Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Variations in motor evoked potential latencies in the anal sphincter system with sacral magnetic stimulation

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

PURPOSE: The anal sphincter system of the skeletal musculature consists of various parts but functions as a single unit. The motor latencies measured at the puborectalis, deep external anal sphincter, superficial external anal sphincter, and subcutaneous external anal sphincter have yet to be clearly elucidated. This study was designed to measure the motor latencies of these sphincters separately and to investigate the electrophysiologic heterogeneity of the anal sphincter system. METHODS: In 20 preoperative patients with colon cancer without either neurologic or anorectal diseases, motor evoked potentials were taken separately bilaterally at levels measuring approximately 5, 3.8, 2.6, and 1.5 cm from the perineal skin using a concentric needle electrode after magnetic stimulation on the sacral region. These latencies were considered to be separately measured at the puborectalis, deep, superficial, and subcutaneous external anal sphincter. RESULTS: The motor latencies (median (95 percent confidence interval)) were 4.33 (4.1–4.93; right) and 4.24 (3.97–5.22; left) ms at the 5 cm level; 5.96 (5.45–7.32; right) and 6.44 (5.49–8.20; left) ms at the 3.8 cm level; 9.28 (7.99–11.21; right) and 8.88 (7.68–10.93; left) ms at the 2.6 cm level; and 11.06 (9.69–14.13; right) and 9.18 (8.09–10.31; left) ms at the 1.5 cm level. Significant differences were seen in the latencies between the 5 cm level and the other levels and between the 3.8 cm level and the other levels. CONCLUSIONS: The motor latencies in the anal sphincter system significantly varied depending on the distance from the skin. The latency may be shortest in the puborectalis and increasingly longer in the deep, superficial, and subcutaneous EAS, in that order.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kiff ES, Swash M. Slow conduction in the pudendal nerves in idiopathic (neurogenic) faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 1984;71:614–6.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Polson MJ, Barker AT, Freeston IL. Stimulation of nerve trunks with time-varying magnetoelectric fields. Med Biol Eng Comput 1982;20:243–4.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Opsomer RJ, Aramia MD, Zarola F, Rossini PM. Neurophysiological evaluation of the central-peripheral sensory and motor pudendal fibres. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1989;74:260–70.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ertekin C, Hansen MV, Larsson LE, Sjödahl R. Examination of the descending pathway to the external anal sphincter and pelvic floor muscles by transcranial cortical stimulation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1990;75:500–10.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pelliccioni G, Scarpino O, Piloni V. Motor evoked potentials recorded from external anal sphincter by cortical and lumbo-sacral magnetic stimulation: normative data. J Neurol Sci 1997;149:69–72.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Loening-Baucke V, Reas NW, Yamada T, Barker AT. Evaluation of the motor and sensory components of the pudendal nerve. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1994;93:35–41.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jost WH, Schimrigk K. A new method to determine pudendal nerve motor latency and central motor conduction time to the external anal sphincter. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1994;93:237–9.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Warwock R. Williams PL., eds. Gray's anatomy. 35th ed. Edinburgh: Longman Group, 1973:1292–5.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Guyton AC. Textbook of medical physiology. 8th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Snooks SJ, Henry MM, Swash M. Anorectal incontinence and rectal prolapse: differential assessment of the innervation to puborectalis and external anal sphincter muscles. Gut 1985;26:470–6.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dalley AF. The riddle of the sphincters. The morphophysiology of the anorectal mechanism reviewed [published erratum appears in Am Surg 1987;53:398]. Am Surg 1987;53:298–306.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ihre T. Studies on anal function in continent and incontinent patients. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl 1974;25:1–64.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Percy JP, Neill ME, Swash M, Parks AG. Electrophysiological study of motor nerve supply of pelvic floor. Lancet 1981;1:16–7.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Supported in part by the 1998 Young Investigator Award of Jichi Medical School and by the Scientific Research Fund from the Japanese Ministry of Education, both to Dr. Sato.

About this article

Cite this article

Sato, T., Konishi, F. & Kanazawa, K. Variations in motor evoked potential latencies in the anal sphincter system with sacral magnetic stimulation. Dis Colon Rectum 43, 966–970 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02237361

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02237361

Key words

Navigation