Advertisement

Psychopharmacology

, Volume 123, Issue 2, pp 164–171 | Cite as

The relative salience of morphine and contextual cues as conditioned stimuli

  • N. M. Bormann
  • D. A. Overton
Original Investigation

Abstract

Two experiments were conducted to delineate further the properties of conditioning when morphine is used as a conditioned stimulus (CS) in the conditioned suppression of drinking paradigm. Experiment 1 used a test for overshadowing designed to compare the relative salience of contextual cues (metal box) and morphine induced cues (6 mg/kg, IP) as CSs when each was paired with a foot shock unconditioned stimulus (US) in water deprived rats. Six groups (six rats each) were exposed to conditioning procedures during which the conditioning context was present 19 h (groups 1 and 2), 90 min (groups 3 and 4), or 5 min (groups 5 and 6) before shock onset, and morphine (in groups 1, 3, and 5) or saline (in groups 2, 4, and 6) was injected 10 min before shock. Subsequently, the magnitude of suppression of drinking in response to morphine, to the metal box, and to morphine plus the metal box was measured. Only group 1 (19 h group) suppressed drinking in response to morphine, while groups 3–6 suppressed drinking whenever tested in the metal box. The results indicate that morphine cues acted as a CS that elicited suppression of drinking in group 1, and that contextual cues present up to 90 min before morphine cues overshadowed morphine. Experiment 2 showed that expression of the conditioned response to morphine was blocked by naloxone.

Key words

Drug stimulus effects Drug conditioned stimulus Pavlovian conditioning Stimulus context State dependent learning Morphine 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ayres JB, Albert M, Bombace JC (1987) Extending conditioned stimuli before versus after unconditioned stimuli: implications for real-time models of conditioning. J Exp Psychol [Anim Behav] 13: 168–181Google Scholar
  2. Bormann NM, Overton DA (1993) Morphine as a conditioned stimulus in a conditioned emotional response paradigm. Psychopharmacology 112: 277–284Google Scholar
  3. Carey RJ (1991) Pavlovian conditioning between co-administered drugs: elicitation of an apomorphine-induced antiparkinsonian response by scopolamine. Psychopharmacology 104: 463–469Google Scholar
  4. Davey VA, Biederman GB (1991) Methodological issues in drug-drug conditioning in rats: nonassociative factors in heart rate and avfail. Behav Neurosci 105: 850–859Google Scholar
  5. Gibbon J, Balsam PD (1981) The spread of association in time. In: Locurto CM, Terrace HS, Gibbon JG (eds) Autoshaping and conditioning theory. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Greeley J, Le DA, Poulos CX, Cappell H (1984) Alcohol is an effective cue in the conditional control of tolerance to alcohol. Psychopharmacology 83: 159–162Google Scholar
  7. Lett BT (1992) Pairings of a drug or place conditioned stimulus with lithium chloride produce conditioned sickness, not antisickness. Behav Neurosci 106: 106–111Google Scholar
  8. Overton DA (1982) Comparison of the degree of discriminability of various drugs using the T-maze drug discrimination paradigm. Psychopharmacology 76: 385–395Google Scholar
  9. Overton DA, Shen CF, Tatham TA (1993) Centrally acting drugs act as conditioned stimuli in a conditioned suppression of drinking task. Psychopharmacology 112: 270–276Google Scholar
  10. Rescorla RA, Wagner AR (1972) A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonre-inforcement. In: Black AH, Prokasy WF (eds) Classical conditioning II: current research and theory. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Rescorla RA, Durlach PJ, Grau JW (1985) Contextual learning in Pavlovian conditioning. In: Balsam PD, Tomie A (eds) Context and learning. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, HillsdaleGoogle Scholar
  12. Revusky S (1985) Drug interactions measured through taste aversion procedures with an emphasis on medical implications. Ann NY Acad Sci 443: 250–271Google Scholar
  13. Revusky S, Reilly S (1990) Dose effects of heart rate conditioning when pentobarbital is the CS and amphetamine is the US. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 36: 933–936Google Scholar
  14. Revusky S, Davey V, Zagorski M (1989) Heart rate conditioning with pentobarbital as a conditioned stimulus and amphetamine as an unconditioned stimulus. Behav Neurosci 103: 296–307Google Scholar
  15. Shannon H, Holtzman SG (1976) Evaluation of the discriminative effects of morphine in the rat. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 198: 54–65Google Scholar
  16. Silverman PB, Grabowski J, Lane KE (1992) Rotational behavior as a classically conditioned response to pentobarbital administration. Eur J Pharmacol 212: 165–169Google Scholar
  17. Turner EG, Altshuler HL (1976) Conditioned suppression of an operant response usingd-amphetamine as the conditioned stimulus. Psychopharmacology 50: 139–143Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. M. Bormann
    • 1
  • D. A. Overton
    • 1
  1. 1.Departments of Psychology and PsychiatryTemple UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations