Skip to main content
Log in

Discriminative stimulus and subjective effects of theobromine and caffeine in humans

  • Original Investigations
  • Published:
Psychopharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Theobromine versus placebo discrimination and caffeine versus placebo discrimination were studied in two consecutive experiments in seven volunteers who abstained from methylxanthines. Daily sessions involved PO double-blind ingestion of two sets of capsules sequentially, one of which contained drug and the other placebo. Subjects attempted to identify, and were later informed, which set of capsules contained the drug. In each experiment subjects were exposed to progressively lower doses. Five subjects acquired the theobromine discrimination; the lowest dose discriminated ranged from 100 to 560 mg. All seven subjects acquired the caffeine discrimination; the lowest dose discriminated ranged from 1.8 to 178 mg. A final experiment evaluated subjective effect ratings following 560 mg theobromine, 178 mg caffeine and placebo, which were administered double-blind in capsules once daily, five times each in mixed sequence. Caffeine produced changes in both group and individual ratings (e.g. increased well-being, energy, social disposition and alert). Theobromine did not produce changes in group ratings but changed ratings in some subjects. Across subjects, sensitivity to caffeine discriminative effects in the discrimination experiment correlated significantly with the number and magnitude of caffeine subjective effects in the final experiment. This study documents modest discriminative effects of theobromine in humans, but the basis of the discrimination is unclear. This study suggests that commonly consumed cocoa products contain behaviorally active doses of caffeine and possibly theobromine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barone JJ, Roberts H (1984) Human consumption of caffeine. In: Dews PB (ed) Caffeine: perspectives from recent research. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 59–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Batterman RC, Grossman AJ, Dubinsky J, Mouratoff G (1959) Re-evaluation of the usefulness of theobromine calcium gluconate for the management of congestive heart failure and anginal syndrome. Int Rec Med 172:318–323

    Google Scholar 

  • Beccari E (1936) Massen-vergiftung durch theobromin-derivate. Fühner-Weilands Sammlung von Vergiftungsfällen 7:77–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer B, Chasin M, Clody DE, Vogel JR, Horovitz ZP (1972) Cyclic adenosine monophosphate phosphodiesterase in brain: effect on anxiety. Science 176:428–430

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumgart HL, Gilligan DR, Levy RC, Brown MG, Volk MC (1934) Action of diuretic drugs: I. Action of diuretics in normal persons. Arch Int Med 54:40–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunk SF, Ferguson RK, Toubes DB, Leaverton PE, Nordschow CD, Wilson WR (1973) A teaching format in clinical pharmacology. Comparison of two xanthines and a placebo. J Clin Pharmacol 13:121–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Carney JM (1982) Effects of caffeine, theophylline and theobromine on scheduled controlled responding in rats. Br J Pharmacol 75:451–454

    Google Scholar 

  • Carney JM, Holloway FA, Modrow HE (1985) Discriminative stimulus properties of methylxanthines and their metabolites in rats. Life Sci 36:913–920

    Google Scholar 

  • Carney JM, Cao W, Logan L, Rennert OM, Seale TW (1986) Differential antagonism of the behavioral depressant and hypothermic effects of 5′-(N-ethylcarboxamide) adenosine by theobromine. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 25:769–773

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa PT, Jr, McCrae RR (1985) The NEO personality inventory manual. Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc., Odessa, Fla.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorfman LJ, Jarvik ME (1970) Comparative stimulant and diuretic actions of caffeine and theobromine in man. Clin Pharmacol Ther 11:869–872

    Google Scholar 

  • Fries JH (1978) Chocolate: a review of published reports of allergic and other deleterious effects, real or presumed. Ann Allergy 41:196–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibb CM, Davies PTG, Glover V, Steiner TJ, Rose FC, Sandler M (1991) Chocolate is a migraine-provoking agent. Cephalalgia 11:93–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths RR, Mumford GK (1994) Caffeine — a drug of abuse? In: Bloom FE, Kupfer DJ (eds) Psychopharmacology: the fourth generation of progress. Raven, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths RR, Woodson PP (1988) Reinforcing properties of caffeine: studies in humans and laboratory animals. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 29:419–427

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths RR, Evans SM, Heishman SJ, Preston KL, Sannerud CA, Wolf B, Woodson PP (1990a) Low-dose caffeine discrimination in humans. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 252:970–978

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths RR, Evans SM, Heishman SJ, Preston KL, Sannerud CA, Wolf B, Woodson PP (1990b) Low-dose caffeine physical dependence in humans. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 255:1123–1132

    Google Scholar 

  • Herz A, Neteler B, Teschemacher HJ (1968) Vergleichende untersuchungen über zentrale wirkungen von xanthinderivaten in hinblick auf deren stoffwechsel und verteilung im organismus. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmakol Exp Pathol 261:486–502

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtzman SG (1986) Discriminative stimulus properties of caffeine in the rat: noradrenergic mediation. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 239:706–714

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishay JS, Paniry VA (1979) Effects of caffeine and various xanthines on hornets and bees. Psychopharmacology 65:299–309

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacob P, III, Wilson M, Benowitz NL (1981) Improved gas chromatographic method for determination of nicotine and cotinine in biologic fluids. J Chromatogr 222:61–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Katims JJ, Annau Z, Snyder SH (1983) Interactions in the behavioral effects of methylxanthines and adenosine derivatives. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 227:167–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuribara H, Tadokoro S (1992) Behavioral effects of cocoa and its main active compound theobromine: evaluation by ambulatory activity and discrete avoidance in mice. Jpn J Alcohol Drug Depend 27:168–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Lickint F (1938) Kakaogenuß und kopfschmerz. Deutsche Med Wochenschr 64:1545–1546

    Google Scholar 

  • Overton DA (1984) State dependent learning and drug discriminations. In: Iversen LL, Iversen SD, Snyder SH (eds) Handbook of psychopharmacology, Vol. 18. Plenum, New York London, pp 59–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Pao EM, Fleming KH, Guenther PM, Mickle SJ (1982) Foods commonly consumed by individuals: amount per day and per eating occasion. US Department of Agriculture, Nutrition Information Service, Home Economic Research Report, SUDOC #A1.87:44

  • Preston KL, Bigelow GE (1991) Subjective and discriminative effects of drugs. Behav Pharmacol 2:293–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Raebel MA, Black J (1984) The caffeine controversy: what are the facts? Hosp Pharm 19:257–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Samele C, Shine PJ, Stolerman IP (1992) Forty years of drug discrimination research: a bibliography for 1951–1991; 10th anniversary edition. Institute of Psychiatry, London (Available from Stolerman IP, Section of Behavioural Pharmacology, Institute of Psychiatry, De Crespigny Park, London SE5 8AF, UK)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandler M, Youdim MBH, Hanington E (1974) A phenylethylamine oxidising defect in migraine. Nature 250:335–337

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuster CR, Johanson CE (1988) Relationship between the discriminative stimulus properties and subjective effects of drugs. In: Colpaert FC, Balster RL (eds) Transduction mechanisms of drug stimuli. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 161–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Shively CA, Tarka SM (1984) Methylxanthine composition and consumption patterns of cocoa and chocolate products. In: Spiller GA (ed) The methylxanthine beverages and foods: chemistry, consumption, and health effects. Liss, New York, pp 149–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman K, Griffiths RR (1992) Low-dose caffeine discrimination and self-reported mood effects in normal volunteers. J Exp Anal Behav 57:91–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder SH, Katims JJ, Annau Z, Bruns RF, Daly JW (1981) Adenosine receptors and behavioral actions of methylxanthines. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 78:3260–3264

    Google Scholar 

  • Spielberger CD, Gorsuch RI, Lushene RE (1970) STAI manual for the state-trait anxiety inventory (“self-evaluation questionnaire”). Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprügel W, Mitznegg P, Heim F (1977) The influence of caffeine and theobromine on locomotive activity and the brain cGMP/cAMP ratio in white mice. Biochem Pharmacol 26:1723–1724

    Google Scholar 

  • Stavric B (1988) Methylxanthines: toxicity to humans. 3. Theobromine, paraxanthine and the combined effects of methylxanthines. Food Chem Toxicol 26:725–733

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarka SM (1982) The toxicology of cocoa and methylxanthines: a review of the literature. Crit Rev Toxicol 9:275–312

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mumford, G.K., Evans, S.M., Kaminski, B.J. et al. Discriminative stimulus and subjective effects of theobromine and caffeine in humans. Psychopharmacology 115, 1–8 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02244744

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02244744

Key words

Navigation