Skip to main content
Log in

Disadvantages of quantal drug discrimination procedures

  • Commentary
  • Published:
Psychopharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Bickel WK, Etzel BC (1985) The quantal nature of controlling stimulus-response relations as measured in tests of stimulus generalization. J Exp Anal Behav 44:245–270

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Colpaert FC, Niemegeers CJE, Janssen PAJ (1976) Theoretical and methodological considerations on drug discrimination learning. Psychopharmacologia 46:169–177

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fantino E (1977) Conditioned reinforcement: choice and information. In: Honig WK, Staddon JER (eds). Handbook of operant behavior. Englewood Cliffs, Prentice Hall, pp 313–339

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrnstein RJ, Loveland DH (1975) Maximizing and matching on concurrent ratio schedules. J Exp Anal Behav 24:107–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Overton DA (1966) State-dependent learning produced by depressant and atropine-like drugs. Psychopharmacologia 10:6–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Overton DA, Leonard WR, Merkle DA (1986) Methods for measuring the strength of discriminable drug effects. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 10:251–263

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Overton, D.A. Disadvantages of quantal drug discrimination procedures. Psychopharmacology 113, 298–299 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02245198

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02245198

Keywords

Navigation