Health Care Analysis

, Volume 2, Issue 4, pp 273–278 | Cite as

AIDS, science and the totem

  • David Seedhouse
Editorial

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Fitzpatrick, M. and Milligan, D. (1987).The Truth about the AIDS Panic, Junius Publications Ltd., London.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Stewart, G. T. (1994). Scientific surveillance and the control of AIDS: a call for open debate.Health Care Analysis 2(4), 279–286.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Caton, H. (1994). Alternative models of the AIDS epidemic.Health Care Analysis 2(4), 351–355.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Schüklenk, U. (1994). HIV and the causes of AIDS—a flat earther's view.PWALIVE Magazine,5(3), 7–9, Minneapolis, USA.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ho, D. D., Yunzhen, C., Tuofu, Z.et al. (1993). Idiopathic CD4+ T-Lymphocytopenia-immuno-deficiency without evidence of HIV infection.New England Journal of Medicine 328(6), 380–385.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Plumridge, E. and Chetwynd, J. (1994). AIDS policy response in New Zealand: consensus in crisis.Health Care Analysis 2(4), 288–296.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pascal, L. (1991). What happens when science goes bad.Science and Technology Working Paper No.9, Department of Science and Technology Studies, University of Wollongong, NSW, Australia.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Koestler, A. (1979).Janus: A Summing Up, Pan Books Ltd., London.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Maclean, P. D. (1962). Quoted in8.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Seedhouse

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations