Skip to main content
Log in

Lactation responses of dairy cattle to concentrate feeding in the humid tropics

Responses De Vaches Laitieres En Fin De Lactation A Un Apport D'Aliment Concentre En Zone Tropicale Humide

Respuesta Lactea De Ganado Lechero A La Suplementacion Con Concentrados En El Tropico Humedo

  • Published:
Tropical Animal Health and Production Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Ten second lactation cows in late lactation were used in a 219 to 229 day trial to determine the influence of level of concentrate feeding on milk yield in the presence of abundant forage. Five cows were fed on a 2:1 (HH) milk-concentrate ratio throughout the trial while the other 5 were on a 4:1 (LL) milk-concentrate ratio.

Average daily milk production (kg/cow) were 14·6 and 13·1 for the HH and LL groups respectively; differences between means were non-significant (P=0.05). The mean butterfat content was 3·5% for both treatments. Significant differences in the efficiency of milk production favouring low concentrate feeding were observed. It was concluded that where forage is abundant and of fairly good quality (about 9% crude protein) only minimal concentrate feeding is required for dairy cows in late lactation.

Résumé

L'influence de l'apport d'un aliment concentré en supplément d'un fourage distribuéad libitum sur la production laitière en fin de 2e lactation a été testée sur dix vaches entre le 219e et le 299e jour de lactation.

Le concentré a été distribué à cinq vaches à un niveau haut (HH) de 0,5 kg/kg de lait produit et à cinq vaches à un niveau bas (LL) de 0,250 kg/kg de lait produit.

La production moyenne journalière a été respectivement de 14,6 kg et 13,1 kg et 13,1 kg, la différence n'étant pas significative (P 0,05). Le taux butyreux moyen a été de 35 p. 1000 pour les deux traitements.

Lorsque le fourrage est abondant et d'assez bonne qualité (9 p. 100 de protéines brutes) un apport minimal d'aliment concentré est suffisant pour des vaches en fin lactation.

Resumen

Se utilizaron 10 vacas al final de la segunda lactación, en un ensayo nutricional de 219–229 dias, para determinar la influencia en la producción láctea, de diferentes niveles de suplementación con concentrados, en presencia de abundante forraje. Cinco vacas recibieron leche-concentrado en la proporción de 2:1 (HH) a travéz del ensayo. Las otras cinco recibieron leche-concentrado en la proporción de 4:1 (LL).

Los promedios diarios de producción láctea (kg/cow) fueron de 14.6 y 13.1 para los grupos HH y LL respectivamente; las differencias entre medias no fueron significativas P-0.05). El contenido medio de mantequilla fué de 3.5% para ambos tratamientos.

Se observaron diferencias significativas relacionadas con la eficiencia en la producción láctea, favoreciendo la suplementación baja con concentrados. Se concluyó, que donde el forraje es abundante y de relativa buena calidad (9% proteina cruda), se requiere una suplementación minima con concentrados para vacas lecheras al final de la lactación.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Association of Official Agricultural Chemists (1965). 10th edn, Washington, DC.

  • Atwal, A. S. &Alhassan W. S. (1977). The dairy industry in Ghana—present and future. Proceedings of the 9th Animal Science Symposium. University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Broster, W. H. (1972).Dairy Science Abstracts,34, 265–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clifton, C. M. (1963).Journal of Dairy Science,46, 622–623.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, F. J. (1976).Animal Production,22, 175–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, T. W. (1965).Animal Production,7, 263–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gyawu, P. (1977). The dairy industry in Ghana—present and future. Proceedings of the 9th Animal Science Symposium, University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kesler, E. M. &Spahr, S. L. (1964).Journal of Dairy Science,47, 1122–1128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leaver, J. D., Campling, R. C. &Holmes, W. (1968).Dairy Science Abstracts,30, 355–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDowell, R. E. (1972).Improvement of Livestock Production in Warm Climates, W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, pp. 7–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, H. H., Hinners, S. W. &Bernett, R. C. (1966).Journal of Dairy Science,49, 110–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phipps, R. H. (1973).Tropical Agriculture,50, 329–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steel, R. G. D. &Torrie, J. H. (1960).Principles and Procedures Of Statistics. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 99–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, W. J., Emery, R. S. &Brown, L. D. (1974).Journal of Dairy Science,57, 463–471.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alhassan, W.S., Owusu, D.Y. Lactation responses of dairy cattle to concentrate feeding in the humid tropics. Trop Anim Health Prod 12, 171–176 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02242649

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02242649

Keywords

Navigation