Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

EMG of the external anal sphincter: Needle is superior to surface electrode

  • Letters To The Editor
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Lopez A, Nilsson BY, Mellgren A, Zetterström J, Holmström B. Electromyography of the external anal sphincter: comparison between needle and surface electrodes. Dis Colon Rectum 1999;42:482–5.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ho Y-H, Tan M, Goh H-S. Clinical and physiologic effects of biofeedback in outlet obstruction constipation. Dis Colon Rectum 1996;39:520–4.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jost WH, Schrank B, Herold A, Leiβ O. Functional outlet obstruction: anismus, spastic pelvic floor syndrome, and dyscoordination of the voluntary sphincter muscles. Scand J Gastroenterol 1999;5:449–53.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jost WH, Müller-Lobeck H, Merkle W. Involuntary contractions of the striated anal sphincters as a cause of constipation: report of a case. Dis Colon Rectum 1998;41:258–60.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kiff ES, Swash M. Normal proximal and delayed distal conduction in the pudendal nerves of patients with idiopathic (neurogenic) faecal incontinence. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1984;47:820–3.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jost WH, Schimrigk K. Magnetic stimulation of the pudendal nerve. Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:697–9.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Wiesner, A., Jost, W.H. EMG of the external anal sphincter: Needle is superior to surface electrode. Dis Colon Rectum 43, 116–117 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02237259

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02237259

Keywords

Navigation