Skip to main content
Log in

Locomotor-activating effects of the D2 agonist bromocriptine show environment-specific sensitization following repeated injections

  • Original Investigations
  • Published:
Psychopharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Biphasic effects of bromocriptine (2.0, 5.0, 10.0, and 20.0 mg/kg IP) on locomotion were quantified in photocell activity boxes in rats. Following early suppression of activity, bromocriptine produced a clear, dose-dependent increase in locomotion that lasted several hours. When a low dose of bromocriptine (5.0 mg/kg) was administered daily over a 3-week period, the locomotor-activating effects of the drug showed progressive enhancement over days. The sensitization was environment specific; rats administered bromocriptine six times in the home cage showed no sign of a sensitized response to bromocriptine when subsequently tested in the activity box. Thus, selective stimulation of D2 receptors stimulates locomotion and sensitizes animals to subsequent injections, just as do the indirect-acting dopamine agonists cocaine and amphetamine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barone P, Davis TA, Braun AR, Chase TN (1986) Dopaminergic mechanisms and motor function: characterization of D-1 and D-2 dopamine receptor interaction. Eur J Pharmacol 123:109–114

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bartoletti M, Gaiardi M, Gubellini G, Bacchi A, Babbini M (1983) Long-term sensitization to the excitatory effects of morphine. Neuropharmacology 22:1193–1196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beninger RJ, Hahn BL (1983) Pimozide blocks the establishment but not expression of amphetamine-produced environment-specific conditioning. Science 220:1304–1306

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beninger RJ, Herz RS (1986) Pimozide blocks establishment but not expression of cocaine-produced environment-specific conditioning. Life Sci 38:1425–1431

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Browne RG, Segal DS (1977) Metabolic and experiential factors in the behavioral response to repeated amphetamine. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 6:545–552

    Google Scholar 

  • DiChiara G, Imperato A (1988) Drugs abused by humans preferentially increase synaptic dopamine concentrations in the mesolimbic system of freely moving rats. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85:5274–5278

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Drew KL, Glick SD (1989) Environment-dependent sensitization to amphetamine-induced circling behavior. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 31:705–708

    Google Scholar 

  • Drew KL, Glick SD (1990) Role of D-1 and D-2 receptor stimulation in sensitization to amphetamine-induced circling behavior and in expression and extinction of the Pavlovian conditioned response. Psychopharmacology 101:465–471

    Google Scholar 

  • Eikelboom R, Stewart J (1982) The conditioning of drug-induced physiological responses. Psychol Rev 89:507–528

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hassan MN, Higgins D, Traub M, Fahn S (1986) Chronic treatment with bromocriptine induces behavioral supersensitivity in rats. Life Sci 39:513–518

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heikkila RE, Orlansky H, Cohen G (1975) Studies on the distinction between uptake inhibition and release of (3-H)dopamine in rat brain tissue slices. Biochem Pharmacol 24:847–852

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson DM, Hashizume M (1986) Bromocriptine induces marked locomotor stimulation in dopamine-depleted mice when D-1 dopamine receptors are stimulated with SKF 38393. Psychopharmacology 90:147–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson DM, Hashizume M (1987) Bromocriptine-induced locomotor stimulation in mice is modulated by dopamine D-1 receptors. J Neural Transm 69:131–145

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson DM, Ross SB, Hashizume M (1988) Further studies on the interaction between bromocriptine and SKF 38393 in reserpine and alpha methyl-para-tyrosine-treated mice. Psychopharmacology 94:321–327

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson DM, Ross SB, Edwards SR (1989a) Dopamine D2 agonist-induced behavioural depression is reversed by dopamine D1 agonists. J Neural Transm 75:213–220

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson DM, Ross SB, Larsson L (1989b) Dopamine D-2 receptor agonist-induced behavioral depression: critical dependence upon postsynaptic dopamine D-1 function. Arch Pharmacol 340:355–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joyce EM, Iversen SD (1979) The effect of morphine applied locally to mesencepahlic dopamine cell bodies on spontaneous motor activity in the rat. Neurosci Lett 14:207–212

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kalivas PW (1985) Sensitization to repeated enkephalin administration into the ventral tegmental area of the rat. II. Involvement of mesolimbic dopamine system. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 235:544–550

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kalivas PW, Duffy P (1987) Sensitization to repeated morphine injection in the rat: possible involvement of A10 dopamine neurons. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 241:204–212

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kalivas PW, Taylor S, Miller JS (1985) Sensitization to repeated enkephalin administration into the ventral tegmental area of the rat. I. Behavioral characterization. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 235:537–543

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kuczenski R, Leith NJ (1981) Chronic amphetamine: is dopamine a link in or a mediator of the development of tolerance and reverse tolerance? Pharmacol Biochem Behav 15:405–413

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Markstein R (1981) Neurochemical effects of some ergot derivatives: a basis for their antiparkinson actions. J Neural Transm 51:39–59

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews RT, German DC (1984) Electrophysiological evidence for excitation of rat ventral tegmental area dopaminergic neurons by morphine. Neuroscience 11:617–626

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mattlingly BA, Gotsick JE (1989) Conditioning and experimential factors affecting the development of sensitization to apomorphine. Behav Neurosci 103:1311–1317

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mattingly BA, Gotsick JE, Salamanca K (1988) Latent sensitization to apomorphine following repeated low doses. Behav Neurosci 102:553–558

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrowski NL, Hatfield CB, Caggiula AR (1982) The effects of low doses of morphine on the activity of dopamine containing cells and on behavior. Life Sci 31:2347–2350

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Post RM, Contel NR (1983) Human and animal studies of cocaine: implications for development of behavioral pathology. In: Creese I (ed) Stimulants: neurochemical, behavioral and clinical perspectives. Raven Press, New York, pp 169–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Post RM, Lockfeld A, Squillace KM, Contel NR (1981) Drug-environment interaction: context dependency of cocaine-induced behavioral sensitization. Life Sci 28:755–760

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Post RM, Weiss SRB, Pert A (1987) The role of context and conditioning in behavioral sensitization to cocaine. Psychopharmacol Bull 23:425–429

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson TE (1984) Behavioral sensitization: characterization of enduring changes in rotational behavior produced by intermittent injections of amphetamine in male and female rats. Psychopharmacology 84:466–475

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson TE, Becker JB (1982) Behavioral sensitization is accompanied by an enhancement in amphetamine-stimulated dopamine release from striatal tissue in vitro. Eur J Pharmacol 85:253–254

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson TE, Becker JB (1986) Enduring changes in brain and behavior produced by chronic amphetamine administration: a review and evaluation of animal models of amphetamine psychosis. Brain Res Rev 11:157–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson TE, Becker JB, Presty SK (1982) Long-term facilitation of amphetamine-induced rotational behavior and striatal dopamine release produced by a single exposure to amphetamine: sex differences. Brain Res 253:231–241

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson TE, Jurson PA, Bennett JA, Bentgen KM (1988) Persistent sensitization of dopamine neurotransmission in ventral striatum (nucleus accumbens) produced by prior experience with (+)-amphetamine: a microdialysis study in freely moving rats. Brain Res 462:211–222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel S (1977) Morphine tolerance as an associative process. J Exp Psychol [Anim Behav Proc] 3:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith RC, Strong JR, Hicks PB, Samorajski T (1979) Behavioral evidence for supersensitivity after chronic bromocriptine administration. Psychopharmacology 60:241–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart J, Vezina P (1988) Conditioning and behavioral sensitization. In: Kalivas PW, Barnes CD (eds) Sensitization in the nervous system. Telford Press, New Jersey, pp 207–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart J, Vezina P (1989) Microinjections of SCH-23390 into the ventral tegmental area and substantia nigra pars reticulata attenuate the development of sensitization to the locomotor activating effects of systemic amphetamine. Brain Res 495:401–406

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Szechtman H, Canaran G, Ibrahim F, Eilam D (1989) Nonlinear sensitization of activity produced by chronic treatment with the D2 agonist quinpirole. Soc Neurosci Abstr 15:1157

    Google Scholar 

  • Tadokoro S, Kuribara H (1986) Reverse tolerance to the ambulation-increasing effect of methamphetamine in mice as an animal model of amphetamine psychosis. Psychopharmacol Bull 22:757–762

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilson HA, Rech RH (1973) Conditioned drug effects and absence of tolerance tod-amphetamine induced motor activity. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 1:149–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Traub M, Wagner HR, Hassan M, Jackson-Lewis V, Fahn S (1985) The effects of chronic bromocriptine treatment on behavior and dopamine receptor binding in the rat striatum. Eur J Pharmacol 118:147–154

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ujike H, Onoue T, Akiyama K, Hamamura T, Otsuki S (1989) Effects of selective D-1 and D-2 dopamine antagonists on development of methamphetamine-induced behavioral sensitization. Psychopharmacology 98:89–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Vezina P, Stewart J (1984) Conditioning and place-specific sensitization of increases in activity induced by morphine in the VTA. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 20:925–934

    Google Scholar 

  • Vezina P, Stewart J (1989) The effect of dopamine receptor blockade on the development of sensitization to the locomotor activating effects of amphetamine and morphine. Brain Res 499:108–120

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vezina P, Kalivas PW, Stewart J (1987) Sensitization occurs to the locomotor effects of morphine and the specific μ opioid receptor agonist, DAGO, administered repeatedly to the ventral tegmental area but not to the nucleus accumbens. Brain Res 417:51–58

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss SRB, Post RM, Pert A, Woodward R, Murman D (1989) Context-dependent cocaine sensitization: differential effect of haloperidol on development versus expression. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 34:655–661

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hoffman, D.C., Wise, R.A. Locomotor-activating effects of the D2 agonist bromocriptine show environment-specific sensitization following repeated injections. Psychopharmacology 107, 277–284 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02245148

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02245148

Key words

Navigation