Skip to main content
Log in

A comparison of two methods of estimating a mean diurnal temperature curve during the daylight hours

Ein Vergleich von zwei Methoden zur Bestimmung der mittleren Tageskurve der Temperatur für die Tageszeit

  • Published:
Archiv für Meteorologie, Geophysik und Bioklimatologie, Serie B Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The accuracy of two methods of estimating a mean diurnal temperature curve during the daylight hours is examined by comparing calculated temperatures and monthly mean observed temperatures at 20 stations for each month. Both methods require monthly mean maximum and minimum temperatures as input data, as well as information on geographical location and time of year. The sensitivity of both methods to the temperature input data is examined in some detail.

Zusammenfassung

Die Genauigkeit von zwei Methoden zur Bestimmung der mittleren Temperaturtageskurve für die Stunden der Tageszeit wird für jeden Monat durch den Vergleich der berechneten Temperaturen mit den beobachteten Monatsmitteln der Temperatur an 20 Stationen geprüft. Beide Methoden erfordern Monatsmittel der Maxima und der Minima der Temperatur als Eingabedaten wie auch eine Information über die geographische Lage und über die Zeit im Jahr. Die Empfindlichkeit beider Methoden für die Eingabedaten der Temperatur wird im Detail untersucht.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anway, J. C., E. G. Brittain, H. W. Hunt, G. S. Innis, W. J. Parton, C. F. Rodell, and R. H. Sauer: Natural Resource Ecology Laboratory, Colorado State University. Tech. Report No. 156 (1972).

  2. Atmospheric Environment Service. Canada: Monthly Meteorological Summaries, 1974.

  3. Best, A. C., E. Knighting, R. H. Pedlow, and K. Stormonth: Temperature and Humidity Gradients in the First 100m Over South East England. Geophysical Memoirs 11/4, 26–27 (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  4. British Meteorol. Office: The Observatories' Year Book 1938.

  5. Bureau of Meteorology, Australia: A Study of Average Hourly Values of Temperatures, Relative Humidity and Saturation Deficit in the Australian Region, From Records of Capital City Bureaux. Pts 1, 2. Bulletin No. 35 (1945).

  6. Goodspeed, M. J.: Computer Routines for Solar Position, Daylength and Related Quantities. CSIRO Aust. Div. of Land Use Res. Tech. Memo. No. 75/11 (1975).

  7. Johnson, N. K.: A Study of the Vertical Gradient of Temperature in the Atmosphere Near the Ground. Geophysical Memoirs 5/6, 24–25 (1929).

    Google Scholar 

  8. New Zealand Meteorol. Service: Monthly Climatological Summaries for Invercargill, 1960–1969.

  9. New Zealand Meteorol. Service: Meteorological Observations for 1947.

  10. Royal Observatory, Hong Kong: Meteorological Results 1958, 1959, 1960. Part 1: Surface Observations.

  11. Walter, A.: Notes on the Utilization of Records From Third Order Climatological Stations for Agricultural Purposes. Ag. Met.4, 137–143 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Weather Bureau of South Africa: Meteorological Observations at Tristan da Cunha, 1943–1947.

  13. Weather Bureau of South Africa: Temperature and Relative Humidity, Hourly Values. Gough, 1956–1960.

  14. Weather Bureau of South Africa: Temperature and Relative Humidity, Hourly Values. Marion, 1956–1960.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

With 6 Figures

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Johnson, M.E., Fitzpatrick, E.A. A comparison of two methods of estimating a mean diurnal temperature curve during the daylight hours. Arch. Met. Geoph. Biokl. B. 25, 251–263 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02243056

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02243056

Keywords

Navigation