Advertisement

Psychopharmacology

, Volume 101, Issue 4, pp 465–471 | Cite as

Role of D-1 and D-2 receptor stimulation in sensitization to amphetamine-induced circling behavior and in expression and extinction of the Pavlovian conditioned response

  • Kelly L. Drew
  • Stanley D. Glick
Original Investigations

Abstract

Circling behavior was measured in female rats treated with amphetamine (1.25 mg/kgd-amphetamine sulfate, IP) on 3 consecutive days. On days 4 and 5 saline was substituted for amphetamine. While the amphetamine-induced response was attenuated by both a D-1 (SCH 23390) and a D-2 (metoclopramide) antagonist, sensitization to amphetamine was attenuated by the D-1 antagonist only. In addition, expression of a placebo-like response observed on day 4 (characterized previously as a Pavlovian conditioned response) was attenuated by both the D-1 and D-2 antagonists without disrupting extinction of the response.

Key words

Amphetamine sensitization Pavlovian conditioning Amphetamine-induced circling behavior SCH 23390 Metoclopramide 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Becker JB, Robinson TE, Lorenz KA (1982) Sex differences and estrous cycle variations in amphetamine-elicited rotational behavior. Eur J Pharmacol 80:65–72Google Scholar
  2. Beninger RJ, Hahn BL (1983) Pimozide blocks establishment but not expression of amphetamine-produced environment-specific conditioning. Science 220:1304–1306Google Scholar
  3. Beninger RJ, Herz RS (1986) Pimozide blocks establishment but not expression of cocaine-produced environment-specific conditioning. Life Sci 38:1425–1431Google Scholar
  4. Brass CA, Glick SD (1981) Sex differences in drug-induced rotation in two strains of rats. Brain Res 223:229–234Google Scholar
  5. Braun AR, Chase TN (1986) Obligatory D-1/D-2 receptor interaction in the generation of dopamine agonist related behaviors. Eur J Pharmacol 131:301–306Google Scholar
  6. Christensen AV, Arnt J, Hyttel J, Larsen J-J, Svendsen O (1984) Pharmacological effects of a specific dopamine D-1 antagonist SCH 23390 in comparison with neuroleptics. Life Sci 34:1529–1540Google Scholar
  7. Costall B, Domeney AM, Gunning SJ, Kelly ME, Naylor RJ, Nohria V, Owera-Atepo JB, Simpson KM, Tan CCW, Tattersall D (1987). The action of dazopride to enhance gastric emptying and block emesis. Neuropharmacology 26:669–677Google Scholar
  8. De Cuyper H, Bollen J, van Praag HM Verstraeten D (1986) Pharmacokinetics and therapeutic efficacy of haloperidol decanoate after loading dose administration. Br J Psychiatry 148:560–566Google Scholar
  9. de Witt H, Stewart J (1981) Reinstatement of cocaine-reinforced responding in the rat. Psychopharmacology 75:134–143Google Scholar
  10. Drew KL, Glick SD (1987) Classical conditioning of amphetamine-induced lateralized and nonlateralized activity in rats. Psychopharmacology 92:52–57Google Scholar
  11. Drew KL, Glick SD (1988) Characterization of the associative nature of sensitization to amphetamine-induced circling behavior and of the environment dependent placebo-like response. Psychopharmacology 95:482–487Google Scholar
  12. Drew KL, Glick SD (1989) Environment dependent sensitization to amphetamine-induced circling behavior. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 31:705–708Google Scholar
  13. Ellinwood EH (1981) Assault and homicide associated with amphetamine abuse. Am J Psychiatry 127:1170–1175Google Scholar
  14. Filloux FM, Wamsley JK, Dawson TM (1987) Presynaptic and postsynaptic D-1 dopamine receptors in the nigrostriatal system of the rat brain: a quantitative autoradiographic study using the selective D-1 antagonist [3H]SCH 23390. Brain Res 408:205–209Google Scholar
  15. Gawin FH (1988) Chronic neuropharmacology of cocaine: progress in pharmacotherapy. J Clin Psychiatry [Suppl 2] 49:11–16Google Scholar
  16. Glick SD, Shapiro RM, Drew KD, Hinds PA, Carlson JN (1986) Differences in spontaneous and amphetamine-induced rotational behavior, and in sensitization to amphetamine, among Sprague-Dawley derived rats from different sources. Physiol Behav 38:67–70Google Scholar
  17. Greenstein S, Glick SD (1975) Improved automated apparatus for recording rotation (circling behavior) in rats or mice. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 3:507–510Google Scholar
  18. Hand TH, Kasser RJ, Wang Ry (1987) Effects of acute thioridazine, metoclopramide and SCH 23390 on the basal activity of A9 and A10 dopamine cells. Eur J Pharmacol 137:251–255Google Scholar
  19. Hyttel J (1978) Effects of neuroleptics on 3-H haloperidol and 3-Hcis-(z)-flupenthixol binding and on adenylate cyclase activity in vitro. Life Sci 23:551–556Google Scholar
  20. Jerussi TP, Glick SD (1976) Drug-induced rotation in rats without lesions: behavioral and neurochemical indices of a normal asymmetry in nigro-striatal function. Psychopharmacology 47:249–260Google Scholar
  21. Kalivas PW Weber B (1988) Amphetamine injection into the ventral mesencephalon sensitizes rats to peripheral amphetamine and cocaine. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 245(3):1095–1102Google Scholar
  22. Kebabian JW Calne DB (1979) Multiple receptors for dopamine. Nature 277:93–96Google Scholar
  23. Lesko LM, Fischman MW, Javaid JI, Davis JM (1982) Intravenous cocaine psychosis. N Engl J Med 307:1153Google Scholar
  24. Lin-Chu G, Robinson TE, Becker JB (1985) Sensitization of rotational behavior produced by a single exposure to cocaine. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 22:901–903Google Scholar
  25. Maidment NT, Marsden CA (1987) Acute administration of clozapine, thioridazine and metoclopramide increases extracellular DOPAC and decreases extracellular 5-HIAA, measured in the nucleus accumbens and striatum of the rat using in vivo voltammetry. Neuropharmacology 26:187–193Google Scholar
  26. Meller E, Kuga S, Friedhoff AJ, Goldstein M (1985) Selective D-2 dopamine receptor agonists prevent catalepsy induced by SCH 23390, a selective D-1 antagonist. Life Sci 36:1857–1864Google Scholar
  27. O'Brien CP, Childress AR, Arndt IO, McLellan AT, Woody GE, Maany I (1988) Pharmacological and behavioral treatments of cocaine dependence: controlled studies. J Clin Psychiatry [Suppl 2] 49:17–22Google Scholar
  28. Poncelet M, Dangoumau L, Soubrie P, Simon P (1987) Effects of neuroleptic drugs, clonidine and lithium on the expression of conditioned excitation in rats. Psychopharmacology 92:393–397Google Scholar
  29. Porceddu ML, Giorgi O, Ongini E, Mele S, Biggio G (1986)3H-SCH 23390 binding sites in the rat substantia nigra: evidence for a presynaptic localization and innervation by dopamine. Life Sci 39:321–328Google Scholar
  30. Robinson TE (1984) Behavioral sensitization: characterization of enduring changes in rotational behavior produced by intermittent injections of amphetamine in male and female rats. Psychopharmacology 84:466–475Google Scholar
  31. Robinson TE, Becker JB (1986) Enduring changes in brain and behavior produced by chronic amphetamine administration: a review and evaluation of animal models of amphetamine psychosis. Brain Res Rev 11:157–198Google Scholar
  32. Robinson TE, Becker JB, Ramirez VD (1980) Sex differences in amphetamine-elicited rotational behavior and the lateralization of striatal dopamine in rats. Brain Res Bull 5:539–545Google Scholar
  33. Robinson TE, Becker JB, Presty SK (1982) Long-term facilitation of amphetamine-induced rotational behavior and striatal dopamine release produced by a single exposure to amphetamine: sex differences. Brain Res 253:231–241Google Scholar
  34. Tilson HA, Rech RH (1973) Conditioned drug effects and absence of tolerance tod-amphetamine induced motor activity. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 1:149–153Google Scholar
  35. Ujike J, Onoue T, Akiyama K, Hamamura T, Otsuki S (1989) Effects of selective D-1 and D-2 dopamine antagonists on development of methamphetamine-induced behavioral sensitization. Psychopharmacology 98:89–92Google Scholar
  36. Vezina P, Stewart J (1987) Effects of D-1 and D-2 dopamine receptor antagonists on the development of sensitization to the locomotor effect of morphine and amphetamine. Soc Neurosci Abstr 13:450Google Scholar
  37. Zimmerberg B, Strumpf AJ, Glick SD (1978) Cerebral asymmetry and left-right discrimination. Brain Res 140:194–196Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kelly L. Drew
    • 1
  • Stanley D. Glick
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Pharmacology and ToxicologyAlbany Medical CollegeAlbanyUSA

Personalised recommendations