Motivation and Emotion

, Volume 19, Issue 3, pp 175–191 | Cite as

Physicians' Reactions to Uncertainty: Refining the constructs and scales

  • Martha S. Gerrity
  • Kinnard P. White
  • Robert F. DeVellis
  • Robert S. Dittus

Abstract

The Physicians' Reactions to Uncertainty (PRU) scales were developed to measure physicians' affective reactions to uncertainty. However, the structural (factor) model for the two PRU scales has not been cross validated on an independent sample of physicians. We surveyed 337 physicians in internal medicine at Indiana University to test the structural model for the PRU scales using confirmatory factor analysis and, if necessary, to refine the constructs and scales. The structural model of the original PRU scales did not fit the data (X2=559.26,p<.001) provided by the 265 (79%) respondents. Based on models suggested by 15 volunteers, we refined the constructs and scales. The four new scales are Anxiety Due to Uncertainty (five items,α=.85), Concern about Bad Outcomes (three items,α=.74), Reluctance to Disclose Uncertainty to Patients (five items,α=.76), and Reluctance to Disclose Mistakes to Physicians (two items,α=.75). The revised structural models have greater conceptual clarity, better fit to the data, and shorter scale measures than the original PRU model.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baldwin, B. (1989). A primer in the use and interpretation of structural equation models.Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 22, 100–112.Google Scholar
  2. Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness-of-fit in the analysis of covariance structures.Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bollen, K. A. (1988).A new incremental fix index for general structural equation models. Paper presented at 1988 Southern Sociological Society Meeting, Nashville, TN.Google Scholar
  4. Bollen, K. A. (1989).Structural equations with latent variables. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  5. Bollen, K. A., & Lennox, R. (1991). Conventional wisdom on measurement: A structural equation perspective.Psychological Bulletin 110, 305–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bosk, C. L. (1979).Forgive and remember: Managing medical failure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bosk, C. L. (1980). Occupational rituals in patient management.New England Journal of Medicine, 303, 71–76.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bosk, C. L. (1986). Professional responsibility and medical error. In L. H. Aiken & D. Mechanic (Eds.),Applications of social science to clinical medicine and health policy (pp. 460–477). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bowers, C. A. (1987).The promise of theory: Education and the politics of cultural change. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  10. Brook, R. H., Lohr, K. N., Chassin, M. R., Kosecoff, J., Fink, A., & Solomon, D. (1984). Geographic variations in the use of services: Do they have any clinical significance?Health Affairs, 3, 63–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Browne, M. W. (1974). Generalized least squares estimators in the analysis of covariance structures.South African Statistical Journal, 8, 1–24.Google Scholar
  12. Browne, M. W. (1984). Asymptotically distribution-free methods for the analysis of covariance structures.British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 37, 62–83.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Connell, F. A., Day, R. W., & LoGerfo, J. P. (1981). Hospitalization of Medicaid children: Analysis of small area variations in admission rates.American Journal of Public Health, 71, 606.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Davis, F. (1960). Uncertainty in medical prognosis: Clinical and functional.American Journal of Sociology, 66, 41–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Eddy, D. M. (1984). Variations in physician practice: The role of uncertainty.Health Affairs, 4, 74–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Eddy, D. M., & Billings, J. (1988). The quality of medical evidence: Implications for quality of care.Health Affairs, 7, 19–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Fox, R. C. (1957). Training for uncertainty. In R. Merton, G. C. Reader, & P. Kendall (Eds.),The student-physician: Introductory studies in the sociology of medical education (pp. 207–241). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Gerrity, M. S., DeVellis, R. F., & Earp, J. A. (1990). Physicians reactions to uncertainty in patient care: A new measure and new insights.Medical Care, 28, 724–736.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Gerrity, M. S., Earp, J. A., DeVellis, R. F., Light, D. W. (1992). Uncertainty and professional work: Perceptions of physicians in clinical practice.American Journal of Sociology, 97, 1022–1051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Goyert, G. L., Bottoms, S. F., Treadwell, M. C., & Nehra, P. C. (1989). The physician factor in cesarean birth rates.New England Journal of Medicine, 320, 706–709.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1986).LISERAL VI: Analysis of linear structural relationships by maximum likelihood least square methods. Morresville, IN: Scientific Software Inc.Google Scholar
  22. Katz, J. (1984). Why doctors don't disclose uncertainty.The Hastings Center Report, 14, 35–44.Google Scholar
  23. Lazarus, R. S. (1991).Emotion and adaptation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Light, D. W. (1979). Uncertainty and control in professional training.Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 20, 310–322.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Lusted, L. B. (1984). Uncertainty and indecision.Medical Decision Making, 4, 397–399.Google Scholar
  26. Mizrahi, T. (1984). Managing medical mistakes: Ideology, insularity and accountability among internists-in-training.Social Science and Medicine, 19, 135–146.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Roos, N. P., & Roos, L. L. (1981). High and low surgical rates: Risk factors for area residents.American Journal of Public Health, 71, 591.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. SAS Institute Inc. (1989).SAS/STAT user's guide (Version 6, 4th ed.). Cary, NC: SAS Institute.Google Scholar
  29. SAS Institute Inc. (1991).The CALIS procedure: Analysis of covariance structures. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.Google Scholar
  30. Tanaka, J. S. (1987). ‘How big is enough?’ Sample size and goodness of fit in structural equation models with latent variables.Child Development, 58, 134–146.Google Scholar
  31. Wennberg, J. (1986). Which rate is right?New England Journal of Medicine, 314, 310.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Wennberg, J. E., Barnes, B. A., & Zubkoff, M. (1982). Professional uncertainty and the problem of supplier-induced demand.Social Science and Medicine, 16, 811–824.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martha S. Gerrity
    • 1
  • Kinnard P. White
    • 2
  • Robert F. DeVellis
    • 2
  • Robert S. Dittus
    • 3
  1. 1.Oregon Health Sciences UniversityPortland
  2. 2.University of North Carolina at Chapel HillUSA
  3. 3.Indiana UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations