Abstract
Concerns about our current public education systems have given rise to a variety of reform efforts. During the past several years, efforts have begun to emphasize the importance of systems thinking and a “systemic” approach for bringing about fundamental educational reform. In spite of the promise of system design as a model for systemic change, it has been largely ignored by its intended clients, the educational leadership. This paper explores some of the reasons for this and proposes a number of actions that need to be taken if system design is to become a viable approach.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Banathy, B. H. (1991).Systems Design of Education, Educational Technology, NJ.
Sashkin, M., and Ergermeier, J. (1993).School Change Models, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, U.S. Office of Education, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
Warfield, J. (1987). Features relevant to effective system design. Presented at the annual meeting of the International Society of Systems Sciences.
Weick, K. (1987). Loosely couple systems: Relaxed meanings and rich interpretations, Unpublished manuscript, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jenks, C.L. Educational systems design: Making it more user friendly. Systems Practice 8, 307–314 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02250478
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02250478