Abstract
This research investigated the role of injection procedures as a potential confound in the study of associative and nonassociative morphine tolerance development. Rats administered a series of morphine injections paired with a distinctive context environment can develop tolerance controlled associatively by the context. However, rats given morphine unpaired with the context may also develop some degree of tolerance. This study examined whether this tolerance represents an associative effect with animals using the injection ritual as a cue predictive of morphine delivery. Following 14 days of habituation to handling and injection stimuli, rats were given eight morphine injections (20 mg/kg, IP) explicitly paired or unpaired with a distinctive context. Animals were then tested for morphine analgesia in the context after either a 30-day rest condition or a 30-day period of daily saline injections. Analgesia was assessed by the tail-flick method, and tolerance was defined as the shift to the right of the dose-response curve of morphine-experienced relative to saline control animals. Paired animals across both retention conditions displayed tolerance, whereas tolerance retention in unpaired animals was observed only in those animals not given saline injections over the 30-day interval. Results support an associative interpretation of tolerance observed in unpaired conditions and suggest that the injection ritual may provide highly salient cues for the support of associative tolerance effects.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baker TB, Tiffany ST (1985) Morphine tolerance as habituation. Psychol Rev 92:78–108
Cepeda-Benito A, Tiffany ST (1992) Effect of number of conditioning sessions on the development of associative tolerance to morphine. Psychopharmacology 109:172–176
Cohen J, Cohen P (1975) Applied multiple regression/correlational analysis for the behavioral sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillside, New Jersey
Dafters RI, Bach L (1985) Absence of environment-specificity in morphine tolerance acquired in nondistinctive environments: habituation or stimulus overshadowing? Psychopharmacology 87:101–106
Kesner RP, Cook DG (1983) Role of habituation and classical conditioning in the development of morphine tolerance. Behav Neurosci 97:4–12
Poulos CX, Cappell H (1991) Homeostatic theory of drug tolerance: a general model of general adaptation. Psychol Rev 98:390–408
Schnur P, Martinez RA (1989) Environmental control of morphine tolerance in the hamster. Anim Learn Behav 17:322–327
Siegel S (1975) Evidence from rats that morphine tolerance is a learned response. J Comp Physiol Psychol 89:498–506
Tiffany ST, Cepeda-Benito A (1993) An examination of tolerance and potential compensatory responses on four assays of morphine analgesia. College of Problems of Drug Dependence Annual Scientific Meeting
Tiffany ST, Maude-Griffin PM (1988) Tolerance to morphine in the rat: associative and nonassociative effects. Behav Neurosci 102:534–543
Tiffany ST, Maude-Griffin PM, Drobes D (1991) The effect of dose interval on the development of associative tolerance to morphine in the rat: a dose-response analysis. Behav Neurosci 105:49–61
Tiffany ST, Droves DJ, Cepeda-Benito A (1992) Contribution of associative and nonassociative processes to the development of morphine tolerance Psychopharmacology 109:185–190
Trujillo KA, Akil H (1994) Inhibition of opiate tolerance by non-competitiveN-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist. Brain Res 633:178–88
Westbrook RF, Greeley JD (1992) Conditioned tolerance to morphine hypoalgesia: compensatory hyperalgesia in the experimental group or conditioned hypoalgesia in the control group? Q J Exp Psychol 45B:161–187
Wolgin DL, Benson HD (1991) Role of associative mechanisms in tolerance to morphine „anorexia“. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 39:279–286
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cepeda-Benito, A., Tiffany, S.T. Role of drug-administration cues in the associative control of morphine tolerance in the rat. Psychopharmacology 122, 312–316 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02246554
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02246554