Advertisement

Aerobiologia

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 97–106 | Cite as

Predicting the intensity of the birch pollen season

  • åslög Dahl
  • Sven-Olov Strandhede
Article

Abstract

We present a model for the prediction of the magnitude ofBetula flowering and pollen dispersal which may be used in the management of birch pollinosis and in the planning of clinical trials. The pollen sum during the flowering season is regressed on the temperature sum from May 1st to July 20th during the initiation year, the pollen sum of the initiation year, and the temperature sum during the main pollen season in the flowering year. We suggest that the fluctuating flowering pattern inBetula alba-species is primarily determined by the availability of assimilation products during inflorescence initiation and development during the spring one year before anthesis. When inflorescences, which are initiated during the previous year, elongate in the beginning of anthesis, they act as strong sinks to stored carbohydrates, and thus compete with developing leaves and shoots. The result is an initially reduced photosynthetic capacity in years with intense flowering, and a limited potential for the initiation of new inflorescences for the following year. The ambient temperature during catkin initiation affects assimilation efficiency and is a determinant of about equal importance to flowering intensity as is the magnitude of the flowering in the initiation year. The amount of pollen dispersed is also dependent on the weather during anthesis, which is not possible to predict until about one month in advance. The two other independent variables are available during the previous summer, making it possible to give a sufficiently valid prediction to allergologists about the magnitude of the next birch pollen season, according to its botanical determinants. We suggest that the varying reproductive output inBetula alba should not be described as true masting. A more parsimonious explanation to the flowering pattern is that an individual continually maximizes reproductive effort, according to what is possible, but that reproduction is often constrained by the environment.

Keywords

Betula L. Mast flowering Prediction model Pollen season Pollinosis Aerobiology 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andersen, T.B. (1991) A model to predict the beginning of the pollen season. Grana 30, 269–275.Google Scholar
  2. Baker, F.S. (1950) Principles of Silviculture. McGraw-Hill, New York, p. 1.Google Scholar
  3. Baldwin, H.I. (1942) Forest Tree Seed of the North Temperate Region. Chronica Botanica, Waltham, MA.Google Scholar
  4. Binnie, R.C. and Clifford, P.E. (1981) Flower and pod production inPhaseolus vulgaris. J. Agric. Sci. Cambridge 97, 397–402.Google Scholar
  5. Caesar, J.C. and Macdonald, A.D. (1983a) Shoot development inBetula papyrifera. II. Comparison of vegetative and reproductive short-shoot growth. Can. J. Bot. 61, 3066–3071.Google Scholar
  6. Caesar, J.C. and Macdonald, A.D. (1983b) Shoot development inBetula papyrifera. IV. Comparisons between growth characteristics and expression of vegetative long and short shoots. Can. J. Bot. 62, 446–453.Google Scholar
  7. Caesar, J.C. and Macdonald, A.D. (1984) Shoot development inBetula papyrifera. V. Effect of male inflorescence formation and flowering on long shoot development. Can. J. Bot. 62, 1708–1713.Google Scholar
  8. Chapman, G.P. and Sajadi, A.S. (1981) Exogenous growth substances and internal competition inVicia faba L. Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 104, 265–273.Google Scholar
  9. Dahl, å.E. and Fredrikson, M. (in press) The timetable for development of maternal tissues sets the stage for male genomic selection inBetula pendula. Am. J. Bot., in press.Google Scholar
  10. Davis, L.D. (1957) Flowering and alternate bearing. Proc. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 70, 545–556.Google Scholar
  11. Dunbar, A. and Rowley, J.R. (1984)Betula pollen development before and after dormancy: exine and intine. Pollen Spores 17, 429–486.Google Scholar
  12. Furlow, J.J. (1990) The genera of Betulaceae in the southeastern United States. J. Arnold. Arboretum 71, 1–67.Google Scholar
  13. Gross, H.L. (1972) Crown deterioration and reduced growth associated with excessive seed production by birch. Can. J. Bot. 50, 2431–2437.Google Scholar
  14. Hjelmroos, M. (1991) Evidence of long-distance transport ofBetula pollen. Grana 30, 215–228.Google Scholar
  15. Ims, R.A. (1990) On the adaptive value of reproductive synchrony as a predator-swamping strategy. Am. Nat. 136, 485–498.Google Scholar
  16. Kelly, D. (1994) The evolutionary ecology of mast seeding. Trends Ecol. Evol. 8, 122–123.Google Scholar
  17. Koenig, W.D., Mumme, R.L., Carmen, W.J. and Stanback, M.T. (1994) Acorn production by oaks in central coastal California: variation within and among years. Ecology 73, 99–109.Google Scholar
  18. Kozlowski, T.T. (1963) Growth characteristics of forest trees. J. For. 61, 655–662.Google Scholar
  19. Lavee, S. (1989) Involvement of plant growth regulators and endogenous growth substances in the control of alternate bearing. Acta Hortic. 239, 311–323.Google Scholar
  20. Lee, T.D. (1988) Patterns of fruit and seed production. In: J. Lovett Doust and L. Lovett Doust (Eds.), Plant Reproductive Ecology. Patterns and Strategies. Oxford University Press, London, pp. 179–202.Google Scholar
  21. Linvill, D.E. (1990) Calculating chilling hours and chill units from daily maximum and minimum temperature observations. Hortic. Sci. 25(1), 14–16.Google Scholar
  22. Macdonald, A.D. and Mothersill, D.H. (1983) Shoot development inBetula papyrifera. I. Short-shoot organogenesis. Can. J. Bot. 61, 3049–3065.Google Scholar
  23. Macdonald, A.D., Mothersill, D.H. and Caesar, J.C. (1984) Shoot development inBetula papyrifera. III. Long shoot organogenesis. Can. J. Bot. 62, 437–445.Google Scholar
  24. Nilsson, S.G. and Wästljung, U. (1987) Seed predation and cross-pollination in mast-seeding beech (Fagus sylvatica) patches. Ecology 68, 260–265.Google Scholar
  25. Norton, D.A. and Kelly, D. (1988) Mast seeding over 33 years byDacrydium cupressinum Lamb, (rimu) (Podocarpaceae) in New Zealand: the importance of economics of scale. Funct. Ecol. 2, 399–408.Google Scholar
  26. Richardson, E.A. and Anderson, J.L. (1986) The omnidata biophenometer (TA45-P): A chill unit and growing degree hour accumulator. Acta Hortic. 184, 95–99.Google Scholar
  27. Sage, T. (1986) Relationship of carbon availability to abscission in reproductive tissues ofPhaseolus vulgaris. In: A.R. Cooke (Ed.), Proceedings of the 13th Annual Meeting of the Plant Growth Regulator Society.Google Scholar
  28. Sarvas, R. (1952) On the flowering of birch and the quality of seed crop. Commun. Inst. For. Fenn. 40, 1–35.Google Scholar
  29. Sharp, W.M. and Sprague, V.G. (1967) Flowering and fruiting in the white oaks: pistillate flowering, acorn development, weather, and yields. Ecology 48, 243–251.Google Scholar
  30. Silvertown, J.W. (1980) The evolutionary ecology of mast seeding in trees. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 14, 235–250.Google Scholar
  31. Smith, C.C., Hamrick, J.L. and Kramer, C.L. (1990) The advantage of mast years for wind pollination. Am. Nat. 136, 154–166.Google Scholar
  32. Sork, V.L., Bramble, J. and Sexton, O. (1993) Ecology of mast-fruiting in three species of Missouri oaks,Quercus alba, Quercus rubra, andQuercus velutina (Fagaceae). Ecology 74, 528–541.Google Scholar
  33. Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute (1978–1994) Väder och vatten, Norrköping.Google Scholar
  34. Toumey, J.W. and Korstian, C.F. (1937) Foundations of Silviculture upon an Ecological Basis. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  35. Tyldesley, J.B. (1973a) Long-range transmission of tree pollen to Shetland. I. Sampling and trajectory. New Phytol. 72, 175–181.Google Scholar
  36. Tyldesley, J.B. (1973b) Long-range transmission of tree pollen to Shetland. II. Calculation of pollen deposition New Phytol. 72, 183–190.Google Scholar
  37. Waller, D.M. (1979) Models of mast fruiting in trees. J. Theor. Biol. 80, 223–232.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Systematic BotanyGothenburgSweden

Personalised recommendations