Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Environmental values, conflicts and issues in evaluation

  • Papers
  • Published:
Environmentalist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The existence of conflicts over the use of resources and with respect to the environment is widely acknowledged. The fields of resource management and environmental planning are, in fact, largely dedicated to identifying and resolving such conflicts. In this paper it is proposed that the sources of conflict can be seen in terms of the different values held by groups and individuals in relation to the environment and resource use. The discussion is also concerned with identifying more specifically the nature of conflicts that arise in relation to particular resource-use issues. A further important proposition developed is that in order to promote effective planning, rigorous and systematic methods of analysis are often required. Those best suited to evaluation in environmental and resources planning are capable of incorporating multiple metrics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackoff, R. (1977) Optimisation+Objectivity=Opt Out.European Journal of Operational Research 1(1) 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckerman, W. (1972) Economists, Scientists and Environmental Catastrophe.Oxford Economic Papers 24, 327–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Best, E. (1952)Forest Lore of the Maori. Dominion Museum, Wellington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, J. (1970)The Dominion of Man: The Search for Ecological Responsibility. John Black, Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, D. and Yurman, E. (1980) Disappearing Farmland: A National Concern.Soil Conservation 45, 4–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brill, E. (1979) The Use of Optimisation Models in Public-sector Planning,Management Science 25(5) 413–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullard, C. and Herendeen, R. (1975) The Energy Cost of Goods and Services.Energy Policy 1(4) 268–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centre for Agricultural Strategy (1976)Land for Agriculture, Report 1. University of Reading, Reading.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, S., Brill, E. and Hopkins, L. (1982a) Use of Mathematical Models to Generate Alternative Solutions to Water Resources Planning Problems.Water Resources Research 18(1) 58–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, S., Brill, E. and Hopkins, L. (1982b) Efficient Random Generation of Feasible Solutions: A Land Use Example.Journal of Regional Science 22(3) 303–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, G., Smit, B. and Smith, W. (1984) Flexibility and Criticality in Resource Use Assessment.Geographical Analysis 16(1) 52–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, H. and Auger, J. (1976) Linear Programming and Land Use Allocation: Suboptimal Solutions and Policy.Socio-economic Planning Sciences 10(1) 43–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cocklin, C., Gray, E. and Smit, B. (1983) Future Urban Growth and Agricultural Land in Ontario.Applied Geography 3(2) 91–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cocklin, C., Smit, B. and Johnston, T. (1987) Rural Land-use Analysis and Planning: An Overview. In C. Cocklin, B. Smit and T. Johnston (eds.)Demands on Rural Lands: Planning for Resource Use. Westview Press, Boulder. pp.3–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coelho, J. and Williams, H. (1978) On the Design of Land Use Plans Through Locational Surplus Maximisation.Papers, Regional Science Association 40, 71–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craddock, W. (1970)Interregional Competition in Canadian Cereal Production. Economic Council of Canada, Ottawa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, H. (1968) On Economics as a Life Science.Journal of Political Economy 76, 392–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dane, C., Meador, N. and White, J. (1977) Goal Programming in Land Use Planning.Journal of Forestry 6, 325–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Environment Canada (1981)Downwind — The Acid Rain Story. Environment Canada, Ottawa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erlich, P. and Erlich, A. (1972)Population, Resources, Environment. W.H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankena, M.W. and Scheffman, D.T. (1980)Economic Analysis of Provincial Land Use Policies in Ontario. University of Toronto Press, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furuseth, O. and Pierce, J. (1982)Agricultural Land in an Urban Society. Association of American Geographers, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gates, D. (1985)Energy and Ecology. Sinauer Associates, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilliland, M. (1975) Energy Analysis and Public Policy.Science 189, 1051–1056.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, B. (1986) The Impacts of Structural Change Within an Economy on Resource Use: An Input-Output Analysis.Applied Economics 18, 457–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, E. (1974) Direct Urban Land Needs in the Decades Ahead.Notes on Agriculture 10(2) 20–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannon, B., Blazcek, T., Kennedy, D. and Illyes, R. (1984) A Comparison of Energy Intensities: 1963, 1967 and 1972.Resources and Energy 5(1) 83–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harriss, C. (1980) Free Market Allocation of Land Resources. In Woodruff, C. (ed.)The Farm and the City. Prentice-Hall Inc., New Jersey. pp.123–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heady, E. (1973) Large-scale Models for Analysing and Predicting Potential Land Use Changes and their Economic and Social Impacts. In Whiting, L. (ed.)Land Use Planning Seminar: Focus on Iowa. Centre for Agricultural and Rural Development, Iowa State University. pp. 257–279.

  • Heady, E. and Hall, H. (1968) Linear and Non-linear Spatial Models in Agricultural Competition, Land Use and Production Potential.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 50(5) 1539–1548.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heady, E. and Spaulding, B. (1979) Implications of Alternative Land Use Policies in the North Central Region.Regional Science Perspectives 9(1) 18–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isard, W. (1969) Some Notes on the Linkage of Ecological and Economic Systems.Papers, Regional Science Association 22, 85–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, J. (1982) The Niagara Fruit Belt: The Ontario Municipal Board of Decision of 1981.Canadian Geographer 26(2) 172–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, D. and Finkle, M. (1983)Acid Precipitation in North America: The Case for Transboundary Cooperation. Canadian Institute of Resources Law.

  • Liebman, J. (1976) Some Simple-Minded Observations on the Role of Optimisation in Public Systems Decision-Making.Interfaces 6(4) 102–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leistritz, F. and Chase, R. (1982) Socio-economic Impact Monitoring Systems: A Review and Evaluation.Journal of Environmental Management 15, 333–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lonergan, S. and Cocklin, C. (1985) The Use of Input-Output Analysis in Environmental Management.Journal of Environmental Management 20, 129–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loucks, D., Stedinger, J. and Haith, D. (1981)Water Resource Systems and Planning and Analysis. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAllister, D. (1982)Evaluation in Environmental Planning. MIT Press, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • McPhail, I. (1987) Environment and Planning: The Role of a Government Agency. Paper presented to the workshop Applications of Environmental Research to Environmental Planning, Christchurch, New Zealand, 26 August 1987.

  • Mishan, E. (1976)Cost-Benefit Analysis. Praeger, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdock, S., Leistritz, F. and Jones, L. (1979) Interfacing Economic and Demographic Models for Rural Areas: Design and Methodological Considerations.Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics 7, 139–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nature Conservation Council (1981)Integrating Conservation and Development. Nature Conservation Council, Wellington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nijkamp, P. (1980)Environmental Policy Analysis. John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odum, H. and Odum, E. (1981)Energy Basis for Man and Nature. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Riordan, T., (1976)Environmentalism. Pion, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plaut, T. (1980) Urban Expansion and the Loss of Farmland in the United States: Implications for the Future.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 62(3) 537–542.

    Google Scholar 

  • Postel, S. (1985) Air Pollution, Acid Rain and the Future of Forests. In Southwick, C. (ed.)Global Ecology. Sinauer Associates, Massachusetts. pp.123–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Power, G., Gillespie, W., Wittkowski, D. and Rink, R. (1980) Computer Modelling of Boomtown Housing: The Fort McMurray Study.Canadian Journal of Regional Science 3, 30–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees, J. (1985)Natural Resources: Allocation, Economics and Policy. Methuen, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, S. and Middleton, P. (1983) Public Pressures, Technical Options: The Complex Challenge of Controlling Acid Rain.Environment 25(4) 6–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rifkin, J. (1980)Entropy: A New World View. Bantam, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothschild, B. and Balsinger, J. (1971) A Linear Programming Solution to Salmon Management.Fishery Bulletin 69, 117–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, J. (1981)The Ultimate Resource. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smit, B., Rodd, R., Bond, D., Brklacich, M., Cocklin, C. and Dyer, A. (1983) Implications for Food Production Potential of Future Urban Expansion in Onatrio.Socio-economic Planning Sciences 17(3) 109–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solow, R. (1974) The Economics of Resources and the Resources of Economics.American Economic Review 64, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. (1979) A Neoclassical Analysis of the Economics of Natural Resources. In Smith, V. (ed.)Scarcity and Growth Reconsidered. John Hopkins Press, Baltimore. pp.36–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Victor, P. (1972)Pollution: Economy and Environment. Allen and Unwin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetstone, G. and Foster, S. (1983) Acid Precipitation. What is it Doing to Our Forests.Environment 25(4) 10–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, G. (1967) The Historical Roots of our Ecologic Crisis.Science 155, 1203–1207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G. and Pohl, A. (1987) Let Them Eat Houses: The Implications of Urban Expansion Onto Good Farmland. In Cocklin, C., Smit, B. and Johnston, T. (eds.)Demands on Rural Lands: Planning for Resource Use. Westview Press, Boulder. pp.85–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. (1983) Values, Conflict, and Conflict Resolution.Man, Environment, Space and Time 3(2) 83–128.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

    C. Cocklin

Authors
  1. C. Cocklin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Dr Chris Cocklin is Lecturer in Geography and an Associate of Environmental Science at the University of Auckland, New Zealand. His research interests are in resources and environmental management, energy studies and rural land-use analysis and planning. The main focus of his work to date has been on the development and application of appropriate methods of analysis to assist in the formulation of suitable management strategies.

This paper is based on a presentation made to the New Zealand Geographical Society (Auckland Branch) Annual Lecture Series, 12th August 1987.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cocklin, C. Environmental values, conflicts and issues in evaluation. Environmentalist 8, 93–104 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02240274

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02240274

Keywords

Search

Navigation