Skip to main content
Log in

Reply to comments by Overton, Emmett-Oglesby and Gauvin and Holloway

  • Rebuttal
  • Published:
Psychopharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Colpaert FC (1987) Drug discrimination: methods of manipulation, measurement, and analysis. In: Bozarth MA (ed) Methods of assessing the reinforcing properties of abused drugs. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 341–372

    Google Scholar 

  • Colpaert FC, Niemegeers CJE, Janssen PAJ (1976) Theoretical and methodological considerations on drug discrimination learning. Psychopharmacology 46:169–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolerman IP (1989) Discriminative stimulus effects of nicotine in rats trained under different schedules of reinforcement. Psychopharmacology 97:131–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stolerman IP, Garcha HS, Rasul F (1990) Quantal and quantiative drug discrimination. Psychopharmacology 101:S75

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barrett, R.J., Caul, W.F., Huffman, E.M. et al. Reply to comments by Overton, Emmett-Oglesby and Gauvin and Holloway. Psychopharmacology 113, 302–303 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02245200

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02245200

Navigation