Skip to main content
Log in

Species differences in the mechanism through which the serotonergic agonists indorenate and ipsapirone produce their anxiolytic action

  • Original Investigations
  • Published:
Psychopharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effect of three anxiolytic drugs, indorenate, ipsapirone and diazepam, on the burying behaviour of rats and mice was studied. All three drugs induced a reduction in burying behaviour interpreted as a reduction in anxiety. However, a species difference in the diazepam sensitivity was found: rats showed a clear effect after 1.0 mg/kg while already at 0.25 mg/kg an action was observed in mice. The serotonergic anxiolytics produced similar responses at similar doses (2.5–5.0 mg/kg) in both species. The serotonergic antagonists, pindolol (3.1 mg/kg), alprenolol (5.0 mg/kg) and methiotepin (0.31 mg/kg), induced a slight reduction in the time spent burying but effectively counteracted the anxiolytic action of the serotonergic agonists in mice but not in rats. By contrast, in rats, the beta blocker, practolol (0.5 mg/kg), was the only drug effective in preventing the anxiolytic actions of ipsapirone. The combined treatment of indorenate and methiotepin resulted in an impairment of motor coordination and ambulatory behaviour in both species studied, thereby suggesting that the lack of effect of such combination was mediated by altering the motor behaviour. Finally, the reduction in ambulatory behaviour in mice produced by ipsapirone was effectively prevented by the antagonists methiotepin, pindolol and alprenolol indicating the involvement of a serotonergic receptor in this effect. From these results it is concluded that a different mechanism underlies the anxiolytic actions of indorenate and ipsapirone in mice and rats.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahlenius S, Larsson K (1987) Evidence for a unique pharmacological profile of 8-OH-DPAT by evaluation of its effects on male rat sexual behaviour. In: Dourish CT, Ahlenius S, Hutson PH (eds) Brain 5-HT1A receptors: behavioural and neurochemical pharmacology. Ellis Horwood, Chichester, pp 185–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Amrick CL, Bennett DA (1986) A comparison of the anticonflict activity of serotonin agonists and antagonists in rats. Soc Neurosci Abstr 12:907

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett JE, Witkin JM, Mansbach RS, Skolnick P, Weissman BA (1986) Behavioural studies with anxiolytic drugs. III. Antipunishment actions of buspirone in the pigeon do not involve benzodiazepine receptor mechanism. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 238:1009–1013

    Google Scholar 

  • Benitez-King G, Antón-Tay F, Hong E (1991) Characterization of indorenate effects on brain monoamine metabolism. Drug Dev Res 34:433–437

    Google Scholar 

  • Broekkamp CLE, Berendsen HHG, Jenk F, Van Delft AML (1989) Animal models for anxiety and response to serotonergic drugs. Psychopathology 22 [suppl 1]:2–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Craft RM, Howard JL, Pollard GT (1988) Conditioned defensive burying as a model for identifying anxiolytics. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 30:775–780

    Google Scholar 

  • Critchley MAE, Handley SL (1987) Effects in the X maze anxiety model of agents acting at the 5-HT1 and 5-HT2 receptors. Psychopharmacology 93:502–506

    Google Scholar 

  • Dompert WV, Glaser T, Traber J (1985) 3H-TVX Q 7821: identification of 5-HT1 binding sites as a target for a novel putative anxiolytic. Naunyn Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol 328:467–470

    Google Scholar 

  • Dourish CT (1987) Brain 5-HT receptors and anxiety. In: Dourish CT, Ahlenius S, Hutson PH (eds) Brain 5-HT1A receptors: behavioural and neurochemical pharmacology. Ellis Horwood, Chichester, pp 261–277

    Google Scholar 

  • Eison AS, Eison MS, Stanley M, Riblet LA (1986) Serotonergic mechanisms in the behavioural effects of buspirone and gepirone. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 24:701–707

    Google Scholar 

  • Engel JA, Hjorth S, Svensson K, Carlsson A, Lilieqvist S (1984) Anticonflict effect of the putative serotonin receptor agonist 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino) tetralin (8-OH-DPAT). Eur J Pharmacol 105:365–368

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Guasti A, Hong E (1989) Antianxiety effect of various putative S1 receptor agonists on the conditioned defensive burying paradigm. In: Bevan P, Cools AR, Archer T (eds) The behavioural pharmacology of 5-HT. Lawrence Earlbaum, New York, pp 377–382

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Guasti A, López-Rubalcava C (1990) Evidence for the involvement of the 5-HT1A receptor in the anxiolytic action of indorenate and ipsapirone. Psychopharmacology 101:354–358

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Guasti A, Picazo O (1990) The actions of diazepam and serotonergic anxiolytics vary according to the gender and the estrous cycle phase. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 37:77–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Guasti A, Escalante A, Hong E, Agmo A (1990) Behavioural actions of indorenate, a new putative 5-HT1A agonist. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 37:83–88

    Google Scholar 

  • File S (1985) Animal models for predicting clinical efficacy of anxiolytic drugs: social behaviour. Neuropsychobiology 13:55–62

    Google Scholar 

  • File S, Johnston AL, Pellow S (1987) Effects of compounds acting at CNS 5-hydroxytryptamine systems on anxiety in the rat. Br J Pharmacol 90:265P

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner CR (1985) Pharmacological studies of the role of serotonin in animal models of anxiety. In: Green AR (ed) Neuropharmacology of serotonin. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 281–325

    Google Scholar 

  • Geller I, Hartmann RJ (1982) Effects of buspirone on operant behaviour of laboratory rats and cynomologous monkeys. J Clin Psychiatry 43:25–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin GM, Green AR (1985) A behavioural and biochemical study in mice and rats of putative selective agonists and antagonists for 5-HT1 and 5-HT2 receptors. Br J Pharmacol 84:743–753

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin GM, De Souza RJ, Green AR (1986) The effects of a 5-HT1 receptor ligand ipsapirone (TVX Q 7821) on 5-HT synthesis and the behavioural effects of 5-HT agonists in mice and rats. Psychopharmacology 89:382–387

    Google Scholar 

  • Green AR, Goodwin GM (1987) The pharmacology of the hypothermic response of rodents to 8-OH-DPAT administration and the effects of psychotropic drug administration on this response. In: Dourish CT, Ahlenius S, Hutson PH (eds) Brain 5-HT1A receptors: behavioural and neurochemical pharmacology. Ellis Horwood, Chichester, pp 161–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Hjorth S (1985) Hypothermia in the rat induced by the potent serotonergic agent 8-OH-DPAT. J Neural Transm 61:131–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong E, Villalón C (1988) External carotid vasodilation induced by serotonin and indorenate. Proc West Pharmacol Soc 31:99

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyer D, Engel G, Kalman HO (1985) Molecular pharmacology of 5-HT1 and 5-HT2 recognition sites in rat and pig brain membranes: radioligand binding studies with (3H) 5-HT, (3H) 8-OH-DPAT, (-) (125I) Iodocyanopindolol, (3H) mesulergine and (3H) ketanserin. Eur J Pharmacol 118:13–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutson PH, Dourish CT, Curzon G (1987) 8-Hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino) tetralin (8-OH-DPAT)-induced hyperphagia: neurochemical and pharmacological evidence for an involvement of 5-hydroxytryptamine somatodendritic receptors. In: Dourish CT, Ahlenius S, Hutson PH (eds) Brain 5-HT1A receptors: behavioural and neurochemical pharmacology. Ellis Horwood, Chichester, pp 209–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutson PH, Dourish CT, Curzon G (1988) Evidence that the hyperphagic response to 8-OH-DPAT is mediated by 5-HT1A receptors. Eur J Pharmacol 150:361–366

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly D (1980) Clinical review of beta-blockers in anxiety. Pharmacopsychiatry 13:259–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Korte SM, Bohus B (1990) The effect of ipsapirone on behavioural and cardiac responses in the shock-probe/defensive burying test in male rats. Eur J Pharmacol 181:307–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd KD, Bartholini G (1974) The effect of methiotepin on cerebral monoamine neurons. In: Costa E, Gessa GL, Sandler M (eds) Advances in biochemical psychopharmacology, vol 10. Serotonin: new vistas. Raven Press, New York, pp 305–309

    Google Scholar 

  • Maggio JC, Harder DB (1983) Genotype and environment interactively determine the magnitude, directionality, and abolition of defensive burying in mice. Anim Learn Behav 11:162–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Morselli PL, Kilborn JR, Cavero I, Harrison DC, Langer SZ (1983) Betaxolol and other β1-adrenoceptor antagonists. Raven Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Njung'e K, Handley SL (1991) Evaluation of marble-burying behaviour as a model of anxiety. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 38:63–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellow S, Johnston AL, File SE (1987) Selective agonists and antagonists for 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor subtypes, and interactions with yohimbine and FG 7142 using the elevated plus-maze test in the rat. J Pharm Pharmacol 39:917–928

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinel JPJ, Treit D (1978) Burying as a defensive response in rats. J Comp Physiol Psychol 92:708–712

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohmer JG, Di Scala G, Sandner G (1990) Behavioural analysis of the effects of benzodiazepine receptor ligands in the conditioned burying paradigm. Behav Brain Res 38:45–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanger DJ, Joly D, Zivkovik B (1985) Behavioural effects of non-benzodiazepine anxiolytic drugs: a comparison of CGS 9896 and zopiclone with chlordiazepoxide. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 232:831–837

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd JK, Rodgers RJ (1990) 8-OH-DPAT specifically enhances feeding behaviour in mice: evidence from behavioural competition. Psychopharmacology 101:408–413

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel S (1956) Non parametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Svensson K, Larsson K, Ahlenius S, Arvidsson L-E, Carlsson A (1987) Evidence for a facilitatory role of central 5-HT in male mouse sexual behaviour. In: Dourish CT, Ahlenius S, Hutson PH (eds) Brain 5-HT1A receptors: behavioural and neurochemical pharmacology. Ellis Horwood, Chichester, pp 199–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Traber J, Davies MA, Dompert WU, Glaser T, Schuurman T, Seidel PR (1984) Brain serotonin receptors as a target for the putative anxiolytic TVX Q 7821. Brain Res Bull 12:741–744

    Google Scholar 

  • Treit D (1985) Animal models for the study of antianxiety agents: a review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 9:203–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Treit D, Fundytus M (1988) A comparison of buspirone and chlordiazepoxide in the shock-probe/burying test for anxiolytics. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 30:1071–1075

    Google Scholar 

  • Treit D, Pinel JPJ, Fibiger HC (1981) Conditioned defensive burying: a new paradigm for the study of anxiolytic agents. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 15:619–626

    Google Scholar 

  • Witkin JM, Barrett JE (1986) Interaction of buspirone and dopaminergic agents on punished behaviour in pigeons. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 24:751–756

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fernández-Guasti, A., Hong, E. & López-Rubalcava, C. Species differences in the mechanism through which the serotonergic agonists indorenate and ipsapirone produce their anxiolytic action. Psychopharmacology 107, 61–68 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02244966

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02244966

Key words

Navigation