Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Invited editorial

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Rantis PC Jr, Vernava AM III, Daniel GL, Longo WE. Chronic constipation—is the work-up worth the cost? Dis Colon Rectum 1997;40:280–6.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Karulf RE, Coller JA, Bartolo DC,et al. Anorectal physiology testing: a survey of availability and use. Dis Colon Rectum 1991;34:464–8.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wexner SD, Jorge JM. Colorectal physiology tests: use or abuse of technology? Eur J Surg 1994;160:167–74.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rao SS, Patel RS. How useful are manometric tests of anorectal function in the management of defecation disorders? Am J Gastroenterol 1997;92:469–75.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Vernava AM III, Longo WE, Daniel GL. Pudendal neuropathy and the importance of EMG evaluation of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 1993;36:23–7.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Nelson R, Norton N, Cautley E, Furner S. Community-based prevalence of anal incontinence. JAMA 1995;274:559–61.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Nelson R, Furner S, Jesudason V. Fecal incontinence in Wisconsin nursing homes: prevalence and associations. Dis Colon Rectum 1998;41:1226–9.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jorge JM, Wexner SD. Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 1993;36:77–97.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson CN, Thomas JM, Bartram CI. Anal sphincter disruption during vaginal delivery. N Engl J Med 1993;329:1956–7.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rieger NA, Sweeney JL, Hoffmann DC, Young JF, Hunter A. Investigation of fecal incontinence with endoanal ultrasound. Dis Colon Rectum 1996;39:860–4.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kuijpers HC, ed. Colorectal physiology: fecal incontinence. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wexner SD, Marchetti F, Jagelman DG. The role of sphincteroplasty for fecal incontinence reevaluated: a prospective physiologic and functional review. Dis Colon Rectum 1991;34:22–30.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Oliveira L, Pfeifer J, Wexner SD. Physiological and clinical outcome of anterior sphincteroplasty. Br J Surg 1996;83:502–5.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gilliland R, Altomare DF, Moreira H Jr, Oliveira L, Gilliland J, Wexner SD. Pudendal neuropathy is predictive of failure following anterior overlapping sphincteroplasty. Dis Colon Rectum 1998;41:1516–22.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Keighley MR, Williams NS, eds. Surgery of the anus, rectum and colon. Vol. 2. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wexner SD, Gonzalez-Padron A, Rius J,et al. Stimulated gracilis neosphincter operation. Initial experience, pitfalls, and complications. Dis Colon Rectum 1996;39:957–64

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wong WD, Jensen LL, Bartolo DC, Rothenberger DA. Artificial and sphincter. Dis Colon Rectum 1996;39:1345–51.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Jensen LL, Lowry AC. Biofeedback improves functional outcome after sphincteroplasty. Dis Colon Rectum 1997;40:197–200.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Oliveira L, Wexner SD. Anal incontinence. In: Beck DE, Wexner SD, eds. Fundamentals of anorectal surgery. London: WB Saunders, 1998:115–52.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Wexner, S.D., Lowry, A.C., Mellgren, A. et al. Invited editorial. Dis Colon Rectum 42, 865–867 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02237090

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02237090

Keywords

Navigation