Skip to main content
Log in

Self-presentation and consumer interaction styles

  • Full Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Business and Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is hypothesized that self-presentation and consumer interaction styles are interrelated. Specifically those people who adopt an acquisitive self-presentation style are expected to be more assertive than others with respect to requesting information, seeking redress, and resisting sales requests. People adopting a protective self-presentation style are expected to be less assertive with respect to these same consumer interactions. The results of the study support the expectations and imply the importance of considering self-presentation styles in understanding interpersonal influence and interpersonal communications in the marketplace.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arkin, R. M. (1981). Self-presentation styles. In J. T. Levi (Ed.),Impression Management Theory and Social Psychology Research. New York: Academic Press, 311–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bearden, W. O. and Crockett, M. (1981). Self-monitoring, norms, and attitudes as influences on consumer complaining.Journal of Business Research, 9, 225–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——, Shruptine, F., and Teel, J. (1989). Self-monitoring and reactions to image appeals and claims about product quality. In T. Srull (Ed.),Advances in consumer research (16, pp. 703–710). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becherer, R., Morgan, F., and Richard, L. (1982). Informal group influence among situationally/dispositionally oriented consumers.Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 10, 269–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——, and Richard, L. (1978). Self-monitoring as a moderating variable in consumer behavior.Journal of Consumer Research, 5, 159–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellenger, D. and Krogaonker, P. (1978). Profiling the recreational shopper.Journal of Retailing, 56(Fall), 77–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, S. and Cheek, J. (1988). On the nature of self-monitoring: Problems with assessment, problems with validity.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 663–678.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——, Cheek, J., and Buss, A. (1980). An analysis of the self-monitoring scale.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 679–686.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinberg, D. and Plimpton, L. (1986). Self-monitoring and product conspicuousness on reference group influence. In R. Lutz (Ed.),Advances in consumer research (13, pp. 297–300). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheek, J. and Briggs, S. (1981). Self-consciousness, self-monitoring, and aspects of identity. Paper presented at the Meeting of the American Psychological Association, Los Angeles.

  • Cutler, B. and Wolfe, R. (1985). Construct validity of the concern for appropriateness scale.Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(3), 319–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeBono, K. G. and Packer, M. (1991). “The effects of advertising appeal on perceptions of product quality.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17(2), 194–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, R. (1988). Self-monitoring and leadership emergence in groups.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 14(4), 681–693.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, R. Adamson, R., Deszca, G., and Cawsey, T. (1988). Self-monitoring and leadership emergence.Small Group Behavior, 19(3), 312–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feick, L. and Price, L. (1987). The market maven: A diffuser of marketplace information.Journal of Marketing, 51(January), 83–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C. and Westbrook, R. (1979). An exploratory study of assertiveness, aggressiveness, and complaining behavior. In W. Wilkie (Ed.),Advances in consumer research (6, pp. 105–110). Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabrenya, W. and Arkin, R. (1980). Self-monitoring scale: Factor structure and correlates.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 6, 13–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J., Anderson, R., and Tatham, R. (1987).Multivariate data analysis (2nd ed.). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. (1989). Concern for appropriateness scale and behavioral conformity.Journal of Personality Assessment, 53(3), 567–574.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. (1984).Self-monitoring: Reliability of the concern for appropriateness scale. Unpublished manuscript, Missouri Western State College, Saint Joseph, MO.

  • Lennox, R. (1988). The problem with self-monitoring: A two-sided scale with a one-sided theory.Journal of Personality Assessment, 52, 58–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——, and Wolfe, R. (1984). A revision of the self-monitoring scale.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 1348–1364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, M. and Thayer, J. (1989). On the existence of discrete classes in personality: Is self-monitoring the correct joint to carve?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 143–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nantel, J. and Strahle, W. (1986). The self-monitoring concept: A consumer behavior perspective. In R. Lutz (Ed.),Advances in consumer research (13, pp. 83–87). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richins, M. (1983). An analysis of consumer interaction styles in the marketplace.Journal of Consumer Research, 10, 73–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shruptine, F., Bearden, W., and Teel, J. (1990). An analysis of the dimensionality and reliability of the Lennox and Wolfe Revised Self-Monitoring Scale.Journal of Personality Assessment, 54, 515–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slama, M. and Tashchian, A. (1985). Selected socioeconomic and demographic characteristics associated with purchasing involvement.Journal of Marketing, 49 (Winter), 72–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, M. (1974). Self-monitoring of expressive behavior.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 526–537.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——, and DeBono, K. (1985). Appeals to image and claims about quality: Understanding the psychology of advertising.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 586–597.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——, and Gangestad, S. (1986). On the nature of self-monitoring: Matters of assessment, matters of validity.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 125–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorelli, H. and Engledow, J. (1980). Information seekers and information systems: A policy perspective.Journal of Marketing, 44 (Spring), 9–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, R., Lennox, R., and Cutler, B. (1986). “Getting along” and “getting ahead”: Empirical support for a theory of protective and acquisitive self-presentation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 356–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, R., Welch, L., Lennox, R., and Cutler, B. (1985). Concern for appropriateness as a moderator variable in the statistical explanation of self-reported use of alcohol and marijuana.Journal of Personality, 53(1), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, M., Gioioso, C., and Tellini, S. (1988). Control orientation, self-monitoring, and preference for image versus quality approach to advertising.Journal of Research in Personality, 22, 89–100.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The authors thank three anonymous reviewers for their particularly helpful comments.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Slama, M., Celuch, K. Self-presentation and consumer interaction styles. J Bus Psychol 10, 19–30 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02249267

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02249267

Keywords

Navigation