Skip to main content
Log in

A crop-weather analysis model applied to field bean

  • Published:
International Journal of Biometeorology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Daily contributions to the final yields were estimated by means of a second order response surface model. The combination of an energy, a temperature and a water state term showed the greatest coefficient of determination. The particular effect on the seed yield of insolation expressed as hours of bright sunshine, was positive from emergence to the ripening period, when no water stress was present. By water stress increasing hours of bright sunshine affected the seed yield negatively. The effect of night temperature was negative though small during the whole life cycle. The haulm yield was negatively affected by increasing insolation during the flowering phase. During the ripening phase a curvilinear effect with an optimum about 8 to 9 hours of bright sunshine was evident. From emergence to first flowering rising night temperature increased yield. During flowering and ripening a curvilinear effect with optimum from 12 to 15°C appeared.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • BAIER, W. (1973): Crop-Weather analysis model: Review and model development. J. appl. Meteor. 12: 937–947.

    Google Scholar 

  • CLAUS, S. und UNGER, K. (1965): Zum quantitativen Vergleich der Ertragsbildung verschiedener Sorten. Züchter, 35: 41–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • COOPER, A. J. (1973): Root temperature and plant growth. Commonw. Bur. Hort. Plant. Crops, Res. Rev. 4, 73 pp.

  • CRAFTS, A. S. (1968): Water deficits and physiological processes. pp. 85–133 in Water deficits and plant growth. T. T. Kozlowski (ed.). Vol. II. Plant water consumption and response. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • MYERS, R. H. (1971): Response surface methodology. Allyn and Bacon, Boston. 246 pp.

  • OTTESTAD, P. (1975): Component analysis: an alternative system. Int. Stat. Rev., 43: 83–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • ROBERTSON, G. W. (1968): A biometeorological time scale for a cereal crop involving day and night temperatures and photoperiod. Int. J. Biometeor., 12: 191–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • ROBERTSON, G. W. (1974): Wheat yields for 50 years at Swift Current, Saskatchewan in relation to weather. Canad. J. Plant Sci. 54: 625–650.

    Google Scholar 

  • SALTER, P. J. and GOODE, J. E. (1967): Crop responses to water at different stages of growth. Commonw. Bur. Hort. Plant. Crops. Res. Rev. 2, 246 pp.

  • STANHILL, G. (1977): Quantifying weather-crop relations. In: J. J. Landsberg and C. V. Cutting (ed.) Environmental effects on crop physiology. Academic Press, London, 23–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • STOKER, R. (1974): Effect on dwarf beans of water stress at different phases of growth. N.Z.J. exp. Agric., 2: 13–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNGER, K. (1966): Quantitative Analysen der Ertragsbildung in der Züchtungsforschung. Dtsch. Akad. Landwirtsch. Wiss. No. 82, Teil II, 43–60.

  • WARDLAW, I. F. (1968): The control and pattern of movement of carbohydrates in plants. Bot. Rev., 34: 79–105.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Skjelvåg, A.O. A crop-weather analysis model applied to field bean. Int J Biometeorol 24, 301–313 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02250572

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02250572

Keywords

Navigation