Environmentalist

, Volume 3, Issue 3, pp 199–208 | Cite as

Promoting environmental sensitivity within the fishing industry

  • Daniel S. Greenbaum
Article

Summary

The traditional fishing and shellfishing industries of New England depend on the vitality and renewability of the marine environment for their economic health, yet they have historically overfished species to near-depletion, resisted attempts to manage their resources, and discharged their wastes into coastal waters. In 1979, the Massachusetts Audubon Society established Resources for Cape Ann, a local program based in Gloucester, Massachusetts (the highest volume fishing port in New England), designed to encourage environmental sensitivity within the fishing and shellfishing industry. Among the techniques available for environmental education, Resources for Cape Ann chose to pursue cooperative political alliances on issues of common concern (e.g. Outer Continental Shelf oil and gas exploration and pollution of intertidal shellfish flats). Through these alliances, program staff built credibility and mutual understanding with key leaders of the industry, and then sought to translate that understanding into support for improved shellfish resource management and reduced fish processing waste discharges. Though this approach relies heavily on intense personal contact and though it at times requires the submergence of purely environmental concerns so as not to antagonize political allies, it has succeeded in improving shellfishermen awareness and building credibility among the fishing industry in general.

Keywords

Fishing Continental Shelf Fishing Industry Environmental Sensitivity Fish Processing 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Anderson, Lee G. (1977)The Economics of Fisheries Management, Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  2. Ashby, Eric (1978) Igniting the Public Conscience,Reconciling Man with the Environment, Stamford University Press, Palo Alto, California.Google Scholar
  3. Boeri, David and Gibson, James (1976)Tell It Good-Bye Kiddo, International Publishing Company, Camden, Maine, pp. 73–137.Google Scholar
  4. Citizens Advisory Committee on Environmental Quality (1970)Community Action for Environmental Quality, US Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  5. Devanney, John W. (1976)Fisherman and Fish Consumer Income Under the 200-Mile Limit, M.I.T. Sea Grant 75-20, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  6. Gates, John N. and Norton, Virgil J. (1974)The Benefits of Fisheries Regulation: A Case Study of the New England Yellow Tail Flounder Industry, University of Rhode Island Sea Grant, Kingston, Rhode Island.Google Scholar
  7. Gersuny, Carl,et al. (1975)Some Effects of Technological Change on New England Fishermen, University of Rhode Island Sea Grant 75-42, Kingston, Rhode Island.Google Scholar
  8. Gloucester Master Mariner's Association (1915 and subsequent years)Year Book, Gloucester, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  9. Gordon, H. Scott (1954) The Economic Theory of a Community Property Resource: The Fishery,The Journal of Political Economy, University Press, Chicago, April 1954, Sections I, II, III.Google Scholar
  10. International Commission for the Northwest Atlantic Fisheries (1980)Statistical Bulletin, Vol. 28, for 1978, Dartmouth, Canada.Google Scholar
  11. King, Maxwell (1977) Down to the Sea With Money,Forbes Magazine, New York, August 15.Google Scholar
  12. Massachusetts Port Authority (1977)The Fishing Industry in Massachusetts, Boston, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  13. Merriman, Daniel H. (1982) The History of Georges Bank, in Guy C. McLeod (ed.),Georges Bank, Past, Present and Future, Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado, pp. 19–29.Google Scholar
  14. National Marine Fisheries Service (1982 and prior years)Fisheries of the United States, US Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries Service, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  15. Peterson, Susan B. and Smith, Leah J. (1979)New England Fishing, Processing and Distribution, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, WHOI-79-52, Woods Hole, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  16. Pollnac, Richard B.,et al. (1975)Economic Gratification Patterns of Fishermen and Millworkers in New England, University of Rhode Island, Sea Grant 75-43R, Kingston, Rhode Island.Google Scholar
  17. Ross, Linda (1982)The Costs of Pollution: The Shellfish Industry and the Effects of Coastal Water Pollution, Massachusetts Audubon Society, Gloucester, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  18. Smith, Leah H. and Peterson, Susan B. (1977)The New England Fish Processing Industry: A Basis for Management, Wood Hole Oceanographic Institution, WHOI-77-75, Woods Hole, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  19. Vogt, Bill (1978)How to Build a Better Outdoors, David McKay and Company, New York, pp. 66–91.Google Scholar
  20. Warner, William W. (1977) The Politics of Fish,The Atlantic, 240 (2), Boston, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  21. Wert, Jonathan M. and Magnoli, Michael A. (1976)Finding Solutions to Environmental Problems, Environment Center, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Elsevier Sequoia 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel S. Greenbaum
    • 1
  1. 1.Resources for Cape AnnMassachusetts Audubon SocietyGloucesterUSA

Personalised recommendations