Advertisement

Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

, Volume 36, Issue 7, pp 645–653 | Cite as

Relationship of apical lymph node involvement to survival in resected colon carcinoma

  • BenoÎt Malassagne
  • Patrice Valleur
  • Javier Serra
  • Sabine Sarnacki
  • Annie Galian
  • Catherine Hoang
  • Pierre Hautefeuille
Original Contributions

Abstract

In a prospective study of 197 patients with resected colon carcinoma treated between 1974 and 1985, we explored the relationships between pathologic parameters, and the effect of the latter on survival, to identify the parameter whose systematic measurement would improve the predictive capacity of pathologic staging. Prognostic characteristics were studied by univariate analysis. The results showed significant relationships between the location and number of lymph nodes involved, blood vessel invasion, depth of tumor penetration, and metastases. The five-year survival rates were 45 percent and 17 percent (P <0.001) for patients without and with apical lymph node involvement, respectively, and 44 percent and 6 percent (P <0.05) for those with four or less nodes involved and more than four involved, respectively. Among the patients treated by incomplete resection, the respective survival rates of those resected for metastases and of those resected for apical lymph node involvement did not differ significantly. We conclude that the involvement of apical lymph nodes has a significant effect on prognosis and suggest systematic pathologic examination of these nodes to allow simpler and more reproducible selection of patients for treatment by incomplete resection who are at high risk of disease-related death.

Key words

Colon carcinoma Apical lymph node involvement Survival Prognostic factors 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Fielding LP, Phillips RK, Frey JS, Hittinger R. Prediction of outcome after curative resection for large bowel cancer. Lancet 1986;2:904–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dukes CE, Bussey HJ. The spread of rectal cancer and its effect on prognosis. Br J Cancer 1958;12:309–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Grinnel TS. The spread of carcinoma of the colon and rectum. Cancer 1950;3:641–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Copeland EM, Miller LD, Jones RS. Prognosis in carcinoma of the colon and rectum. Am J Surg 1968;116:875–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Spratt JS, Sputj HJ. Prevalence and prognosis of individual clinical and pathologic variables associated with colorectal carcinoma. Cancer 1967;20:1976–85.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Herrera-Ornelas S, Justiano S, Castillo N, Petrelli NJ, Stule JP, Mittelman A. Metastases in small lymph nodes from colon cancer. Arch Surg 1987;122:1253–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Grinnel R. Lymphatic metastases of carcinoma of the colon and rectum. Ann Surg 1950;131:494–505.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wolmark N, Fisher ER, Wieand HS, Fisher B, contributing NSABP investigators. The relationship of depth of penetration and tumor size to the number of positive nodes in Dukes' C colorectal cancer. Cancer 1984;53:2707–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fielding LP. Clinical-pathologic staging of large-bowel cancer: a report of the ASCRS Committee. Dis Colon Rectum 1988;31:204–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Newland RC, Chapuis PH, Pheils MT, MacPherson JG. The relationship of survival to staging and grading of colorectal carcinoma: a prospective study of 503 cases. Cancer 1981;47:1424–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jass JR, Sobin LH. Histological typing of intestinal tumours. World Health Organization. International Histological Classification of Tumours. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1989.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Buckwalter JA Jr, Kent TH. Prognosis and surgical pathology of carcinoma of the colon. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1973;136:465–72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Phillips RK, Hittinger R, Blevosky L, Fry JS, Fielding LP. Large bowel cancer: surgical pathology and its relationship to survival. Br J Surg 1984;71:604–10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Astler VB, Coller FA. The prognostic significance of direct extension of carcinoma of the colon and the rectum. Ann Surg 1954;139:846–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Carrol SE. The prognostic significance of gross venous invasion in carcinoma of the rectum. Can J Surg 1963;6:281–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Knudsen JB, Nilsson T, Sprechler M, Johansen AA, Christensen N. Venous and nerve invasion as prognostic factors in postoperative survival of patients with resectable cancer of the rectum. Dis Colon Rectum 1983;26:613–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Minsky BD, Mies C, Rich TA, Recht A, Chaffey T. Potentially curative surgery of colon cancer: the influence of blood vessel invasion. J Clin Oncol 1988;6:119–27.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dukes CE. The classification of cancer of the rectum. J Pathol Bacteriol 1932;35:323–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wiggers T, Arends JW, Schutte B, Volovics L, Bosman FT. A multivariate analysis of pathologic prognostic indicators in large bowel cancer. Cancer 1988;61:386–95.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Schein PS. Adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy following rectal surgery: an interim report from the Gastrointestinal Study Group (GITS). In: Jones SE, Salmon SE, eds. Adjuvant therapy of cancer III. New York: Grune & Stratton, 1981:547–58.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Koprowski H, Steplewski Z, Michell K. Colorectal carcinoma antigens detected by hybridoma antibodies. Somatic Cell Mol Genet 1979;5:957–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jass JR, Love SB, Northever JM. A new prognostic classification of rectal cancer. Lancet 1987;11:1303–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Payne JE. International colorectal carcinoma staging and grading. Dis Colon Rectum 1988;31:204–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Cohen AM, Tremiterra S, Candela F, Thaler HT, Sigurson ER. Prognosis of node-positive colon cancer. Cancer 1991;67:1859–61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Chapuis PH, Dent OF, Fisher R,et al. A multivariate analysis of clinical and pathological variables in prognosis after resection of large bowel cancer. Br J Surg 1985;72:698–702.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gabriel WB, Dukes C, Bussey HJ. Lymphatic spread in cancer of the rectum. Br J Surg 1935;23:395–413.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Newland RC, Chapuis PH, Smyth EJ. The prognostic value of substaging colorectal carcinoma: a prospective study of 1117 cases with standardized pathology. Cancer 1987;60:852–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sugarbaker PH, Corlew S. Influence of surgical techniques on survival in patients with colorectal cancer: a review. Dis Colon Rectum 1982;25:545–57.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Blenkissopp WK, Stewart-Brown S, Blesovsky L, Kearney G, Fielding LP. Histopathology reporting in large bowel cancer. J Clin Pathol 1981;34:509–13.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wolmark N, Fisher B, Wieand HS. The prognostic value of the modifications of the Dukes' C class of colorectal cancer: an analysis of the NSABP Clinical Trials. Ann Surg 1986;203:115–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Grinnel RS. Lymphatic block with atypical and retrograde lymphatic metastasis and spread in carcinoma of the colon and rectum. Ann Surg 1966;163:272–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hojo K, Koyama Y, Moriya Y. Lymphatic spread and its prognostic value in patients with rectal cancer. Am J Surg 1982;144:350–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Finlay IG, McArdle CS. Occult hepatic metastases in colorectal carcinoma. Br J Surg 1985;72:698–702.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • BenoÎt Malassagne
    • 1
  • Patrice Valleur
    • 1
  • Javier Serra
    • 1
  • Sabine Sarnacki
    • 1
  • Annie Galian
    • 2
  • Catherine Hoang
    • 2
  • Pierre Hautefeuille
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of General SurgeryLariboisiere HospitalParisFrance
  2. 2.Department of PathologyLariboisiere HospitalParisFrance

Personalised recommendations