Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Fort Bragg study: What can we conclude?

  • Published:
Journal of Child and Family Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bickman, L., Heflinger, C. A., Lambert, E. W., & Summerfelt, W. T. (1996). The Fort Bragg managed care experiment: Short term impact on psychopathology.Journal of Child and Family Studies, 5.

  • Cullinan, D., Epstein, M. H., & Sarbornie, E. J. (1992). Selected characteristics of national sample of seriously emotionally disturbed adolescents.Behavior Disorders, 17, 273–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duchnowski, A. J., Johnson, M. K., Hall, K. S., Kutash, K., & Friedman, R. M. (1993). The alternatives to residential treatment study: Initial findings.Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 1, 17–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, R. M., & Burns, B. J. (1996). The evaluation of the Fort Bragg demonstration project: An alternative interpretation of the findings.The Journal of Mental Health Administration, 23, 128–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenbaum, P. E., Prange, M. E., Friedman, R. M., & Silver, S. E. (1991). Substance abuse prevalence and comorbidity with other psychiatric disorders among adolescents with severe emotional disturbances.Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 30, 575–583.

    Google Scholar 

  • McConaughy, S., & Skiba, R. (1993). Comorbidity of externalizing and internalizing problems.School Psychology Review, 22, 421–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orwin, R. G., Cordray, D. C., & Huebner, R. B. (1994). Judicious application of randomized designs. In K.J. Conrad (Ed.),Critically evaluating the role of experiments (pp. 73–86). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silver, S. E., Duchnowski, A. J., Kutash, K., Friedman, R. M., Eisen, M., Prange, M. E., Brandenburg, N. A., & Greenbaum, P. E. (1992). A comparison of children with serious emotional disturbance served in residential and school settings.Journal of Child and Family Studies, 1, 43–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stroul, B. A., & Friedman, R. M. (1986).A system of care for severely emotionally disturbed children and youth. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Child Development Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanderbilt Institute for Public Policy Studies (1993a).Final report of the quality study of the Fort Bragg evaluation project. Nashville, Tenn.: Vanderbilt Institute for Public Policy Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanderbilt Institute for Public Policy Studies (1993b).Final report of the implementation study of the Fort Bragg evaluation project. (Vol. I). Nashville, Tenn.: Vanderbilt Institute for Public Policy Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanderbilt Institute for Public Policy Studies (1994).Final report of the outcome and cost/utilization studies of the Fort Bragg evaluation project (Vol. I). Nashville, Tenn.: Vanderbilt Institute for Public Policy Studies.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Child and Family Studies, Florida Mental Health Institute, University of South Florida, 13301 Bruce B. Downs Boulevard, 33612-3899, Tampa, Florida

    Robert M. Friedman Ph.D. (Professor and Chair)

Authors
  1. Robert M. Friedman Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Friedman, R.M. The Fort Bragg study: What can we conclude?. J Child Fam Stud 5, 161–168 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02237937

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02237937

Keywords

Search

Navigation