Skip to main content
Log in

Cost-effectiveness analysis of health care services, and concepts of distributive justice

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Health Care Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript


Two answers to the question ‘how can we allocate health care resources fairly?’ are introduced and discussed. Both utilitarian and egalitarian approaches are found relevant, but both exhibit considerable theoretical and practical difficulties. Neither seems capable of solving the problem on its own. It is suggested that, for practical purposes, a version of Rawls' famous thought experiment might provide at least some enlightenment about which theoretical approach should be used to address the question.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others


  1. Drummond, M. F. (1990). Allocating resources.International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 6(1), 77–92.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Luce, B. R. and Elixhauser, A. (1990). Estimating costs in the economic evaluation of medical technologies.International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 6(1), 57–75.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Danis, M. and Churchill, L. R. (1991). Autonomy and the common wealth.Hastings Center Report 21(1), 25–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Loughlin, M. (1993). The strange quest for the health gain.Health Care Analysis 1(2), 165–169.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hogwood, B. W. and Gunn, L. A. (1984).Policy Analysis for the Real World, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Elster, J. (1992).Local Justice. How Institutions Allocate Scarce Goods and Necessary Burdens, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Daniels, N. (1985).Just Health Care, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Daniels, N. (1993). Rationing fairly: programmatic considerations.Bioethics 7, 224–233.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gaskins, R. H. (1992).Burdens of Proof in Modern Discourse, Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hart, H. L. A. (1961).The Concept of Law, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Schön, D. (1983).The Reflective Practitioner. How Professionals Think in Action, Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Brennan, J. M. (1977).The Open-Texture of Moral Concepts, MacMillan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Arrington, R. L. (1989).Rationalism, Realism and Relativism. Perspectives in Contemporary Moral Epistemology, Cornell University Press, Ithaca.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rawls, J. (1971).A Theory of Justice, Oxford University Press, Oxford. (Eighth impression, 1988.)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Brannigan, M. (1993). Oregon's Experiment.Health Care Analysis 1(1), 15–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van der Wilt, G.J. Cost-effectiveness analysis of health care services, and concepts of distributive justice. Health Care Anal 2, 296–305 (1994).

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: