Skip to main content
Log in

Stories we tell each other: A comparison of families' and their therapists' explanations of presenting problems

  • Special Issue On The Story And Storytelling
  • Published:
Contemporary Family Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study reports the explanations of presenting problems given by 10 mothers of children referred to a department of child and family psychiatry and their therapists. Video-recordings of therapists' pre-session meetings and the initial therapy sessions were searched for explanatory statements. These statements were then coded. It was found that therapists referred to past events, present circumstances, relationships, and possible future events in their explanations of presenting problems significantly more frequently than mothers. It was rare for mothers to speak in terms of past or future events at all. The mothers explained difficulties in terms of character traits significantly more often than did the therapists. The implications of these findings are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brewin, C., & Antaki, C. (1987). An analysis of ordinary explanations in clinical attribution research.Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 5, 78–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byng-Hall, J. (1973). Family myths used as defence in conjoint family therapy.British Journal of Medical Psychology, 46, 239–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byng-Hall, J. (1979). Re-editing family mythology during family therapy.Journal of Family Therapy 1, 103–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen J. A. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales.Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 36–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Compas, B. E., Adelman, H. S., Freundl, P. C., Nelson P., & Taylor, L. (1982). Parent and child causal attributions during clinical interviews.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 10, 77–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dallos, R. (1991).Family belief systems: Therapy and change. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dallos, R. (1992). Family beliefs and family therapy.Clinical Psychology Forum, 48, 2–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, N., & Schlesinger, S. E. (1991). Marital and family Problems. In W. Dryden & H. Rentoul (Eds.),Adult clinical problems: A cognitive behavioural approach. London: R. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira, A. J. (1963). Family myth and homeostasis.Archives of General Psychiatry, 9, 457–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frosh, S. (1991). The semantics of therapeutic change.Journal of Family Therapy, 13, 171–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furman, B., & Ahola, T. (1989) Adverse effects of psychotherapeutic beliefs: An application of attribution theory to the critical study of psychotherapy.Family Systems Medicine, 72, 163–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, L. (1981).Foundations of family therapy. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, L. (1990). Constructing realities: An art of lenses.Family Process, 29, 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, P. R. (1983). An easy to use BASIC program for agreement amongst many raters.British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 22, 145–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNamee, S., & Gergen, K. (Eds.) (1992).Therapy as social construction. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minuchin, S. (1974).Families and family therapy. London: Tavistock Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munton, A. G., & Stratton, P. (1990). Concept of causality applied in the clinic: Interactional models and attributional style.Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy: An International Quarterly, 4, 197–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palazzoli, M. S., Cecchin, G., Prata, G., & Boscolo, L. (1978).Paradox and counterparadox. New York: Jason Aronson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter, J., & Weatherall, M. (1987).Discourse and social psychology. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stratton, P. (1985).Causal beliefs within the family. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the British Psychological Society.

  • Stratton, P., & Swaffer, R. (1988). Maternal causal beliefs for abused and handicapped children.Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 6, 201–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stratton, P., Munton, A. G., Hanks, H. G. I., Heard, D. H., & Davidson, C. (1988).Leeds Attributional Coding System (LACS) manual. Leeds: Leeds Family Therapy Research Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stratton, P., Preston-Shoot, M., & Hanks, H. (1990).Family therapy: Training and practice. Birmingham: Birmingham Venture Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J. (1986). Parental attributions of emotional disturbance and their relation to the outcome of therapy: Preliminary findings.Australian Psychologist, 21, 271–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watzlawick, P., Weakland, J., & Fisch, R. (1974).Change: Principles of problem formation and problem resolution. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, M. (1988). The externalising of the problem and the re-authoring of lives and relationships.Dulwich Centre Newsletter, Summer 1988/89, 3–21.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Thanks to all of the child and family consultation team at 1 Wolverton Gardens for their participation in this research and particularly to Ruth Kossoff for her great help with organising data collection.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wolpert, M., March, P. Stories we tell each other: A comparison of families' and their therapists' explanations of presenting problems. Contemp Fam Ther 17, 159–173 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02249311

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02249311

Key words

Navigation