Journal of Adult Development

, Volume 2, Issue 4, pp 265–273 | Cite as

Individual experience and paradox in the development of small groups

  • Judith Stevens-Long
  • Candido Trujillo
Article
  • 31 Downloads

Abstract

This study attempts to understand individual emotional experience in the context of group development. It emphasizes the first level of abstraction of group member experience rather than individual experience over time through second-order interpretations. Data were gathered from mixed groups of 21 students, over 9 weeks, in a group process course at a large state university. Students had no prior group process training and kept weekly journals for credit. Content analysis was performed on the journals, meaning units were coded for theme, and frequencies of themes describing affective and traditional group process responses were tallied. The data clearly supported the paradoxical descriptions of group life, especially conflict, offered by Smith and Berg (1988). The data may also represent what the move toward relativistic (Sinnott, 1984) or dialectical (Riegel, 1975, 1977) thinking may look like at the individual level.

Key words

Group dynamics group paradox emotional development individual development conflict 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ashforth, B. E., & Humphrey, R. H. (1995). Emotion in the workplace: A reappraisal.Human Relations, 48, 97–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bennis, W. G., & Shepard, H. A. (1956). A theory of group development. In L. P. Bradford, J. R. Gibb, & K. D. Benne (Eds.),T-group theory and laboratory method. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  3. Berscheid, E. (1982). Attraction and emotion in interpersonal relations. In M. S. Clark & S. T. Fiske (Eds.),Affect and cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  4. Bion, W. (1961).Experiences in groups. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  5. Brenner, M. (1988).House of dreams: The Bingham family of Louisville. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  6. Burrough, B., & Helyar, J. (1990).Barbarians at the gate: The fall of RJR Nabisco. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  7. Frey, L. R. (1994). The naturalistic paradigm: Studying small groups in the postmodern era.Small Group Research, 25, 551–577.Google Scholar
  8. Goleman, D. (1995).Emotional intelligence. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
  9. Hatfield, E. (1988). Passionate and compassionate love. In R. J. Sternberg & M. L. Brown (Eds.),The Psychology of Love. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Hoyle, R. H., & Crawford, A. M. (1994). Use of individual-level data to investigate group phenomena: Issues and strategies.Small Group Research, 25, 464–485.Google Scholar
  11. Leventhal, H. (1982). The integration of emotion and cognition: A view from the perceptual-motor theory of emotion. In M. S. Clark & S. T. Fiske (Eds.),Affect and cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  12. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985).Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  13. Mandler, G. (1982). The structure of value: Accounting for taste. In M. S. Clark & S. T. Fiske (Eds.),Affect and cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  14. Mainiero, L. A. (1986). A review and analysis of power dynamics in organizational romances.Academy of Management Review, 11, 750–762.Google Scholar
  15. Plas, J. M., & Hoover-Dempsey, K. V. (1988)Working up a storm: Anger, anxiety, joy, and tears on the job. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  16. Riegel, K. F. (1973). Dialectic operations: The final period of cognitive development.Human Development, 16, 346–370.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Riegel, K. F. (1975). From traits and equilibrium toward developmental dialectics. In W. J. Arnold & J. K. Cole (Eds.),Life-span developmental psychology: Normative life crises. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  18. Riegel, K. F. (1977) History of psychological gerontology. In J. E. Birren & K. W. Schaie (Eds.),Handbook of the psychology of aging. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
  19. Sinnott, J. D. (1984). Postformal reasoning: The relativistic stage. In M. L. Commons, F. A. Richards, & C. Armon (Eds.),Beyond formal operations, Vol. 1: Late adolescent and adult cognitive development. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  20. Slater, P. (1966).Microcosm. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  21. Smith, K., & Berg, D. (1988).Paradoxes of group life. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  22. Stevens-Long, J. (1990). Adult development: Theories past and future. In R. A. Nemiroff & C. A. Colarusso (Eds.),New dimensions in adult development (pp. 125–164). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  23. Stevens-Long, J., & Macdonald, S. (1992a). Empathy, cognitive generativity, and parenting. In J. Demick (Ed.),Adult development and parenting (pp. 89–106). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  24. Stevens-Long, J., & Macdonald, S. (1992b, June).Conflict, cognitive development and group process. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Society for Research in Adult Development, Toronto, Ontario.Google Scholar
  25. Stock, D., & Thelen, H. (1958).Emotional dynamics and group culture. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Time. (1995). “Redefining what it means to be smart.” October 2, pp. 60–66.Google Scholar
  27. Tuckman, B. W. (1965). Developmental sequence in small groups.Psychological Bulletin, 63, 384–399.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Verdi, A. F., & Wheelan, S. A. (1992). Developmental patterns in same-sex and mixed-sex groups.Small Group Research, 23, 257–378.Google Scholar
  29. Wheelan, S. A., & McKeage, R. L. (1993). Developmental patterns in small and large groups.Small Group Research, 24, 60–83.Google Scholar
  30. Worchel, S. (1994). You can go home again: Returning group research to the group context with an eye on developmental issues.Small Group Research, 25, 205–223.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Judith Stevens-Long
    • 1
  • Candido Trujillo
    • 1
  1. 1.The Fielding InstituteWashington

Personalised recommendations