Skip to main content
Log in

A study ofB-convergence of linearly implicit Runge-Kutta methods

Eine Analyse derB-Konvergenz linear impliziter Runge-Kutta-Methoden

  • Published:
Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper deals withB-convergence analysis of linearly implicit Runge-Kutta methods as applied to stiff, semilinear problems of the formy′(t)=Ty(t)+g(t,y). We analyse the discrepancy between the local and global order reduction. We show that linearly implicit Runge-Kutta methods ofB-consistency orderq have theB-convergence orderq+1 for many singularly perturbed problems with constant stiff part. Numerical examples illustrate the theoretical results.

Zusammenfassung

Die Arbeit befaßt sich mitB-Konvergenzuntersuchungen linear impliziter Runge-Kutta-Verfahren, angewandt auf steife semilineare Differentialgleichungen der Gestalty′(t)=Ty(t)+g(t,y). Es wird die Diskrepanz zwischen lokaler und globaler Ordnungsreduktion analysiert. Wir zeigen, daß linear implizite Runge-Kutta-Methoden derB-Konvergenzordnungq für eine gewisse Klasse singulär gestörter Probleme mit konstant steifem Anteil dieB-Konvergenzordnungq+1 besitzt. Numerische Beispiele bestätigen die theoretischen Resultate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Burrage, K., Hundsdorfer, W. H., Verwer, J. G.: A study of B-convergence of Runge-Kutta methods. Computing36, 17–34 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Collatz, L.: Functional Analysis and Numerical Mathematics, New York-San Francisco-London: Academic Press 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dekker, K., Verwer, J. G.: Stability of Runge-Kutta Methods for Stiff Nolinear Differential Equations. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publ. Co. 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dekker, K., Kraaijevanger, J. F. B. M., Spijker, M. N.: The order of B-convergence of the Gaussian Runge-Kutta methods. Computing36, 35–41 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Frank, R., Schneid, J., Ueberhuber, C. W.: The concept of B-convergence. SIAM J. Numer. Anal.18, 753–780 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hairer, E., Bader, G., Lubich, Ch.: On the stability of semi-implicit methods for ordinary differential equations. BIT22, 211–232 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hundsdorfer, W. H.: Stability and B-convergence of linearly implicit Runge-Kutta methods. Numer. Math.50, 83–95 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kraaijevanger, J. F. B. M.: B-convergence of the implicit midpoint rule and the trapezoidal rule. BIT25, 652–666 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Stetter, H. J.: Zur B-Konvergenz der impliziten Trapez- und Mittelpunktregel (unpublished note).

  10. Strehmel, K., Weiner, R.: B-convergence results for linearly implicit one step methods. BIT27, 264–281 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Strehmel, K., Weiner, R.: Partitioned adaptive Runge-Kutta methods and their stability. Numer. Math.45, 283–300 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ström, T.: On logarithmic norms. SIAM J. Numer. Anal.12, 741–753 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Strehmel, K., Weiner, R. & Dannehl, I. A study ofB-convergence of linearly implicit Runge-Kutta methods. Computing 40, 241–253 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02251252

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02251252

Mathematical Subject Classification

Key words

Navigation