Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Commentary on “Drug discrimination is a continuous rather than a quantal process following training on a VI-TO schedule of reinforcement” by Barrett et al.

  • Commentary
  • Published:
Psychopharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Moerschbaecher JP, Thompson DM, Thomas JR (1979) Effects of methamphetamine and scopolamine on variability of response location. J Exp Anal Behav 32:255–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolerman IP (1989) Measures of stimulus generalization in drug discrimination experiments. Behav Pharmacol 2:265–282

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pharmacology, Texas College of Osteopathic Medicine, 3500 Camp Bowie Blvd, 76107-2699, Fort Worth, TX, USA

    M. W. Emmett-Oglesby

Authors
  1. M. W. Emmett-Oglesby
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Emmett-Oglesby, M.W. Commentary on “Drug discrimination is a continuous rather than a quantal process following training on a VI-TO schedule of reinforcement” by Barrett et al.. Psychopharmacology 113, 300–301 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02245199

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02245199

Keywords

Search

Navigation