Skip to main content
Log in

In vivo apparent pA2 analysis in rats treated with either clocinnamox or morphine

  • Original Investigation
  • Published:
Psychopharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Experiments tested the hypothesis that loss of agonist potency or effectiveness following irreversible antagonist or chronic agonist treatment may result from affinity changes at μ opioid receptors. Apparent affinity of naltrexone or nalbuphine for μ opioid receptors was measured in vivo in rats treated with either a single dose of the irreversible antagonist clocinnamox or repeated doses of morphine. Apparent affinity of each antagonist was estimated from its potency as an antagonist of discriminative stimulus or rate-decreasing effects of morphine in rats trained to discriminate 3.2 mg/kg morphine and saline. In control rats, apparent pA2 values for naltrexone and nalbuphine were 7.5–7.6 and 5.3, respectively. In clocinnamox-treated rats, apparent pA2 values for naltrexone were 7.2–7.7, suggesting that clocinnamox treatment did not alter affinity of naltrexone for sites through which morphine exerts behavioral effects. In rats treated repeatedly with morphine, apparent pA2 values for nalbuphine were 5.1–5.3, suggesting that repeated morphine treatment did not alter affinity of nalbuphine for these sites. The observation that neither clocinnamox nor repeated morphine treatment altered in vivo affinity estimates for naltrexone or nalbuphine, respectively, suggests that the reductions in agonist potency produced by these treatments do not result from changes in affinity at μ opioid receptors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams JU, Paronis CA, Holtzman SG (1990) Assessment of relative intrinsic activity of μ-opioid analgesic in vivo by using β-funaltrexamine. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 255: 1027–1032

    Google Scholar 

  • Arunlakshana O, Schild H (1959) Some quantitative uses of drug antagonists. Br J Pharmacol 14: 48–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke TF, Woods JH, Lewis JW, Medzihradsky F (1994) Irreversible opioid antagonist effects of clocinnamox on opioid analgesics andmu receptor binding in mice. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 271: 650–661

    Google Scholar 

  • Comer SD, Burke TF, Lewis JW, Woods JH (1992) Clocinnamox: a novel, systemically-active, irreversible opioid antagonist. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 262[3]: 1051–1056

    Google Scholar 

  • Dum J, Blasig J, Meyer G, Herz A (1979)In vivo opiate binding unchanged in tolerant/dependent mice. Eur J Pharmacol 55: 375–383

    Google Scholar 

  • Dykstra LA (1990) Butorphanol, levallorphan, nalbuphine and nalorphine as antagonists in the squirrel monkey. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 254[1]: 245–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandes M, Kluwe S, Coper H (1977a) The development of tolerance to morphine in the rat. Psychopharmacology 54: 197–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandes M, Kluwe S, Coper H (1977b) Quantitative assessment of tolerance to and dependence on morphine in mice. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol 297: 53–60

    Google Scholar 

  • France CP, Woods JH (1987) β-Funaltrexamine antagonizes the discriminative stimulus effects of morphine but not naltrexone in pigeons. Psychopharmacology 91: 213–216

    Google Scholar 

  • France CP, DeCosta BR, Jacobson AE, Rice KC, Woods JH (1990) Apparent affinity of opioid antagonists in morphine-treated rhesus monkeys discriminating between saline and naltrexone. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 252[2]: 600–604

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerak LR, Butelman ER, Woods JH, France CP (1994) Antinociceptive and respiratory effects of nalbuphine in rhesus monkeys. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 271[2]: 993–999

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris R, Loh HH, Way E (1976) Alterations in the efficacy of naloxone induced by stress, cyclic adenosine monophosphate, and morphine tolerance. Eur J Pharmacol 39: 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollt, V, Dum, J, Blasig, J, Schubert, P, Herz, A (1975) Comparison of in vivo and in vitro parameters of opiate receptor binding in naive and tolerant/dependent rodents. Life Sci 16: 1823–1828

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtzman SG (1983) Discriminative stimulus properties of opioid agonists and antagonists. In: Cooper S (ed) Theory in psychopharmacology. Academic Press, London, pp 1–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe JH, Martin W (1985) Opioid analgesics and antagonists. In: Gilman AG, Goodman LS, Rall TW, Murad F (eds) The pharmacological basis of therapeutics. MacMillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenakin T (1993) Pharmacologic analysis of drug-receptor interaction. Raven Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mucha RF, Kalant H (1980) Log dose/response curve flattening in rats after daily injections of opiates. Psychopharmacology 71: 51–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Paronis CA, Holtzman SG (1992) Development of tolerance to the analgesic activity of μ agonists following continuous infusion of morphine, meperidine, or fentanyl in rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 262: 1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Picker MJ, Yarbrough J, Hughes CE, Smith MA, Morgan D, Dykstra LA (1993) Agonist and antagonist effects of mixed action opioids in the pigeon drug discrimination procedure: influence of training dose, intrinsic efficacy and interanimal differences. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 266[2]: 756–767

    Google Scholar 

  • Takemori A (1974) Determination of pharmacological constants: use of narcotic antagonists to characterize analgesic receptors. In: Braude M, Harris L, May E, Smith J, Villarreal J (eds) Narcotic antagonists. Advances in biochemical psychopharmacology, vol. 8. Raven Press, New York, pp 335–344

    Google Scholar 

  • Takemori A, Portoghese P (1984) Comparative antagonism of mu, kappa, and delta agonists. Eur J Pharmacol 104: 101–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Tallarida, RJ, Murray, RB (1987) Manual of pharmacologic calculations with computer programs, 2nd edn. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Teal JJ, Holtzman SG (1980) Stimulus effects of morphine in the monkey: quantitative analysis of antagonism. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 12: 587–593

    Google Scholar 

  • Tulunay F, Takemori A (1974) Further studies on alteration of analgesic receptor-antagonist interaction induced by morphine. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 190: 401–407

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker EA, Butelman ER, DeCosta BR, Woods JH (1993) Opioid thermal antinociception in rhesus monkeys: receptor mechanisms and temperature dependency. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 267[1]: 280–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker EA, Makhay MM, House JD, Young AM (1994) In vivo apparent pA2 analysis for naltrexone antagonism of discriminative stimulus and analgesic effects of opiate agonists in rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 271[2]: 959–968

    Google Scholar 

  • Young AM, Kapitsopoulos G, Makhay M (1991) Tolerance to morphine-like stimulus effects ofmu opioid agonists. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 257: 795–805

    Google Scholar 

  • Young AM, Masaki MA, Geula C (1992) Discriminative stimulus effects of morphine: effects of training dose on agonist and antagonist effects ofmu opioids. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 261[1]: 246–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Zernig G, Broadbear J, Burke T, Lewis JW, Brine GA, Woods JH (1995) Receptor reserve and affinity of μ opioid agonists in mouse antinociception: correlation with receptor binding. Life Sci 57: 2113–2125

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This work was supported by US Public Health Service Grant DA03796 and NIDA Research Scientist Development Award K02 DA00132 to A.M. Young. A portion of this work is presented in abstract form [Walker EA, Richardson TM, Young AM (1995) Apparent affinity estimates for opioid antagonists in rats treated with clocinnamox or chronic morphine. In: Harris LS (ed) NIDA Res Monogr 153: 450]

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Walker, E.A., Richardson, T.M. & Young, A.M. In vivo apparent pA2 analysis in rats treated with either clocinnamox or morphine. Psychopharmacology 125, 113–119 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02249409

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02249409

Key words

Navigation