Advertisement

Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

, Volume 42, Issue 9, pp 1189–1194 | Cite as

Laparoscopic surgery for rectal prolapse and outlet obstruction

  • Hans-Peter Bruch
  • Alexander Herold
  • Thomas Schiedeck
  • Oliver Schwandner
Original Contributions

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the outcome of both laparoscopic suture rectopexy and resection-rectopexy in the treatment of complete and incomplete rectal prolapse, outlet obstruction, or both. METHODS: Data from surgery were collected prospectively. Semiannual follow-up was performed by assessment of recurrence, continence, and constipation using patients' history, physical examination, continence score, and anorectal manometry. Statistical analysis was performed by chi-squared test and Student'st-test (P<0.05 was accepted as statistically significant). RESULTS: Between September 1992 and February 1997, 72 patients (68 females) with a mean age of 62 (range, 23–88) years were treated laparoscopically. Indications for surgery were rectal prolapse in 21 patients, rectal prolapse combined with outlet obstruction in 36 patients, and outlet obstruction alone in 15 patients. Standard procedure was a laparoscopic suture rectopexy. A sigmoid resection was added in 40 patients. Mean duration of surgery was 227 (range, 125–360) minutes for rectopexy and 258 (range, 150–380) minutes for resection-rectopexy. Conversion was necessary in 1.4 percent (n=1). Overall complication rate was 9.7 percent (n=7) and mortality rate was 0 percent. Mean postoperative hospitalization was 15 (range, 6–47) days. All patients with a minimal follow-up of two years (n=53) could be enrolled in a prospective follow-up study (mean follow-up, 30 months). No recurrence of rectal prolapse had to be recognized. Sixty-four percent of patients with incontinence before surgery were continent or had improved continence. In patients experiencing constipation preoperatively, constipation was improved or completely removed in 76 percent. No additional symptoms of constipation occurred after surgery. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic procedures in the treatment of pelvic floor disorders,e.g., rectal prolapse or outlet obstruction, lead to acceptable functional results. However, follow-up has to be extended and long-term results of recurrence, continence, and constipation have to be evaluated.

Key words

Laparoscopic colorectal surgery Rectopexy Sigmoid resection Rectal prolapse Outlet obstruction Intussusception Functional results 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Berman IR. Sutureless laparoscopic rectopexy for procidentia: technique and implications. Dis Colon Rectum 1992;35:689–93.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baker R, Senagore AJ, Luchtefeld MA. Laparoscopic-assistedvs. open resection: rectopexy offers excellent results. Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:199–201.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ballantyne GH. Laparoscopically assisted anterior resection for rectal prolapse. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1992;2:230–6.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cuesta MA, Borgstein PJ, de Jong D, Meijer S. Laparoscopic rectopexy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1993;3:456–8.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cuschieri A, Shimi SM, van der Velpen G, Banting S, Wood RA. Laparoscopic prosthesis fixation rectopexy for complete rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 1994;81:138–9.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Darzi A, Henry MM, Guillou PJ, Shorvon P, Monson JR. Stapled laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse. Surg Endosc 1995;9:301–3.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Graf W, Stefansson T, Arvidsson D, Påhlman L. Laparoscopic suture rectopexy. Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:211–2.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Koeckerling F, Schneider C, Hohenberger W. Rectumprolaps—Verfahrenswahl und minimal-invasive Möglichkeiten. Chirurg 1996;67:471–82.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kwok SP, Carey DP, Lau WY, Li AK. Laparoscopic rectopexy. Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:947–8.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Munro W, Avramovic J, Roney W. Laparoscopic rectopexy. J Laparoendosc Surg 1993;3:55–8.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Poen AC, de Brauw M, Felt-Bersma RJ, de Jong D, Cuesta MA. Laparoscopic rectopexy for complete rectal prolapse. Clinical outcome and anorectal function tests. Surg Endosc 1996;10:904–8.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Senagore AJ, Luchtefeld MA, MacKeigan JM. Rectopexy. J Laparoendosc Surg 1993;3:339–43.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Solomon MJ, Eyers AA. Laparoscopic rectopexy using mesh fixation with a spiked chromium staple. Dis Colon Rectum 1996;39:279–84.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Stevenson AR, Stitz RW, Lumley JW. Laparoscopic-assisted resection-rectopexy for rectal prolapse: early and medium follow-up. Dis Colon Rectum 1998;41:46–54.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sudeck P. Rektumprolapsoperation durch Auslösung des Rektum aus der Excavatio sacralis. Zentralbl Chir 1992;20:698–9.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wells C. New operation for rectal prolapse. J R Soc Med 1959;52:602–3.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ripstein CB. Treatment of massive rectal prolapse. Am J Surg 1952;83:68–71.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Frykman HM, Goldberg SM. The surgical treatment of procidentia. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1969;129:1225–30.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Graf W, Ejerblad S, Krog M, Påhlman L, Gerdin B. Delorme's operation for rectal prolapse in elderly or unfit patients. Eur J Surg 1992;158:555–7.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Williams JG, Rothenberger DA, Madoff RD, Goldberg SM. Treatment of rectal prolapse in the elderly by perineal rectosigmoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 1992;35:830–4.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Eu K-W, Seow-Choen F. Functional problems in adult rectal prolapse and controversies in surgical treatment. Br J Surg 1997;84:904–11.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hiltunen KM, Matikainen M. Improvement of continence after abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse. Int J Colorectal Dis 1992;7:8–10.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Husa A, Sainio P, von Smitten K. Abdominal rectopexy and sigmoid resection (Frykman-Goldberg operation) for rectal prolapse. Acta Chir Scand 1988;154:221–4.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Keighley MR, Fielding JW, Alexander-Williams J. Results of Marlex mesh abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse in 100 consecutive patients. Br J Surg 1983;70:229–32.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Luukkonen P, Mikkonen U, Jarvinen H. Abdominal rectopexy with sigmoidectomyvs. rectopexy alone for rectal prolapse: a prospective, randomized study. Int J Colorectal Dis 1992;7:219–22.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Madoff RD, Williams JG, Wong WD, Rothenberger DA, Goldberg SM. Long-term functional results of colon resection and rectopexy for overt rectal prolapse. Am J Gastroenterol 1992;87:101–4.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Duthie GS, Bartolo DC. Abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a comparison of techniques. Br J Surg 1992;79:107–13.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Huber FT, Stein H, Siewert JR. Functional results after treatment of rectal prolapse with rectopexy and sigmoid resection. World J Surg 1995;19:138–43.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    McKee RF, Lauder JC, Poon FW, Aitchinson MA, Finlay IG. A prospective randomized study of abdominal rectopexy with and without sigmoidectomy in rectal prolapse. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1992;174:145–8.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Novell JR, Osborne MJ, Winslet MC, Lewis AA. Prospective randomised trial of Ivalon sponge versus sutured rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 1994;81:904–6.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Speakman CT, Madden MV, Nicholls RJ, Kamm MA. Lateral ligament division during rectopexy causes constipation but prevents recurrence: results of a prospective randomized study. Br J Surg 1991;78:1431–3.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Scaglia M, Fasth S, Hallgren T, Nordgren S, Oresland T, Hulten L. Abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse: influence of surgical technique on functional outcome. Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:805–13.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Briel JW, Schouten WR, Boerma MO. Long-term results of suture rectopexy in patients with fecal incontinence associated with incomplete rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 1997;40:1228–32.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Graf W, Karlbom U, Påhlman L, Nilsson S, Ejerblad S. Functional results after abdominal suture rectopexy for rectal prolapse or intussusception. Eur J Surg 1996;162:905–11.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Jacobs LK, Lin YJ, Orkin BA. The best operation for rectal prolapse. Surg Clin North Am 1997;77:49–70.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Mellgren A, Schultz I, Johansson C, Dolk A. Internal rectal intussusception seldom develops into total rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 1997;40:817–20.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hans-Peter Bruch
    • 1
  • Alexander Herold
    • 1
  • Thomas Schiedeck
    • 1
  • Oliver Schwandner
    • 1
  1. 1.the Department of SurgeryMedical University of LuebeckLuebeckGermany

Personalised recommendations