Abstract
Theobromine versus placebo discrimination and caffeine versus placebo discrimination were studied in two consecutive experiments in seven volunteers who abstained from methylxanthines. Daily sessions involved PO double-blind ingestion of two sets of capsules sequentially, one of which contained drug and the other placebo. Subjects attempted to identify, and were later informed, which set of capsules contained the drug. In each experiment subjects were exposed to progressively lower doses. Five subjects acquired the theobromine discrimination; the lowest dose discriminated ranged from 100 to 560 mg. All seven subjects acquired the caffeine discrimination; the lowest dose discriminated ranged from 1.8 to 178 mg. A final experiment evaluated subjective effect ratings following 560 mg theobromine, 178 mg caffeine and placebo, which were administered double-blind in capsules once daily, five times each in mixed sequence. Caffeine produced changes in both group and individual ratings (e.g. increased well-being, energy, social disposition and alert). Theobromine did not produce changes in group ratings but changed ratings in some subjects. Across subjects, sensitivity to caffeine discriminative effects in the discrimination experiment correlated significantly with the number and magnitude of caffeine subjective effects in the final experiment. This study documents modest discriminative effects of theobromine in humans, but the basis of the discrimination is unclear. This study suggests that commonly consumed cocoa products contain behaviorally active doses of caffeine and possibly theobromine.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barone JJ, Roberts H (1984) Human consumption of caffeine. In: Dews PB (ed) Caffeine: perspectives from recent research. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 59–73
Batterman RC, Grossman AJ, Dubinsky J, Mouratoff G (1959) Re-evaluation of the usefulness of theobromine calcium gluconate for the management of congestive heart failure and anginal syndrome. Int Rec Med 172:318–323
Beccari E (1936) Massen-vergiftung durch theobromin-derivate. Fühner-Weilands Sammlung von Vergiftungsfällen 7:77–80
Beer B, Chasin M, Clody DE, Vogel JR, Horovitz ZP (1972) Cyclic adenosine monophosphate phosphodiesterase in brain: effect on anxiety. Science 176:428–430
Blumgart HL, Gilligan DR, Levy RC, Brown MG, Volk MC (1934) Action of diuretic drugs: I. Action of diuretics in normal persons. Arch Int Med 54:40–79
Brunk SF, Ferguson RK, Toubes DB, Leaverton PE, Nordschow CD, Wilson WR (1973) A teaching format in clinical pharmacology. Comparison of two xanthines and a placebo. J Clin Pharmacol 13:121–126
Carney JM (1982) Effects of caffeine, theophylline and theobromine on scheduled controlled responding in rats. Br J Pharmacol 75:451–454
Carney JM, Holloway FA, Modrow HE (1985) Discriminative stimulus properties of methylxanthines and their metabolites in rats. Life Sci 36:913–920
Carney JM, Cao W, Logan L, Rennert OM, Seale TW (1986) Differential antagonism of the behavioral depressant and hypothermic effects of 5′-(N-ethylcarboxamide) adenosine by theobromine. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 25:769–773
Costa PT, Jr, McCrae RR (1985) The NEO personality inventory manual. Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc., Odessa, Fla.
Dorfman LJ, Jarvik ME (1970) Comparative stimulant and diuretic actions of caffeine and theobromine in man. Clin Pharmacol Ther 11:869–872
Fries JH (1978) Chocolate: a review of published reports of allergic and other deleterious effects, real or presumed. Ann Allergy 41:196–207
Gibb CM, Davies PTG, Glover V, Steiner TJ, Rose FC, Sandler M (1991) Chocolate is a migraine-provoking agent. Cephalalgia 11:93–95
Griffiths RR, Mumford GK (1994) Caffeine — a drug of abuse? In: Bloom FE, Kupfer DJ (eds) Psychopharmacology: the fourth generation of progress. Raven, New York
Griffiths RR, Woodson PP (1988) Reinforcing properties of caffeine: studies in humans and laboratory animals. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 29:419–427
Griffiths RR, Evans SM, Heishman SJ, Preston KL, Sannerud CA, Wolf B, Woodson PP (1990a) Low-dose caffeine discrimination in humans. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 252:970–978
Griffiths RR, Evans SM, Heishman SJ, Preston KL, Sannerud CA, Wolf B, Woodson PP (1990b) Low-dose caffeine physical dependence in humans. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 255:1123–1132
Herz A, Neteler B, Teschemacher HJ (1968) Vergleichende untersuchungen über zentrale wirkungen von xanthinderivaten in hinblick auf deren stoffwechsel und verteilung im organismus. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmakol Exp Pathol 261:486–502
Holtzman SG (1986) Discriminative stimulus properties of caffeine in the rat: noradrenergic mediation. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 239:706–714
Ishay JS, Paniry VA (1979) Effects of caffeine and various xanthines on hornets and bees. Psychopharmacology 65:299–309
Jacob P, III, Wilson M, Benowitz NL (1981) Improved gas chromatographic method for determination of nicotine and cotinine in biologic fluids. J Chromatogr 222:61–70
Katims JJ, Annau Z, Snyder SH (1983) Interactions in the behavioral effects of methylxanthines and adenosine derivatives. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 227:167–173
Kuribara H, Tadokoro S (1992) Behavioral effects of cocoa and its main active compound theobromine: evaluation by ambulatory activity and discrete avoidance in mice. Jpn J Alcohol Drug Depend 27:168–179
Lickint F (1938) Kakaogenuß und kopfschmerz. Deutsche Med Wochenschr 64:1545–1546
Overton DA (1984) State dependent learning and drug discriminations. In: Iversen LL, Iversen SD, Snyder SH (eds) Handbook of psychopharmacology, Vol. 18. Plenum, New York London, pp 59–127
Pao EM, Fleming KH, Guenther PM, Mickle SJ (1982) Foods commonly consumed by individuals: amount per day and per eating occasion. US Department of Agriculture, Nutrition Information Service, Home Economic Research Report, SUDOC #A1.87:44
Preston KL, Bigelow GE (1991) Subjective and discriminative effects of drugs. Behav Pharmacol 2:293–313
Raebel MA, Black J (1984) The caffeine controversy: what are the facts? Hosp Pharm 19:257–267
Samele C, Shine PJ, Stolerman IP (1992) Forty years of drug discrimination research: a bibliography for 1951–1991; 10th anniversary edition. Institute of Psychiatry, London (Available from Stolerman IP, Section of Behavioural Pharmacology, Institute of Psychiatry, De Crespigny Park, London SE5 8AF, UK)
Sandler M, Youdim MBH, Hanington E (1974) A phenylethylamine oxidising defect in migraine. Nature 250:335–337
Schuster CR, Johanson CE (1988) Relationship between the discriminative stimulus properties and subjective effects of drugs. In: Colpaert FC, Balster RL (eds) Transduction mechanisms of drug stimuli. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 161–175
Shively CA, Tarka SM (1984) Methylxanthine composition and consumption patterns of cocoa and chocolate products. In: Spiller GA (ed) The methylxanthine beverages and foods: chemistry, consumption, and health effects. Liss, New York, pp 149–178
Silverman K, Griffiths RR (1992) Low-dose caffeine discrimination and self-reported mood effects in normal volunteers. J Exp Anal Behav 57:91–107
Snyder SH, Katims JJ, Annau Z, Bruns RF, Daly JW (1981) Adenosine receptors and behavioral actions of methylxanthines. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 78:3260–3264
Spielberger CD, Gorsuch RI, Lushene RE (1970) STAI manual for the state-trait anxiety inventory (“self-evaluation questionnaire”). Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, Calif.
Sprügel W, Mitznegg P, Heim F (1977) The influence of caffeine and theobromine on locomotive activity and the brain cGMP/cAMP ratio in white mice. Biochem Pharmacol 26:1723–1724
Stavric B (1988) Methylxanthines: toxicity to humans. 3. Theobromine, paraxanthine and the combined effects of methylxanthines. Food Chem Toxicol 26:725–733
Tarka SM (1982) The toxicology of cocoa and methylxanthines: a review of the literature. Crit Rev Toxicol 9:275–312
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mumford, G.K., Evans, S.M., Kaminski, B.J. et al. Discriminative stimulus and subjective effects of theobromine and caffeine in humans. Psychopharmacology 115, 1–8 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02244744
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02244744