Psychopharmacology

, Volume 102, Issue 1, pp 28–36 | Cite as

Amnesic trace locked into the benzodiazepine state of memory

  • Francis C. Colpaert
Original Investigations

Abstract

Rats were trained in a food-rewarded lever-pressing task until they could complete an FR10 requirement within the first 120 s of the session, and were tested for the retention of this response requirement after having reached this criterion. The pharmacological treatment instituted at the time of tests was either the same as or different from that used during acquisition. In this state-dependency (StD) procedure, saline-to-drug as well as drug-to-saline state changes produced robust failures to transfer with chlordiazepoxide (CDP) and also with yohimbine. Diazepam substituted for, while Ro 15-1788 antagonised, CDP; none of several non-benzodiazepine compounds substituted for CDP. Neither food deprivation nor extensive overtraining after CDP prevented the failure of transfer when animals were tested for drug-to-saline transfer. Another series of experiments evaluated the effects of CDP and diazepam in a rat conflict procedure. The doses at which CDP and diazepam produced anti-conflict effects were similar to those at which failure to transfer occurred in saline-to-drug state changes, and higher than those at which such failure occurred in drug-to-saline state changes. With benzodiazepines, StD of memory retrieval conceivably constitutes a parsimonious explanation of the anxiolytic and untoward (amnesic, drug dependence) actions of these drugs.

Key words

State-dependence Benzodiazepines Memory Drug dependence Drug tolerance Rat 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Balster RL (1985) Behavioral studies of tolerance and dependence. In: Seiden LS, Balster RL (eds) Behavioral pharmacology: the current status. Liss, New York, pp 403–418Google Scholar
  2. Carlton PL (1983) A primer of behavioral pharmacology. Freeman, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Colpaert FC (1986) A method for quantifying state-dependency with chlordiazepoxide in rats. Pyschopharmacology 90:144–146Google Scholar
  4. Colpaert FC, Janssen PAJ (1982) Factors regulating drug cue sensitivity: limits of discriminability and the role of a progressively decreasing training dose in cocaine-saline discrimination. Neuropharmacology 21:1187–1194CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Colpaert FC, Shearman GT (1988) Tolerance, endorphins and other aspects of opiate drug discrimination. In: Rodgers RJ, Cooper SJ (eds) Endorphins, opiates and behavioural processes. Wiley, London, pp 77–105Google Scholar
  6. Colpaert FC, Niemegeers CJE, Janssen PAJ (1976) Theoretical and methodological considerations on drug discrimination learning. Psychopharmacologia 46:169–177CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Cook L, Davidson AB (1973) Effects of behaviorally active drugs in a conflict-punishment procedure in rats. In: Garattini S, Mussini E, Randall O (eds) The benzodiazepines. Raven Press, New York, pp 327–345Google Scholar
  8. Cook L, Sepinwall J (1975) Psychopharmacological parameters of emotion. In: Levi L (ed) Emotions-their parameters and measurement. Raven Press, New York, pp 327–345Google Scholar
  9. Geller I, Seifter J (1960) The effects of meprobamate, barbiturates,d-amphetamine and promazine on experimentally induced conflict in the rat. Psychopharmacologia 1:482–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hart M (1980) Ratten. Amsterdam Wetenschappelijke Uitgeverij, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  11. Hunheler W, Mohler H, Pieri L, Polc P, Bonetti EP, Cumin R, Schaffner R, Haefely W (1981) Selective antagonists of benzodiazepines. Nature 290:514–516CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Lister RG (1985) The amnesic action of benzodiazepines in man. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 9:87–94CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Martin WR, Wikler A, Eades CG, Pexcor FR (1963) Tolerance to and physical dependence on morphine in rats. Psychopharmacologia 4:247–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Meert TF, Colpaert FC (1986) The shock probe conflict procedure. A new assay responsive to benzodiazepines, barbiturates and related compounds. Psychopharmacology 88:445–450CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Miller NE (1955) Learnable drives and rewards. In: Stevenson SS (ed) Handbook of experimental psychology. Wiley, New York, pp 435–472Google Scholar
  16. Mowrer OH (1939) A stimulus-response analysis of anxiety and its role as a reinforcing agent. Psychol Rev 46:553–566Google Scholar
  17. Overton D (1966) State-dependent learning produced by depressant and atropine-like drugs. Psychopharmacologia 10:6–31CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Overton D (1982a) Memory retrieval failures produced by changes in drug state. In: Isaacson RL, Spear NE (eds) The expression of knowledge; neurobehavioral transformation of information into action. Plenum Press, New York, pp 113–139Google Scholar
  19. Overton D (1982b) Comparison of the degree of discriminability of various drugs using the T-maze drug discrimination paradigm. Psychopharmacology 76:385–395CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Overton D (1983) State-dependent learning and drug discrimination. In: Iversen LL, Iversen SD, Snyder SH (eds) Handbook of psychopharmacology, vol 18. Plenum Press, New York, pp 59–127Google Scholar
  21. Sepinwall J, Cook L (1978) Behavioral pharmacology of anti-anxiety drugs. In: Iversen LL, Iversen SD, Snyder SH (eds) Handbook of psychopharmacology, vol 13. Biology of mood and anti-anxiety drugs. Plenum Press, New York, pp 345–393Google Scholar
  22. Siegel S (1956) Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Stolerman IP, Shine PJ (1985) Trends in drug discrimination research analysed with a cross-indexed bibliography, 1982–1983. Psychopharmacology 85:1–11CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Tallarida RJ, Murray RB (1987) Manual of pharmacologic calculations with computer programs, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Tatum AL, Seevers MH, Collins KH (1929) Morphine addiction and its physiological interpretation based on experimental evidence. J Pharmacol, 36:447–475Google Scholar
  26. Weingartner H (1978) Human state-dependent learning. In: Ho BT, Richards DW III, Chute DL (eds) Drug discrimination and state dependent learning. Academic Press, New York, pp 363–383Google Scholar
  27. Weingartner H (1985) Models of memory dysfunction. Ann NY Acad Sci 444:359–369PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Francis C. Colpaert
    • 1
  1. 1.Neurobiology DivisionFONDAX-Groupe de Recherche SERVIERPuteauxFrance

Personalised recommendations