Low doses of atropine sulfate impair retention of a well-learned spatial task

  • T. M. Rauch
  • D. I. Welch
  • L. Gallego
Article

Summary

Retention of a well-learned spatial task was assessed in rats 10 minutes prior to, and 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 minutes after treatment with 3, 10 or 30 mg/kg, iv, atropine sulfate or the equivalent volume of saline, iv. There was a variable dose effect for escape latency and choice accuracy measures of spatial retention. A relatively large dose of atropine sulfate (30 mg/kg, iv) significantly impaired choice accuracy and escape latency compared with the control group. Moreover, impairment in choice accuracy was observed with smaller doses of atropine sulfate (3, 10mg/kg, iv) than have previously been shown to disrupt spatial retention.

Keywords

Atropine spatial retention dose-response 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Albanus L, Hammarstrom L, Sundwall A, Ulberg S, Vango B (1968) Distribution and metabolism of3H-atropine in mice. Acta Physiol Scand 73: 447–456Google Scholar
  2. Buresova O, Bolhuis J, Bures J (1986) Differential effects of cholinergic blockade on performance of rats in the water tank navigation task and in a radial water maze. Behav Neurosci 100: 476–482Google Scholar
  3. Chippendale TJ, Cotman CW, Kozar MD, Lynch GS (1974) Analysis of acetylcholinesterase synthesis and transport in the rat hippocampus: Recovery of acetylcholinesterase activity in the septum and hippocampus after administration of diisopropylfluorophosphate. Brain Res 81: 485–496Google Scholar
  4. Dudar JD, Whishaw IQ, Szerb JC (1979) Release of acetylcholine for the hippocampus of freely moving rats during sensory stimulation and running. Neuropharmacology 18: 673–678Google Scholar
  5. Ellen P, Weston SL (1983) Problem solving in the rat: septal lesion effects of habituation and perserverative tendencies. Physiol Psychol 11: 112–118Google Scholar
  6. Ellen P, Wages C (1984) The use of intramaze stimuli in the attenuation of the problemsolving deficit of septal animals. Physiol Psychol 12: 133–140Google Scholar
  7. Ellen P, Taylor HS, Wages C (1986) Cholinergic blockade effects on spatial integration versus cue discrimination performance. Behav Neurosci 100: 720–728Google Scholar
  8. Fibiger HC (1982) The organization and some projections of cholinergic neurons of the mammalian forebrain. Brain Rev 4: 327–388Google Scholar
  9. Hagan JJ, Tweedie F, Morris RGM (1986) Lack of task specificity and absence of posttraining effects of atropine on learning. Behav Neurosci 100: 483–493Google Scholar
  10. Herink J, Bajgar J, Patocka J (1975) Changes of acetylcholinesterase activity is some parts of the limbic system following septal lesions in rats. J Neurochem 24: 187–188Google Scholar
  11. Johnson M, McKinney M, Coyle J (1979) Evidence for a cholinergic projection to neocortex from neurons in basal forebrain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 76: 5392–5396Google Scholar
  12. Lehman J, Nagy JI, Atmadja S, Fibiger HC (1980) The nucleus basalis magnocellularis: the origin of a cholinergic projection to the neocortex of the rat. Neuroscience 5: 1161–1174Google Scholar
  13. Lewis PR, Shute CCD (1967) The cholinergic limbic system. Projections to hippocampal formation, medial cortex, nuclei of the ascending cholinergic reticular system and the subfornical organ and supra-optic crest. Brain 90: 521–540Google Scholar
  14. Meaney MJ, Aitken DH, van Berkel C, Bhatnagar S, Sapolsky RM (1988) Effect of neonatal handling on age-related impairments associated with the hippocampus. Science 239: 766–768Google Scholar
  15. Morris RGM (1981) Spatial localization does not require the presence of local cues. Learning Motivation 12: 239–261Google Scholar
  16. O'Keefe J, Nadel L (1978) The hippocampus as a cognitive map. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  17. Olton DS (1978) The function of septo-hippocampal connections in spatially-organized behaviour. In: Functions of the septo-hippocampal system. CIBA Foundation Symposium 58. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 327–342Google Scholar
  18. Olton DS, Becker JT, Handelmann GE (1979) Hippocampus, space and memory. Behav Brain Sci 2: 313–365 (includes commentary)Google Scholar
  19. Rauch TM, Welch DI, Gallego L (1988) Retention of a spatial task after intraperitoneal, subcutaneous or intravenous injections of equal doses of atropine. Life Sci 43: 1913–1920Google Scholar
  20. Schallert T, DeRyck M, Teitelbaum P (1980) Atropine sterotypy as a behavioural trap: a movement subsystem and electroencephalographic analysis. J Comp Physiol Psychol 94: 1–24Google Scholar
  21. Sutherland RJ, Whishaw IQ, Kolb B (1982 a) A behavioural analysis of spatial localization following electrolytic, kainate- or colchicine-induced damage to the hippocampal formation in the rat. Behav Brain Res 7: 133–153Google Scholar
  22. Sutherland RJ, Whishaw IQ, Regehr JC (1982 b) Cholinergic receptor blockade impairs spatial localization of use of distal cues in the rat. J Comp Physiol Psychol 96: 563–573Google Scholar
  23. Vanderwolf CH (1975) Neocortical and hippocampal activation in relation to behaviour: effects of atropine eserine, phenothiazines, and amphetamine. J Comp Physiol Psychol 88: 300–323Google Scholar
  24. Wenk H, Bigl V, Meyer U (1980) Cholinergic projections from magnocellular nuclei of the basal forebrain to cortical areas in rats. Brain Res Rev 2: 295–316Google Scholar
  25. Whishaw IQ (1985) Cholinergic receptor blockade in the rat impairs locale but not taxon strategies for place navigation in a swimming pool. Behav Neurosci 99: 979–1005Google Scholar
  26. Whishaw IQ, Tomie JA (1987) Cholinergic receptor blockade produces impairments in a sensorimotor subsystem for place navigation in the rat: evidence from sensory, motor, and acquisition test in a swimming pool. Behav Neurosci 101: 603–616Google Scholar
  27. Yamamura HI, Kuhar MJ, Snyder SJ (1974) In vivo identification of muscarinic cholinergic receptor binding in rat brain. Brain Res 80: 170–176Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. M. Rauch
    • 1
  • D. I. Welch
    • 1
  • L. Gallego
    • 1
  1. 1.U.S. Army Research Institute of EnvironmentalNatickU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations