Skip to main content
Log in

Responding to the World Conservation Strategy

  • Published:
Environmentalist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The nature, achievements and shortcomings of the World Conservation Strategy (WCS) are reviewed. In particular, the National Conservation Strategies (NCS) prepared in response to WCS are discussed, and the differences between developed and less developed countries are noted in this respect. Special attention is paid to the UK follow-up. It is concluded that more emphasis must be placed on popularizing WCS and on acquiring a more balanced appreciation of conservation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, R. (1980)How to Save the World. Kogan Page: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian DHAE (1982)National Conservation Stategy for Australia. Australian Department of Home Affairs and Environment, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centre for Economic and Environmental Development (CEED) (1984)Newsletter, December 1984.

  • Centre for Economic and Environmental Development (CEED) (1985)Newsletter, February/March, 1985.

  • Countryside Commission (1974)New Agricultural Landscapes. CCP 76.

  • Countryside Commission (1979)Upland Land Use in England and Wales. CCP 111.

  • Countryside Commission (1983)What Future for the Uplands? CCP 149.

  • Countryside Commission (1984a)Annual Report 1983–84. Cheltenham.

  • Countryside Commission (1984b)Agricultural Landscapes: a second look. CCP 168.

  • Countryside Commission (1984c)Agricultural Landscapes: an approach to their improvement. CCP 169

  • Countryside Commission (1984d)Agricultural Landscapes: a policy statement. CCP 173.

  • Countryside Commission (1984e)A Better Future for the Uplands. CCP 162.

  • Cynefin (1982)Cynefin — A Welsh Conservation Strategy. Conference Papers, Cardiff, 13–15 Dec. 1982. (Cynefin has been translated as ‘that part of the environment to which we belong’. It is the home, the refuge, the starting point from which our various thoughts and actions emerge, and the place to which we return for strength and renewal).

  • Ecos (1985)A Review of Conservation Volume 6 No. 1, pp. 54–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, Joan (1985) Environment and Development — still poles apart,Planner 71 (1), p. 25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huxley, J. Sir (1947)Report of the Committee on the Conservation of Nature in England and Wales. Cmnd 7122, HMSO, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • IUCN (and others) (1980)World Conservation Strategy: Living Resource Conservation for Sustainable Development. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • IUCN (1984a)Implementing the World Conservation Strategy: IUCN's Conservation Programme 1985–87. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • IUCN (1984b)Triennial Report, 1982–84. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • IUCN (1984c)WCS in Action. Supplement to IUCN Bulletin Vol. 15, July–Sept. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, B. (1983)The Conservation and Development Programme for the UK. An Overview — Resourceful Britain. Kogan Page: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, A. (1984) The emergence of a Welsh Conservation Strategy. Report by Cynefin Officer.

  • Morison, G. (1984) Nature Conservation in the National Trust for Scotland. Paper prepared for the Meeting of Council, National Trust for Scotland, 27th April 1984.

  • NCC (1984)Nature Conservation in Great Britain. Nature Conservancy Council. HMSO.

  • Potter, J. F. (1985) Profile of Sir Arthur Norman,The Environmentalist, 5 (3) 163–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard, T. and A. Jones (1984)Cynefin — One Year On. Nature Conservancy Council, Bangor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rennie, K. (1984) National Conservation Strategies: an individual's overview. Paper presented to 16th Session of the General Assembly of IUCN, Madrid, November 1984.

  • World Wildlife Fund (WWF) UK and others (1983)The Conservation and Development Programme for the UK. Kogan Page: London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Dr Paul Selman is lecturer in Environmental Management at the University of Stirling. He holds qualifications in environmental science and town planning from East Anglia, Heriot-Watt and Stirling Universities, and has worked as a local authority planner as well as in higher education. He has published extensively on the interface between planning and ecology.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Selman, P.H. Responding to the World Conservation Strategy. Environmentalist 5, 263–268 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02240321

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02240321

Keywords

Navigation