Journal of Business and Psychology

, Volume 10, Issue 2, pp 141–154 | Cite as

The opportunity for friendship in the workplace: An underexplored construct

  • Christine M. Riordan
  • Rodger W. Griffeth

Abstract

This paper hypothesized and tested a theoretically-based model of the relationship between perceived friendship opportunities in the workplace and work-related outcomes. The empirical findings are based on the survey responses of 174 employees in a small electric utility. Results indicate that employees' perceptions of friendship opportunities in the workplace have direct effects on job involvement and job satisfaction, as well as indirect effects on organizational commitment and intention to turnover. Management implications of friendship opportunities and social features within the workplace are discussed.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aldag, R.J., Barr, S.H., & Brief, A.P. (1981). Measurement of perceived task characteristics.Psychological Bulletin, 90, 415–431.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, J.C., & Gerbing, D.W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach.Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411–423.Google Scholar
  3. Angle, H.L., & Perry, J.L. (1981). An empirical assessment of organizational commitment and organizational effectiveness.Administrative Science Quarterly, 26, 1–14.Google Scholar
  4. Barney, J.B. (1985). Dimensions of informal social network structure: Toward a contingency theory of informal relations in organizations.Social Networks, 7, 1–46.Google Scholar
  5. Bentler, P.M., & Bonett, D.G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures.Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246.Google Scholar
  6. Bollen, K.A. (1989).Structural equations with latent variables. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  7. Burt, R.S. (1982).Toward a structural theory of action: Network models of social structure, perception, and action. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  8. Campion, M.A. (1988). Interdisciplinary approaches to job design: A constructive replication with extensions.Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 467–481.Google Scholar
  9. Crampton, S., & Wagner, J. (1994). Percept-percept inflation in microorganizational research: An investigation of prevalence and effects.Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 67–76.Google Scholar
  10. Festinger, L.S., Schachter, S., & Back, K.W. (1950).Social pressure in informal groups. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  11. Foote, N.N. (1985). Love.Psychiatry, 16, 245–251.Google Scholar
  12. Fried, Y. (1991). Meta-analytic comparison of the job diagnostic survey and job characteristics inventory as correlates of work satisfaction and performance.Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 690–697.Google Scholar
  13. Greeley, A. (1971).The friendship game. New York: Image Books.Google Scholar
  14. Hackman, J.R., & Morris, C.E. (1975). Group tasks, group interaction process, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration. In L. Berkowitz (ed.),Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. IX. New York: Academic Press, 1975.Google Scholar
  15. Hackman, J.R., & Lawler, E.E., III. (1971). Employee reactions to job characteristics.Journal of Applied Psychology, 55, 259–286.Google Scholar
  16. Hackman, J.R., & Oldham, G.R. (1975). Development of the job diagnostic survey.Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 159–170.Google Scholar
  17. Hair, J.R., Jr., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L., & Black, W.C. (1992).Multivariate Data Analysis. New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  18. Hayduk, L.A. (1987).Structural evaluation modeling with LISREL: Essentials and advances. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Hom, P.W., & Griffeth, R.W. (1991). Structural equations modeling test of a turnover theory: Cross sectional and longitudinal analyses.Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 350–366.Google Scholar
  20. James, L.R., Mulaik, S.S., & Brett, J.M. (1982).Causal Analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  21. Jöreskog, K.G., & Sörbom, D. (1989).LISREL VII: User's guide. Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software.Google Scholar
  22. Kanungo, R.N. (1979). The concepts of alienation and involvement revisted.Psychological Bulletin, 86, 119–138.Google Scholar
  23. Krackhardt, D., & Porter, L.W. (1985). When friends leave: A structural analysis of the relationship between turnover and stayers' attitudes.Administrative Science Quarterly, 30, 242–261.Google Scholar
  24. Krackhardt, D., & Stern, R.N. (1988). Informal networks and organizational crises: An experimental simulation.Social Psychology Quarterly, 51, 123–140.Google Scholar
  25. Lawler, E.E., III, & Hall, D.T. (1970). Relationship of job characteristics to job involvement, satisfaction, and intrinsic motivation.Journal of Applied Psychology, 54, 305–312.Google Scholar
  26. Lodahl, T., & Kejner, M. (1965). The definition and measurement of job involvement.Journal of Applied Psychology, 49, 24–33.Google Scholar
  27. Marsh, H.W., Balla, J.R., & McDonald, R.P. (1988). Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size.Psychological Bulletin, 103, 391–410.Google Scholar
  28. Mowday, R.T., Porter, L.W., & Steers, R.M. (1982).Employee-organization linkages. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  29. Mowday, R.T., Steers, R.M., & Porter, L.W. (1979). The measurement of organizational commitment.Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14, 224–247.Google Scholar
  30. Mulaik, S.A., James, L.R., Van Alstine, J., Bennett, N., Lind, S., & Stiwell, C.D. (1989). Evaluation of goodness-of-fit indices for structural equation models.Psychological Bulletin, 105, 430–445.Google Scholar
  31. Nunnally, Jum C. (1978).Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  32. Podsakoff, P.M., Williams, L.J., & Todor, W.D. (1986). Effects of organizational formalization on alienation among professionals and nonprofessionals.Academy of Management Journal, 29, 820–831.Google Scholar
  33. Price, J.L., & Mueller, C.W. (1981). A causal model of turnover for nurses.Academy of Management Journal, 24, 543–565.Google Scholar
  34. Price, J.L., & Mueller, C.W. (1986).Absenteeism and turnover of hospital employees. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  35. Reohr, J.R. (1991).Friendship: An exploration of structure and processes. New York: Garland Publishing, Inc.Google Scholar
  36. Schwab, D.P., & Cummings, L.L. (1976). A theoretical analysis of the impact of task scope on employee performance.Academy of Management Review, 1, 23–35.Google Scholar
  37. Shaw, M.E. (1981).Group dynamics: The psychology of group behavior. 3rd edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  38. Sims, H.P., Szilagyi, A.D., & Keller, R.T. (1976). The measurement of job characteristics.Academy of Management Journal, 19, 195–212.Google Scholar
  39. Steel, R.P., & Griffeth, R.W. (1989). The elusive relationship between estimates of perceived employment opportunity and ensuing turnover. behavior A methodological or conceptual artifact?Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 846–854.Google Scholar
  40. Steel, R.P., & Ovalle, N.K. (1984). A review and meta-analysis of research on the relationship between behavioral intentions and employee turnover.Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 673–686.Google Scholar
  41. Steers, R.M., & Mowday, R.T. (1981). Employee turnover and postdecision accommodation processes. In L.L. Cummings & B.M. Staw (Eds.),Research in organizational behavior, Vol. 3, pp. 235–282. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  42. Stumpf, S.A., & Hartman, K. (1984). Individual exploration to organizational commitment or withdrawal.Academy of Management Journal, 27, 308–329.Google Scholar
  43. Tucker, L.R., & Lewis, C. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis.Psychometrika, 38, 1–10.Google Scholar
  44. Warr, P.B., Cook, J., & Wall, T.D. (1979). Scales for the measurement of some work attitudes and aspects of psychological well-being.Journal of Occupational Psychology, 52, 129–148.Google Scholar
  45. Widamen, K.F. (1985). Hierarchically nested covariance structure models for multitrait-multimethod data.Applied Psychological Measurement, 9, 1–26.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christine M. Riordan
    • 1
  • Rodger W. Griffeth
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Management, Terry College of BusinessThe University of GeorgiaAthens

Personalised recommendations