Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Different patterns of behavior produced by haloperidol, pentobarbital, and dantrolene in tests of unconditioned locomotion and operant responding

  • Original Investigations
  • Published:
Psychopharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Three motor-impairing drugs with different putative mechanisms of action (haloperidol 0.00, 0.075, 0.15, 0.30 mg/kg IP; pentobarbital 0.00, 4.5, 9, 12 mg/kg IP; and dantrolene 0.00, 5, 7.5, 10 mg/kg IP) produced strikingly similar patterns of dose-dependent attenuation in unconditioned locomotor behavior. However, the same drugs and doses produced highly divergent patterns of disruption when tested using different groups of rats in a food-rewarded operant task, which included both response initiation and maintenance components (FR1-FR1 two lever chain). Haloperidol animals began the session as fast as vehicle animals and slowed dose-dependently across trials; pentobarbital animals started off significantly slower than controls but soon achieved comparable speeds; and dantrolene animals were slower throughout the session. These results suggest that the observed neuroleptic-induced deterioration in responding over trials, especially in response initiation, was not simply a result of motoric disruption. Rather, the profile of this deterioration is consistent with the anhedonia hypothesis of neuroleptic action and supports the view that dopamine neurons are involved in the biological basis of food reward.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baldessarini RJ (1979) The “neuroleptic” antipsychotic drugs 2. Neurologic side effects. Postgrad Med 65:108–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldessarini RJ (1985) Drugs and the treatment of psychiatric disorders. In: Gilman AG, Goodman LS, Rall TW, Murad F (eds) The pharmacological basis of therapeutics. MacMillan, New York, pp 387–445

    Google Scholar 

  • Beninger RJ, Mason ST, Phillips AG, Fibiger HC (1980) The use of conditioned suppression to evaluate the nature of neuroleptic-induced avoidance deficits. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 213:623–627

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger PA, Elliot GR, Barchas JD (1978) Neuroregulators and schizophrenia. In: Lipton MA, DiMascio A, Killam KF (eds) Psychopharmacology: a generation of progress. Raven Press, New York, pp 1071–1082

    Google Scholar 

  • Costall B, Naylor RJ (1975) Detection of the neuroleptic properties of clozapine, sulpiride, and thioridazine. Psychopharmacologia 43:69–74

    Google Scholar 

  • DeRyck M, Schallert T, Teitelbaum P (1980) Morphine versus haloperidol catalepsy in the rats: a behavioral analysis of postural support mechanisms. Brain Res 201:143–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis KO (1982) Clinical and pharmacological experiences on dantrolene sodium. In: Benvenuti C (ed) Dantrolene sodium: new therapeutic approach to clinical problems of spasticity. Minerva Medica, Turin, pp 35–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis KO, Carpenter JF (1974) Mechanism of control of skeletal-muscle contraction by dantrolene sodium. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 55:362–369

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis KO, Castellion AW, Honkomp LJ, Wessels FL, Carpenter JF, Halliday RP (1973) Dantrolene, a direct acting skeletal muscle relaxant. J Pharm Sci 62:948–951

    Google Scholar 

  • Ettenberg A (1989) Dopamine, neuroleptics and reinforced behaviors. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 13:105–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Ettenberg A, Cinsavich SA, White N (1979) Performance effects with repeated-response measures during pimozide-produced dopamine receptor blockade. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 11:557–561

    Google Scholar 

  • Ettenberg A, Gonzales K, Fowler SC (1989) Progressive withinsession decrements in response duration observed in rats responding for food reinforcement under neuroleptic challenge. Soc Neurosci Abstr 15:55

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenton HM, Liebman JM (1982) Self-stimulation response decrement patterns differentiate clonidine, baclofen and dopamine antagonists from drugs causing performance deficit. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 17:1207–1212

    Google Scholar 

  • Fibiger HC, Zis AP, Phillips AG (1975) Haloperidol-induced disruption of conditioned avoidance responding: attenuation by prior training or by anticholinergic drugs. Eur J Pharmacol 30:309–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Fielding S, Lal H (1978) Behavioral actions of neuroleptics. In: Iverson LL, Iverson SD, Snyder SH (eds) Handbook of psychopharmacology, vol 10. Plenum Press, New York, pp 91–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Fouriezos G, Wise RA (1976) Pimozide-induced extinction of intracranial self-stimulation: response patterns rule out motor or performance deficits. Brain Res 103:377–380

    Google Scholar 

  • Fouriezos G, Hansson P, Wise RA (1978) Neuroleptic-induced attenuation of brain stimulation in rats. J Comp Physiol Psychol 92:661–671

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler SC (1991) Neuroleptics product within-session response decrements: facts and theories. Drug Dev Res (in press)

  • Fowler SC, Filewich RJ, Leberer MR (1977) Drug effects upon force and duration of response during fixed-ratio performance in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 6:421–426

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin KBJ, McCoy SN (1979) Pimozide-induced extinction in rats: stimulus control rules out motor deficit. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 11:71–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallistel CR, Davis AJ (1983) Affinity for the dopamine D2 receptor predicts neuroleptic potency in blocking the reinforcing effect of MFB stimulation. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 19:867–872

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallistel CR, Boytim M, Gomita Y, Klebanoff L (1982) Does pimozide block the reinforcing effect of brain stimulation? Pharmacol Biochem Behav 17:769–781

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerhardt S, Liebman J (1981) Differential effects of drug treatments on nose-poke and bar-press self-stimulation. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 15:767–771

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerhardt S, Prowse J, Liebman J (1982) Anxiolytic drugs selectively increase preferred duration of rewarding brain stimulation in a shuttlebox test. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 16:795–799

    Google Scholar 

  • Gramling SE, Fowler SC (1985) Effects of neuroleptics on rate and duration of operant versus reflexive licking in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 22:541–545

    Google Scholar 

  • Halpern JM, Canon J, Iorio LC (1986) Preclinical evaluation of deficits following hypnotic drug treatment. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 24:875–878

    Google Scholar 

  • Horvitz JC, Ettenberg A (1989) Haloperidol blocks the response-reinstating effects of food reward: a methodology for separating neuroleptic effects on reinforcement and motor processes. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 31:861–865

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornykiewicz O (1973) Parkinsonism induced by dopaminergic antagonists. In: Calne DB, Chase TN, Barbeau A (eds) Advances in neurology, vol 9. Raven Press, New York, pp 155–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Irwin S (1968) Anti-neurotics: Practical pharmacology of the sedative-hypnotics and minor tranquilizers. In: Efron DH (ed) Psychopharmacology: a review of progress 1957–1967. Public Health Service Publication 1836, Washington DC, pp 185–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen PAJ, Niemegeers CJE, Shellekens KHL, Dresse A, Lenaerts FM, Pinchard A, Schaper WKA, van Nueten JM, Verbrugger FJ (1968) Pimozide, a chemically novel, highly potent and orally long-acting neuroleptic drug. Arzneimittelforschung 18:261–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Khanna JM, Campanelli C, Le Ad, Kalant H (1987) Effect of raphe lesions on the development of chronic tolerance to pentobarbital and cross-tolerance to ethanol. Psychopharmacology 91:473–478

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebman JM (1983) Discriminating between reward and performance: a critical review of intracranial self-stimulation methodology. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 7:45–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Ljungberg T (1987) Blockade by neuroleptics of water intake and operant responding for water in the rat: anhedonia, motor deficit, or both? Pharmacol Biochem Behav 27:341–350

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsden CD, Tarsy D, Baldessarini RJ (1975) Spontaneous and drug-induced movement disorders in psychiatric patients. In: Benson DF, Blumer D (eds) Psychiatric aspects of neurologic disease. Grune and Stratton, New York, pp 219–265

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin WR, Thompson WO, Fraser HF (1974) Comparison of graded single intramuscular doses of morphine and pentobarbital in man. Clin Pharmacol Ther 6:623–630

    Google Scholar 

  • Olds ME (1972) Alterations by centrally acting drugs of the suppression of self-stimulation behavior in the rat by tetrabenazine, physostigmine, chlorpromazine and pentobarbital. Psychopharmacologia 25:299–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Patti F, Giammona G, Reggio A, Maccagnano C, Rampello L, di Giorgio RM, Panico AM, Nicoletti F (1981) Effects of dantrolene sodium on GABAergic activity in spinal cord, corpus striatum, substantia nigra and cerebral cortex in rat. Acta Neurol (Napoli) 36:384–388

    Google Scholar 

  • Salamone JD (1987) The actions of neuroleptic drugs on appetitive instrumental behaviors. In: Iverson LL, Iverson SD, Snyder SH (eds) Handbook of psychopharmacology, vol 19. Plenum Press, New York, pp 575–608

    Google Scholar 

  • Salamone JD (1988) Dopaminergic involvement in activational aspects of motivation: effects of haloperidol on schedule-induced activity, feeding, and foraging in rats. Psychobiology 16:196–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Shader RI, DiMascio A (1970) Psychotropic drug side effects: chemical and theoretical perspectives. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Shull RN, Holloway FA (1986) Effects of methylphenidate on the spontaneous activity levels of rats with selective hippocampal system damage. Life Sci 38:1135–1141

    Google Scholar 

  • Skjoldager P, Fowler SC (1988) Effects of pimozide, across doses and within sessions, on discriminated lever release performance in rats. Psychopharmacology 96:21–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein L (1962) An analysis of stimulus-duration preference in self-stimulation of the brain. J Comp Physiol Psychol 55:405–414

    Google Scholar 

  • Tombaugh TN, Tombaugh JW, Anisman H (1979) Effects of dopamine receptor blockade on alimentary behaviors: home cage food consumption, magazine training, operant acquisition, and performance. Psychopharmacology 66:219–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Tombaugh TN, Anisman H, Tombaugh J (1980) Extinction and dopamine receptor blockade after intermittent reinforcement training: failure to observe functional equivalence. Psychopharmacology 70:19–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Tombaugh TN, Grandmaison LJ, Zito KA (1982) Establishment of secondary reinforcement in sign tracking and place preference tests following pimozide treatment. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 17:665–670

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward A, Chaffman MO, Sorkin EM (1986) Dantrolene. Drugs 32:130–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson PJ, Cox VC (1976) An analysis of barbiturate-induced eating and drinking in the rat. Physiol Psychol 4:325–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Wirtshafter D, Asin KE (1985) Haloperidol and nonreinforcement produce different patterns of response slowing in a food reinforced runway task. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 22:661–663

    Google Scholar 

  • Wise RA (1982) Neuroleptics and operant behavior: the anhedonia hypothesis. Behav Brain Sci 5:39–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Wise RA, Colle LM (1984) Pimozide attenuates free feeding: best scores analysis reveals a motivational deficit. Psychopharmacology 84:446–451

    Google Scholar 

  • Wise RA, Raptis L (1986) Effects of naloxone and pimozide on initiation and maintenance measures of free feeding. Brain Res 368:62–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Wise RA, Rompre P-P (1989) Brain dopamine and reward. Ann Rev Psychol 40:191–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Wise RA, Spindler J, de Wit H, Gerber GJ (1978) Neuroleptic-induced “anhedonia” in rats: pimozide blocks reward quality of food. Science 201:262–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolgin DL (1985) Forelimb placing and hopping reflexes in haloperidol- and morphine-treated cataleptic rats. Behav Neurosci 99:423–435

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of California, 93106, Santa Barbara, CA, USA

    Elizabeth O'Shea Hammond, Michael L. Torok & Aaron Ettenberg

Authors
  1. Elizabeth O'Shea Hammond
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michael L. Torok
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Aaron Ettenberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hammond, E.O., Torok, M.L. & Ettenberg, A. Different patterns of behavior produced by haloperidol, pentobarbital, and dantrolene in tests of unconditioned locomotion and operant responding. Psychopharmacology 104, 150–156 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02244170

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02244170

Key words

Search

Navigation