastoral use and interpretation of. In R. Hunter (Ed.),Dictionary of Pastoral Care and Counseling (pp. 82–85). Nashville: Abingdon.Google Scholar
  10. Capps, D. (1995).The child's song: The religious abuse of children. Westminster: John Knox.Google Scholar
  11. Collins, A. Y. (1984).Crisis and catharsis: The power of the Apocalypse. Philadelphia: Westminster.Google Scholar
  12. Crossan, J. D. (1977). Perspectives and methods in contemporary biblical criticism.Biblical Research, 22, 29–49.Google Scholar
  13. Delitzsch, F. (1966).A system of biblical psychology. Wallis, A E. (trans.). 2nd Edition. Grand Rapids: Baker. The original appeared asSystem der biblischen Psychologie. Leipzig: Dörffling & Franke, 1867; first English translation, Edinburgh: T & T Clark, 1869.Google Scholar
  14. Dittes, J. E. (1990). Analytical (Jungian) psychology and pastoral care. In R. Hunter (Ed.),Dictionary of Pastoral Care and Counseling (pp. 29–33). Nashville: Abingdon.Google Scholar
  15. Dolto, F., & Sévérin, G. (1979).The Jesus of psychoanalysis: A Freudian interpretation of the gospel. Lane, H. R. (trans.). New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  16. Drewermann, E. (1984a).Tiefenpsychologie und exegese: Die wahrheit der formen: Traum, mythos, mÄrchen, sage, und legende. Olten/Freiburg: Walter.Google Scholar
  17. Drewermann, E. (1984b).Tiefenpsychologie und exegese: Die wahrheit der werke und der worte: Wunder, vision, Weissagung, apokalypse, geschickte, gleichnis. Olten/Freiburg: Walter.Google Scholar
  18. Fitzmyer, J. A., Fitzmyer, S. J. (1994).Scripture, the soul of theology. NY: Paulist.Google Scholar
  19. Fletcher, M. S. (1912).The psychology of the New Testament (2nd ed.). NY: Hodder & Stoughton.Google Scholar
  20. Grant, F. C. (1968). Psychological study of the Bible. In J. Neusner (Ed),Religions in Antiquity: Essays in Memory of Erwin Ramsdell Goodenough (pp. 107–124). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  21. Greven, P. (1991).Spare the child: The religious roots of punishment and the psychological impact of physical abuse. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  22. Halperin, D. J. (1993).Seeking Ezekiel, text and psychology. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University.Google Scholar
  23. Hurding, R. F. (1988).The tree of healing: Psychological and biblical foundations for counseling and pastoral care. Grand Rapids: Zondervan.Google Scholar
  24. Jung, C. G. (1953–78).The collected works of C. G. Jung. Princeton: Princeton University.Google Scholar
  25. Kille, D. A. (1995). Jacob—A study in individuation. In D. L. Miller (Ed.),Jung and the interpretation of the Bible (pp. 40–54). NY: Continuum.Google Scholar
  26. Kümmel, W. G. (1972).The New Testament: The history of the investigation of its problems. Gilmour, S. M. and Kee, H. C. (trans.). Nashville: Abingdon.Google Scholar
  27. Luz, U. (1994).Matthew in history: Interpretation, influence, and effects. Minneapolis: Fortress.Google Scholar
  28. Meyer, S. G. (1974). The Psalms and personal counseling.Journal of Psychology and Theology, 2 (1), 26–30.Google Scholar
  29. Miles, J. (1995). Jesus before he could talk.The New York Times Magazine, December 24, 1995, 28–33.Google Scholar
  30. Miller, D. L., (Ed.). (1995).Jung and the interpretation of the bible. NY: Continuum.Google Scholar
  31. Nicole, A. (1924/1957).Judas the betrayer A psychological study of Judas Iscariot. Grand Rapids: Baker Book House.Google Scholar
  32. Oates, W. E. (1950). The diagnostic use of the Bible: What a man sees in the Bible is a projection of his inner self.Pastoral Psychology, 1, 43–46.Google Scholar
  33. Oates, W. E. (1953).The Bible in pastoral care. Philadelphia: Westminster.Google Scholar
  34. Oglesby, W. B., Jr. (1980).Biblical themes for pastoral care. Nashville: Abingdon.Google Scholar
  35. Pontifical Biblical Commission. (1993).The interpretation of the Bible in the church. Vatican City: Libreria Editrice Vaticana.Google Scholar
  36. Robinson, H. W. (1946).Inspiration and revelation in the Old Testament. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  37. Rollins, W. G. (1983).Jung and the Bible. Atlanta: John Knox.Google Scholar
  38. Rollins, W. G. (1987). Jung's challenge to biblical hermeneutics. In M. Stein & R. L. Moore (Eds.),Jung's challenge to contemporary religion (pp. 107–125). Peru, IL: Chiron.Google Scholar
  39. Rollins, W. G. (1995). Psychology, Hermeneutics, and the Bible. In D. L. Miller (Ed.),Jung and the interpretation of the Bible (pp. 9–39). New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  40. Sanday, W. (1911).Personality in Christ and in ourselves. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  41. Sanford, J. A. (1985).King Saul, The tragic hero: A study in individuation. NY: Paulist.Google Scholar
  42. Scharfenberg, J. (1988).Sigmund Freud and his critique of religion. Dean, O. C., Jr. (trans.). Philadelphia: Fortress.Google Scholar
  43. Schweitzer, A. (1913).The psychiatric study of Jesus. Joy, C. R. (trans.). Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
  44. Scroggs, R. (1977).Paul for a new day. Philadelphia: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
  45. Scroggs, R. (1982). Psychology as a tool to interpret the text: Emerging trends in biblical thoughtChristian Century (March 24), 335–8.Google Scholar
  46. Smith, W. C. (1971). The study of religion and the study of the Bible.Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 39, 131–40.Google Scholar
  47. Stein, M. & Moore, R. (Eds.). (1987).Jung's challenge to contemporary religion. Wilmette, IL: Chiron.Google Scholar
  48. Taylor, V. (1959).The Person of Christ in New Testament teaching. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  49. Theissen, G. (1987).Psychological aspects of Pauline theology. Galvin, J. P. (trans.). Philadelphia: Fortress.Google Scholar
  50. Tolbert, M. A. (1979).Perspectives on the parables: An approach to multiple interpretations. Philadelphia: Fortress.Google Scholar
  51. Van de Kemp, H. (1984). Psychologies of Jesus. InPsychology and theology in Western thought, 1672–1965: A historical and annotated bibliography.Bibliographies in the history of psychology and psychiatry, A Series (pp. 69–73). Millwood, NY: Kraus International.Google Scholar
  52. Vergote, A. (1988).Guilt and desire: Religious attitudes and their pathological derivatives. Wood, M. H. (trans.). New Haven: Yale University.Google Scholar
  53. Williams, J. G. (1995).The Bible, violence, and the sacred: Liberation from the myth of sanctioned violence. Valley Forge, PA: Trinity International.Google Scholar
  54. Wink, W. (1973).The Bible in human transformation: Toward a new pradigm for biblical study. Philadelphia: Fortress.Google Scholar
  55. Wink, W. (1978). On wrestling with God: Using psychological insights in biblical study.Religion in Life, 47, 136–47.Google Scholar
  56. Wink, W. (1989).Transforming Bible study: A leader's guide (2nd Revised ed.). Nashville: Abingdon.Google Scholar
  57. Wise, C. A. (1956).Psychiatry and the Bible. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  58. Wrede, W. (1901).Das messiasgeheimnis in den evangelien. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
  59. Wuellner, W. & Leslie, R.C. (1984).The surprising gospel: Intriguing psychological insights from the New Testament. Nashville: Abingdon.Google Scholar
  60. Zeligs, D. (1974).Psychoanalysis and the Bible: A study in depth of seven leaders. New York: Bloch.Google Scholar
  61. Zeligs, D. (1986).Moses: A psychodynamic study. New York: Human Sciences Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wayne G. Rollins
    • 1
  1. 1.Worcester

Personalised recommendations