Posterior D-transposition of the great arteries with an unusual form of aortic obstruction
An unusual case of posterior transposition of the great arteries, with previously underscribed aortic obstruction is described. The patient, who underwent an arterial switch operation, was found at surgery to have a mass of myxomatous tissue arising from the tricuspid valve. This finding was responsible for the hemodynamically significant aortic stenosis.
Key WordsPosterior transpostion Aortic obstruction Arterial switch procedure Tricuspid valve abnormality
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Angelini P, Leachman RD (1973) Pulmonary artery originating anteriorly from the left ventricle.Am J Cardiol 32:840–845Google Scholar
- 2.Büchler JR, Bembom JC, Büchler RD (1984) Transposition of the great arteries with posterior aorta and subaortic conus: Anatomical and surgical correlation.Int J Cardiol 5:13–18Google Scholar
- 3.Marin-Garcia J, Edwards JE (1980) Atypical d-transposition of the great arteries: Anterior pulmonary trunk.Am J Cardiol 46:507–510Google Scholar
- 4.Moene RJ, Oppenheimer-Dekker A, Bartelings MM (1983) Anatomic obstruction of the right ventricular outflow tract in transposition of the great arteries.Am J Cardiol 51:1701–1704Google Scholar
- 5.Quero Jiménez M, Pérez Martinez V (1974) Uncommon conal pathology in complete dextrotransposition of the great arteries with ventricular septal defect.Chest 66:411–417Google Scholar
- 6.Schneeweiss A, Motro M, Shem-Tov A, Neufeld HN (1981) Subaortic stenosis: An unrecognized problem in transposition of the great arteries.Am J Cardiol 48:336–339Google Scholar
- 7.Van Praagh R, Pérez-Trevino, C, López-Cuellar M, Baker FW, Zuberbuhler JR, Quero M, Pérez VM, Moreno F, Van Praagh S (1971) Transposition of the great arteries with posterior aorta, anterior pulmonary artery, subpulmonary conus and fibrous continuity between aortic and atrioventricular valves.Am J Cardiol 28:621–631Google Scholar
- 8.Wilkinson JL, Arnold R, Anderson RH, Acerete F (1975) “Posterior” transposition reconsidered.Br Heart J 37:757–766Google Scholar