, Volume 116, Issue 1, pp 9–18 | Cite as

Observational studies of dopamine D1 and D2 agonists in squirrel monkeys

  • Sharon Rosenzweig-Lipson
  • Paul Hesterberg
  • Jack Bergman
Original Investigations


The behavioral effects of selective D1 and D2, nonselective, and indirectly acting dopamine agonists were compared in squirrel monkeys using continuous observation procedures. D1 agonists including SKF 81297, SKF 82958, andR(+)-6-Br-APB produced dose-dependent increases in the frequencies of stationary postures and head movements and had little or no effect on either huddling or scratching. In contrast, SKF 75670 andR-SKF 38393, which are considered to be D1 partial agonists, had effects comparable to those of the D1 antagonist SCH 39166. That is, the D1 partial agonists increased the duration of huddling without greatly altering the frequencies of stationary postures, head movements, or scratching. Unlike the D1 agonists, the D2 agonists (+)-PHNO, quinpirole, and bromocriptine increased the frequency of scratching, but did not consistently alter other observable behaviors. The indirect dopamine agonists cocaine, GBR 12909, andd-amphetamine and the nonselective D1/D2 agonist CY 208–243, but not (−)apomorphine, had effects comparable to those of D1 agonists such as SKF 81297. That is, each of these drugs increased the frequencies of stationary postures and head movements with little or no effect on scratching or huddling. Additionally, effects of the D1 agonist SKF 82958 and the indirect dopamine agonist cocaine were surmountably antagonized by the D1 antagonist SCH 39166. The present results show that: 1) behavioral effects of D1 and D2 agonists in monkeys are qualitatively different; 2) D1 agonists presumed to differ in intrinsic activity have dissimilar effects; and 3) effects of indirect dopamine agonists are comparable to those of D1 agonists with presumably high intrinsic activity.

Key words

SKF 81297 SKF 82958 R(+)-6-Br-APB R-SKF 38393 SKF 75670 SCH 39166 (+)-PHNO Quinpirole Bromocriptine Cocaine d-Amphetamine GBR 12909 Observable behavior Partial agonist Efficacy Squirrel monkeys 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Andersen PH, Jansen JA (1990) Dopamine receptor agonists: selectivity and dopamine D1 receptor efficacy. Eur J Pharmacol 188:335–347Google Scholar
  2. Appel JB, Weathersby RT, Cunningham KA, Callahan PM, Barrett RL (1988) Stimulus properties of dopaminergic drugs: comparisons involving selective agonists and antagonists. In: Transduction mechanisms of drug stimuli. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  3. Arnt J (1988) The discriminative stimulus properties of the D-1 agonist SKandF 38393 and the D-2 agonist (−)-NPA are mediated by separate mechanisms. Life Sci 42: 565–574Google Scholar
  4. Arnt J, Hyttel J (1986) Behavioral differentiation between effects elicited at dopamine D-1 and D-2 receptors in rats. Clin Neuropharmacol 9: 17–19Google Scholar
  5. Arnt J, Bogeso KP, Hyttel J, Meier E (1988) Relative dopamine D1 and D2 receptor affinity and efficacy determine whether dopamine agonists induce hyperactivity or oral stereotypy in rats. Pharmacol Toxicol 62: 121–130Google Scholar
  6. Arnt J, Hyttel J, Sanchez C (1992) Partial and full dopamine D1 receptor agonists in mice and rats: relation between behavioral effects and stimulation of adenylate cyclase activity in vitro. Eur J Pharmacol 213: 259–267Google Scholar
  7. Bergman J, Rosenzweig-Lipson S (1992) Cocaine-antagonist effects of limited efficacy D1 agonists. NIDA Res Monogr 119: 185–189Google Scholar
  8. Bergman J, Rosenzweig-Lipson S (1993) Antagonist effects of dopamine D1 partial agonists in primates. Soc Neurosci. Abstr 19: 760Google Scholar
  9. Bergman J, Melia KF, Johnson SE, Hesterberg P, Spealman RD (1990) Behavioral effects of dopamine D1 agonists in squirrel monkeys. FASEB J 4: A675Google Scholar
  10. Bergman J, Madras BK, Spealman RD (1991) Behavioral effects of D1 and D2 receptor antagonists in squirrel monkeys. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 258: 910–917Google Scholar
  11. Bergman J, Rosenzweig-Lipson S, Madras BK (1993) Modification of the behavioral effects of dopamine D1 and D2 agonists by dopamine receptor blockade. Pharmacologist 35: 128Google Scholar
  12. Boyce S, Rupniak NMJ, Steventon MJ, Iversen SD (1990) Differential effects of D1 and D2 agonists in MPTP-treated primates: functional implications for Parkinson's disease. Neurology 40: 927–933Google Scholar
  13. Britton DR, Asin K, Yahiro L, Curzon L, Williams J (1991) D1 dopamine receptor agonists induce forelimb clonus. Soc Neurosci Abstr 17: A638.2Google Scholar
  14. Conover WJ, Iman RL (1981) Rank transformations as a bridge between parametric and nonparametric statistics. Am Statist 35: 124–129Google Scholar
  15. Domino EF, Sheng J (1993)N-Methyl-d-aspartate receptor antagonist and dopamine D1 and D2 agonist interactions in 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,5,6-tetrahydropyridine-induced hemiparkinsonian monkeys. J Pharmacol Exp Ther (264): 221–225Google Scholar
  16. Eilam D, Szechtman H (1989) Biphasic effects of the D-2 agonist quinpirole on locomotion and movements. Eur J Pharmacol 161: 151–157Google Scholar
  17. Izenwasser S, Katz JL (1993) Differential efficacies of dopamine D1 receptor agonists for stimulating adenylyl cyclase in squirrel monkey and rat. Eur J Pharmacol 246: 39–44Google Scholar
  18. Jackson DM, Jenkins OF, Ross SB (1988) The motor effects of bromocriptine — a review. Psychopharmacology 95: 433–446Google Scholar
  19. Kamien JB, Goldberg LI, Woolverton WL (1987) Discriminative stimulus effects of D1 and D2 dopamine agonists in rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 242: 804–811Google Scholar
  20. Katz JL, Witkin JM (1992) Selective effects of the D1 dopamine receptor agonist, SKF 38393, on behavior maintained by cocaine injection in squirrel monkeys. Psychopharmacology 109: 241–244Google Scholar
  21. Kleven MS, Anthony EW, Woolverton WL (1990) Pharmacological characterization of the discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine in rhesus monkeys. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 254: 312–317Google Scholar
  22. Longoni R, Spina L, Di Chiara G (1987) Permissive role of D-1 receptor stimulation by endogenous dopamine for the expression of postsynaptic D-2 mediated behavioral responses. Yawning in rats. Eur J Pharmacol 134: 163–173Google Scholar
  23. Loschmann PA, Smith LA, Lange KW, Jaehnig P, Jenner P, Marsden CD (1991) Motor activity following the administration of selective D-1 and D-2 dopaminergic drugs to normal common marmosets. Psychopharmacology 105: 303–309Google Scholar
  24. Loschmann PA, Smith LA, Lange KW, Jaehnig P, Jenner P, Marsden CD (1992) Motor activity following the administration of selective D-1 and D-2 dopaminergic drugs to MPTP-treated common marmosets. Psychopharmacology 109: 49–56Google Scholar
  25. Madras BK, Fahey MA, Canfield DR, Spealman RD (1988) D1 and D2 dopamine receptors in caudate-putamen of nonhuman primates (Macaca fascicularis). J Neurochem 51: 934–943Google Scholar
  26. Madras BK, Elmaleh D, Meltzer P, Lee-Parritz DE, Hantraye P, Isacson O, Brownell, Brownell AL (1992) Parkinsonian signs in MPTP-treated monkeys are alleviated by the high efficacy D1 dopamine receptor agonist SKF 81297. Soc Neurosci Abstr 18: A395.6Google Scholar
  27. Martin GE, Bendesky RJ (1984) Mouse locomotor activity: an in vivo test for dopamine autoreceptor activation. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 229: 706–711Google Scholar
  28. Martin GE, Williams M, Pettibone DJ, Yarbough GG, Clineschmidt BV, Jones JH (1984) Pharmacologic profile of a novel potent direct-acting dopamine agonist, (+)-4-propyl-9-hydroxynaphthoxazine [(+)-PHNO]. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 230: 569–576Google Scholar
  29. Melia KF, Spealman RD (1991) Pharmacological characterization of the discriminative-stimulus effects of GBR 12909. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 258: 626–632Google Scholar
  30. Miczek KA, Gold LH (1983)d-Amphetamine in squirrel monkeys of different social status: effects on social and agonistic behavior, locomotion, and stereotypies. Psychopharmacology 81: 183–190Google Scholar
  31. Miczek KA, Yoshimura H (1982) Disruption of primate social behavior byd-amphetamine and cocaine: differential antagonism by antipsychotics. Psychopharmacology 76: 163–171Google Scholar
  32. Molloy AG, Waddington JL (1984) Dopaminergic behaviour stereospecifically promoted by the D1 agonist R-SK&F 38393 and selectively blocked by the D1 antagonist SCH 23390. Psychopharmacology 82: 409–410Google Scholar
  33. Murray AM, Waddington JL (1990) New putative selective agonists at the D-1 receptor: Behavioral and neurochemical comparison of CY 208-243 with SK&F 101384 and SK&F 103243. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 35: 105–110Google Scholar
  34. O'Boyle KM, Gaitanopoulous DE, Brenner M, Waddington JL (1989) Agonist and antagonist properties of benzazepine and thienopyridine derivatives at the D1 dopamine receptor. Neuropharmacology 28: 401–405Google Scholar
  35. Pellon R, Katz JL (1991) Scratching induced by dopamine D-2 agonists in squirrel monkeys. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 39: 244Google Scholar
  36. Poignant JC, Avril A (1978) Pharmacological studies on drugs acting on social behavior of the squirrel monkey. Arzneimittelforschung 28: 267–271Google Scholar
  37. Pugh MT, O'Boyle KM, Molloy AG, Waddington JL (1985) Effects of the putative D-1 antagonist SCH 23390 on stereotyped behavior induced by the D-2 agonist RU 24213. Psychopharmacology 87: 308–312Google Scholar
  38. Reavill C, Bond B, Overend P, Hunter AJ (1993) Pharmacological characterization of the discriminative stimulus properties of the dopamine D1 agonist, SKF 81297. Behav Pharmacol 4: 135–146Google Scholar
  39. Ridley RM, Baker HF, Scraggs PR (1979) The time course of the behavioral effects of amphetamine and their reversal by haloperidol in a primate species. Biol Psychiatry 14: 753–765Google Scholar
  40. Rosengarten H, Schweitzer JW, Friedhoff AJ (1983) Induction of oral dyskinesias in naive rats by D1 stimulation. Life Sci 33: 2479–3482Google Scholar
  41. Rosenzweig-Lipson S, Bergman J (1993a) Discriminative-stimulus effects of cocaine and the high-efficacy D1 agonist SKF 81297 in squirrel monkeys. NIDA Res Monogr 132: 253Google Scholar
  42. Rosenzweig-Lipson S, Bergman J (1993b) Modification of the behavioral efects of the selective dopamine D2 agonist (+)-PHNO by dopamine antagonists in monkeys. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 265: 1039–1046Google Scholar
  43. Rosenzweig-Lipson S, Bergman J (1993c) Dopamine D1 receptor involvement in the discriminative-stimulus effects of SKF 81297 in squirrel monkeys. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 267: 765–775Google Scholar
  44. Rupniak NMJ, Tye SJ, Jennings CA, Loper AE, Bondi JV, Hichens M, Hand E, Iversen SD, Stahl SM (1989) Antiparkinsonian efficacy of a novel transdermal delivery system for (+)-PHNO in MPTP-treated squirrel monkeys. Neurology 39: 329–335Google Scholar
  45. Rupniak NMJ, Boyce S, Steventon M, Iversen SD (1992) Weak antiparkinsonian activity of the D1 agonist C-APB (SKF 82958) and lack of synergism with a D2 agonist in primates. Clin Neuropharmacol 15: 307–309Google Scholar
  46. Schlemmer RF, McGuinness DJ, Davis JM (1989) The comparative behavioral effects of the D1 agonist SKF 38393 and the D2 agonist quinpirole in selected members of primate social colonies. Soc Neurosci Abstr 15: A283.2Google Scholar
  47. Snedecor GW, Cochran WG (1967) Statistical methods. Iowa University Press, Ames, IowaGoogle Scholar
  48. Sokoloff P, Giros B, Martres M-P, Bouthenet ML, Schwartz J-C (1990) Molecular cloning and characterization of a novel dopamine (D3) receptor as a target of neuroleptics. Nature 347: 146–151Google Scholar
  49. Spealman RD (1990) Antagonism of behavioral effects of cocaine by selective dopamine receptor blockers. Psychopharmacology 101: 142–145Google Scholar
  50. Spealman RD, Bergman J, Madras BK, Melia KF (1991) Discriminative-stimulus effects of cocaine in squirrel monkeys: Involvement of dopamine receptor subtypes. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 258: 945–953Google Scholar
  51. Suen HK, Ary D (1989) Analyzing quantitative behavioral observation data. Lawrence Erlbaum, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  52. Vermeulen RJ, Drukarch B, Sahadat MCR, Goosen C, Wolters EC, Stoof JC (1993) The selective dopamine D1 receptor agonist, SKF 81297, stimulates motor behavior of MPTP-lesioned monkeys. Eur J Pharmacol 235: 143–147Google Scholar
  53. Waddington JL, Molloy AG, O'Boyle KM, Mashurano M (1986) Motor consequences of D-1 receptor stimulation and blockade. Clin Neuropharmacol 9: 20–22Google Scholar
  54. Weathersby RT, Appel JB (1986) Dopamine D2 receptor mediation of the discriminative-stimulus properties of LY 171555 (quinpirole). Eur J Pharmacol 132: 87–91Google Scholar
  55. Weinstock J, Wilson JW, Ladd DL, Brush CK, Pfeiffer FR, Kuo GY, Holden KG, Yim NCF, Hahn RA, Wardell JR, Tobia AJ, Setler PE, Sarau HM, Ridley PT (1980) Separation of potent central and renal dopamine agonist activity in substituted 6-chloro-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-7,8-dihydroxy-1-phenyl-1H-3-benzazepines. J Med Chem 23: 973–975Google Scholar
  56. Witkin JM, Schindler CW, Tella SR, Goldberg SR (1991) Interaction of haloperidol and SCH 23390 with cocaine and dopamine receptor subtype-selective agonists on schedule-controlled behavior of squirrel monkeys. Psychopharmacology 104: 425–431Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sharon Rosenzweig-Lipson
    • 1
  • Paul Hesterberg
    • 2
  • Jack Bergman
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyHarvard UniversityCambridgeUSA
  2. 2.Harvard Medical School, NERPRCSouthboroughUSA

Personalised recommendations