, Volume 122, Issue 4, pp 346–350 | Cite as

Haloperidol differentially affects reinforcement and motivational processes in rats running an alley for intravenous heroin

  • K. McFarland
  • A. Ettenberg
Original Investigation


The role of drug-paired environmental stimuli in opiate self-administration was investigated by exposing animals to discrete cues that were predictive of the availability or unavailability of heroin reinforcement. Rats were trained to traverse a straight arm runway for a reinforcement consisting of a single 0.1 mg/kg intravenous infusion of heroin delivered upon entrance to the goal box. On each trial, one of two discriminative olfactory stimuli (orange and almond) was used: one which signaled the availability of heroin in the goal box (S+), and one which signaled its absence (S−). The effect of dopamine (DA) receptor antagonism on reinforcement and motivational processes was investigated by pretreating subjects with 0.0, 0.15 or 0.30 mg/kg of the DA receptor antagonist drug, haloperidol. Haloperidol had no effect on operant runway performance (i.e. goal time) in any condition. However, 24 h later, on the first post-treatment trial, those haloperidol animals that received heroin in the goal box on the previous trial (i.e. the S+ condition) ran reliably more slowly than subjects that received vehicle on the previous S+ trial. These results suggest that haloperidol does not affect the motivational properties of stimuli which predict the availability of heroin, while it does diminish the reinforcing effects of actually receiving heroin.

Key words

Heroin self-administration Reinforcement Motivation Discriminative stimulus Haloperidol Dopamine 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Beninger RJ, Hahn BL (1983) Pimozide blocks establishment but not expression of amphetamine-produced environment-specific conditioning. Science 220: 1304–1306PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Beninger RJ, Herz RS (1986) Pimozide blocks establishment but not expression of cocaine- produced environment specific conditioning. Life Sci 38: 1425–1431CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Braun GA, Poos GI, Soudijn W (1967) Distribution, excretion and metabolism of neuroleptics of the butyrophenone type. II. Distribution, excretion and metabolism of haloperidol in Sprague-Dawley rats. Eur J Pharmacol 1: 58–62CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Cunningham ST, Kelley AE (1992) Opiate infusion into nucleus accumbens: contrasting effects on motor activity and responding for conditioned reward. Brain Res 588: 104–114CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Davis WM, Smith SG (1976) Role of conditioned reinforcers in the initiation, maintenance and extinction of drug taking behavior. Pavlov J Biol Sci 11: 222–238PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Ettenberg A, Camp CH (1986a) Haloperidol induces a partial reinforcement extinction effect in rats: implications for a dopamine involvement in food reward. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 25: 813–821CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Ettenberg A, Camp CH (1986b) A partial reinforcement extinction effect in water-reinforced rats intermittently treated with haloperidol. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 25: 1231–1235CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Ettenberg A, Horvitz JC (1990) Pimozide prevents the response-reinstating effects of water reinforcement in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 31: 861–865Google Scholar
  9. Ettenberg A, Petit HO, Bloom FE, Koob GF (1982) Heroin and cocaine intravenous self-administration in rats: mediation by separate neural systems. Psychopharmacologia 78: 204–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ettenberg A, MacConell LA, Geist TD (1995) Effects of haloperidol in a response- reinstatement model of heroin relapse. Psychopharmacology (in press)Google Scholar
  11. Fontana DJ, Post RM, Pert A (1993) Conditioned increases in mesolimbic dopamine overflow by stimuli associated with cocaine. Brain Res 629: 31–39CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Franklin KBJ (1978) Catecholamines and self-stimulation: reward and performance deficits dissociated. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 9: 813–820Google Scholar
  13. Franklin KBJ, McCoy SN (1979) Pimozide-induced extinction in rats: stimulus control of responding rules out motor deficit. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 11: 71–76CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Gallistel CR, Boytim M, Gomita Y, Kebanoff L (1982) Does pimozide block the reinforcing effect of brain stimulation? Pharmacol Biochem Behav 17: 769–781Google Scholar
  15. Geist TD, Ettenberg A (1990) A simple method for studying intravenous drug reinforcement in a runway. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 36: 703–706CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Gerber GJ, Sing J, Wise RA (1981) Pimozide attenuates lever pressing for water in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 14: 201–205Google Scholar
  17. Goldberg SR, Schuster CR (1970) Conditioned nalorphine-induced abstinence changes: persistence in post morphine dependent monkeys. J Exp Anal Behav 14: 33–46PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Hinson RE, Poulos CX, Thomas W, Cappell H (1986) Pavlovian conditioning and addictive behavior: relapse to oral self-administration of morphine. Behav Neurosci 100: 386–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Horvitz JC, Ettenberg A (1991) Conditioned incentive properties of a food-paired conditioned stimulus remain intact during dopamine receptor blockade. Behav Neurosci 105: 536–541CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Lewi PJ, Heykants JJ, Allewijn FT, Dony JG, Janssen, PA (1970) Distribution and metabolism of neuroleptic drugs. I. Pharmacokinetics of haloperidol. Arzneimittelforschung 20: 943–948PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Liao RM, Fowler SC (1990) Haloperidol produces within session increments in operant response duration in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 36: 191–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. O'Brien CP (1976) Experimental analysis of conditioning factors in human narcotic addiction. Pharmacol Rev 27: 533–543Google Scholar
  23. O'Brien CP, Testa T, O'Brien TJ, Brady JP, Wells B (1977) Conditioned narcotic withdrawal in humans. Science 195: 1000–1002PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Ohman R, Larsson M, Nilsson IM, Engel J, Carlsson A (1977) Neurometabolic and behavioral effects of haloperidol in relation to drug in serum and brain. Naunyn-Schmiedberg's Arch Pharmacol 299: 105–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pavlov IP (1927) Conditioned reflexes; an investigation of the physiological activity of the cerebral cortex. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  26. Robins LN, Helzer JE, Davis DH (1975) Narcotic use in Southeast Asia and afterwards. Arch Gen Psychiatry 32: 955–961PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Robinson TE, Berridge KC (1993) The neural basis of drug craving: an incentive- sensitization theory of addiction. Brain Res Rev 18: 244–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Schuster CR, Woods JH (1968) The conditioned reinforcing effects of stimuli associated with morphine reinforcement. Int J Addict 3: 223–230Google Scholar
  29. Thompson T, Ostlund W (1965) Susceptibility to readdiction as a function of the addiction and withdrawal environment. J Comp Physiol Psychol 60: 388–392PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Vaillant GE (1969) The natural history of urban narcotic drug addiction — some determinants. In: Steinberg H (ed) Scientific basis of drug dependence. Churchill, LondonGoogle Scholar
  31. Vezina P, Stewart J (1987) Conditioned locomotion and place preference elicited by tactile cues paired exclusively with morphine in an open field. Psychopharmacology 91: 375–380CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Wikler A (1948) Recent progress in research on the neurophysiological basis of morphine addiction. Psychosom Med 36: 189–298Google Scholar
  33. Wikler A (1965) Conditioning factors in opiate addiction and relapse. In: Wilner DM, Kassebaum GG (eds) Narcotics. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 85–100Google Scholar
  34. Wise RA (1982) Neuroleptics and operant behavior: the anhedonia hypothesis. Behav Brain Sci 5: 39–88Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. McFarland
    • 1
  • A. Ettenberg
    • 1
  1. 1.Behavioral Pharmacology Laboratory, Department of PsychologyUniversity of CaliforniaSanta BarbaraUSA

Personalised recommendations