Skip to main content
Log in

Socialization for the democratic personality in modern society

  • Published:
Journal of Adult Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A comprehensive analysis of socialization requires a complex model that both explicates and synthesizes the various subprocesses involved in this phenomenon. Traditional concerns with socialization that have focused almost exclusively on its objective functions, that is, on those which serve society and its institutions, need to be complemented by an equal emphasis on subjective functions in terms of the sociological and psychological development of the individual. Chiefly relevant in this latter respect is the production of basic human needs and the consequences that result from their inadequate gratification in unauthentic and/or unresponsive societies. One such outcome that is particularly crucial to both personal and societal function is that of alienation, which can be assessed specifically in terms of its significance for civic participation. Our model recognizes the limits of both human systems and social systems; and, in terms of the principles of authenticity and responsivity, it articulates the linkage among these systems constituting the essence of socialization. Our model also provides an implicit clarification of the nature and meaning of citizenship in a democracy, which by definition should be a responsive society, and delineates the required sociopsychological images for maximizing the role of political participation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Almond, G. (1977). Youth character and changing political culture. In G. J. DiRenzo (Ed.),We, the people: American character and social change (pp. 115–146). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adorno, T. N., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D. J., & Sanford, N. R. (1950).The authoritarian personality. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P. L., Berger, B., & Kellner, H. (1973).The homeless mind. New York: Vintage Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1974). The origins of alienation.Scientific American, 21, 53–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiRenzo, G. J. (1974).Personality and politics. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiRenzo, G. J. (1977). Socialization, personality, and social systems.Annual Review of Sociology, 3, 261–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiRenzo, G. J. (1990a). Socialization for citizenship in modern democratic society. In O. Ichilov (Ed.),Political socialization for democracy (pp. 25–46). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiRenzo, G. J. (1990b).Human social behavior: Concepts and principles of sociology. Fort Worth, TX: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiRenzo, G. J. (1994).The social individual. Lexington, MA: Ginn Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, A. (1968). Basic human needs, alienation, and inauthenticity.American Sociological Review, 32, 870–885.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, A. (1977). Basic characterological needs and changing social systems. In G. J. DiRenzo (Ed.),We, the people: American character and social change (pp. 273–284). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fromm, E. (1941).Escape from freedom. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fromm, E. (1944). The individual and social origins of neurosis.American Sociological Review, 9, 380–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inkeles, A. (1961). National character and modern political systems. In F. L. K. Hsu (Ed.),Psychological anthropology (pp. 172–208). Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Israel, J. (1971).Alienation: From Marx to modern society. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, R. (1962).Political ideology. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipset, S. M. (1960).Political man. New York: William Heineman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milbrath, L., & Klein, W. W. (1962). Personality correlates of political participation.Acta sociologica, 6, 52–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shils, E. A. (1954). Authoritarianism: ‘Right’ and ‘Left.’ In R. Christie & M. Jahoda (Eds.),Studies in the scope and method of the authoritarian personality (pp. 24–49). Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, W. I., & Znaniecki, F. (1918).The Polish peasant in Europe and America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turkle, S. (1984).The second self: Computers and the human spirit. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrong, D. (1961). The oversocialized conception of man in modern sociology.American Sociological Review, 26, 183–193.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

DiRenzo, G.J. Socialization for the democratic personality in modern society. J Adult Dev 2, 275–281 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02251042

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02251042

Key words

Navigation