Skip to main content
Log in

Idiosyncratic definitions and unsupported hypotheses: Rational emotive behavior therapy as pseudoscience

  • Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy: Critiques from Within
  • Published:
Journal of Rational-Emotive and Cognitive-Behavior Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

My concerns about Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy (REBT) began over a decade ago. I find its concepts lack adequate and consistent definitions, its distinctive hypotheses are not confirmed by empirical data and are untestable, and its scientific foundations fall outside mainstream psychology. Contrary to what it claims, its practice and philosophy are not consisten with the use of reason in psychotherapy. These criticisms are discussed and documented. Practitioners may not be aware of the unsubstantiated claims and theoretical assumptions inherent in REBT, and that they adopt these assumptions when practicing REBT.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baxley, N. (1981) (Producer).Rational-emotive therapy. (Film) Champaign, IL: Research Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T. (1963). Thinking and depression.Archives of General Psychiatry, 15 305–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T. (1976).Cognitive therapy and the emotional disorders. New York: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, I. M. & Rosenfeld, J. G. (1976). Rational emotive therapy—a study of initial therapy sessions of Albert Ellis.Journal of Clinical Psychology, 32, 872–876.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramer, D. (1985). Irrational beliefs and strength versus inappropriateness of feelings.British Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 3(2), 81–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramer, D., & Fong, J. (1991). Effects of rational and irrational beliefs on intensity and “inappropriateness” of feelings: A test of rational-emotive theory.Cognitive Therapy and Research, 15, 319–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A. (1962).Reason and emotion in psychotherapy. New York: Lyle Stuart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A. (1994).Reason and emotion in psychotherapy (Revised edition). New York: Birch Lane Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A. (1971).Growth through reason: Verbatim cases in rational-emotive therapy. North Hollywood, CA: Wilshire Book. Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A. (1975). Creative joy and happiness: The humanistic way.The Humanist, 35(1), 11–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A. (1977). The basic clinical theory of rational-emotive therapy. In A. Ellis & R. M. Grieger (Eds.),Handbook of rational-emotive therapy (Vol. I). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A. (1981). Is RET ethically untenable or inconsistent? A reply to Paul E. Meehl.Rational Living, 16(1), 38–41, 42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A. (1982). The treatment of alcohol and drug abuse: A rational-emotive approach.Rational Living, 17(2), 15–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A. (1985). Differentiating appropriate from inappropriate feelings in RET.British Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 3(2), 90–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A. (1986). An emotional control card for inappropriate and appropriate emotions in using rational-emotive imagery.Journal of Counseling and Development, 65, 205–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A. (1989). Is rational-emotive therapy (RET) “rationalistic” or “constructivistic”? Keynote address, World Congress of Cognitive Therapy, Oxford, England, June 30.

  • Ellis, A. (1993). A critique of Wessler's critique of rational-emotive therapy.Psychotherapy, 30, 531–532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A. (1994). (Speaker). A rational emotive behavior therapy approach to personality disorders. American Counseling Association Annual Convention, Minneapolis, MN, April 25.

  • Ellis, A. & Dryden W. (1987).The practice of rational-emotive therapy RET. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, M. (1952).In the name of science. New York: Putnam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hines, T. (1988).Pseudoscience and the paranormal. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kassinove, H., Eckhardt, C., & Endes, R. (1993). Assessing the intensity of “appropriate” and “inappropriate” emotions in rational-emotional therapy.Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy: International Quarterly, 7, 227–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. S. (1984). On the primacy of cognition.American Psychologist, 39, 124–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeDoux, J.L. (1995). Emotion: Clues from the brain.Annual Review of Psychology, 46, 209–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plutchik, R. (1980).Emotion: A psychoevolutionary synthesis. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, H. (1993). Developing themes in the field of cognitive therapy.In K. T. Kuehlwein and H. Rosen (Eds.),Cognitive therapy in action: Evolving innovative practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruegg, R. & Frances, A. (1995). New research in personality disorders.Journal of Personality Disorders, 9(1), 1–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinberger, M., Newell, J. D. and Garcia, L. T. (1984).Ethical issues in psychology. Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wessler, R. L. (1984a). Alternative conceptions of rational-emotive therapy: Toward a philosophically neutral psychotherapy.In M. Reda & M. J. Mahoney (Eds.),Cognitive psychotherapies: Recent developments in theory, research, and practice. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wessler, R. L. (1984b). A bridge too far: Incompatibilities of rational-emotive therapy and pastoral counseling.The Personnel and Guidance Journal, 63, 264–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wessler, R. L. (1987). Listening to Oneself: Cognitive Appraisal Therapy.In W. Dryden (Ed.),Key cases in psychotherapy. London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wessler, R. L. (1992a). Constructivism and rational-emotive therapy: A critique.Psychotherapy, 29, 620–625.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wessler, R. L. (1992b). A reply to Ellis's critique of Wessler's critique of rational-emotive therapy.Psychotherapy, 30, 533–534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wessler, R. L. (1993). Cognitive appraisal therapy and disorders of personality.In K. T. Kuehlwein and H. Rosen (Eds.),Cognitive therapy in action: Evolving innovative practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wessler, R. L., and Hankin, S. (1988). Rational-emotive therapy and related cognitively oriented psychotherapies.In S. Long (Ed.),Six group therapies. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wessler, R. A. and Wessler, R. L. (1980).Principles and practice of rational-emotive therapy. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wessler, R.L. Idiosyncratic definitions and unsupported hypotheses: Rational emotive behavior therapy as pseudoscience. J Rational-Emot Cognitive-Behav Ther 14, 41–61 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02238093

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02238093

Keywords

Navigation