Skip to main content
Log in

Shocks in a coastal boundary current

  • Published:
Journal of Oceanography Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We studied shocks in a coastal boundary current with zero potential vorticity. By coastal boundary current, we mean a semigeostrophic light fluid flow over an infinitely deep dense fluid and along a coast on its right hand side, with its lower interface exposed to the ocean surface at some finite distance from the coast. The shocks are assumed to conserve mass and momentum. It is found that the shocks can be classified into two categories, “coastal shocks” and “frontal shocks”, by the signs of the upper layer flux relative to the shocks. Coastal shocks, for which the relative upper layer flux is negative, always propagate downstream. The upper layer at the coast is thicker on the upstream sides of coastal shocks than on the downstream sides. Frontal shocks, for which the relative upper layer flux is positive, propagate upstream as well as downstream. In most cases, the current is wider on the downstream sides of frontal shocks than on the upstream sides. However, under the circumstances that the current is nearly separated from the coast, the current is wider on the upstream sides of frontal shocks. Coastal and frontal shocks both dissipate energy of the current. We also demonstrate that special shocks with no light fluid on the downstream sides cannot exist irrespective of the potential vorticity distribution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Benjamin, T. B. (1968): Gravity currents and related phenomena.J. Fluid Mech.,31, 209–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, R. W. and E. J. Hopfinger (1983): Gravity currents moving along a lateral boundary in a rotating fluid.J. Fluid Mech.,134, 357–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubokawa, A. and K. Hanawa (1984a): A theory of semigeostrophic gravity waves and its application to the intrusion of a density current along a coast. Part 1. Semigeostrophic gravity waves.J. Oceanogr. Soc. Japan,40, 247–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubokawa, A. and K. Hanawa (1984b): A theory of semigeostrophic gravity waves and its application to the intrusion of a density current along a coast. Part 2. Intrusion of a density current along a coast in a rotating fluid.J. Oceanogr. Soc. Japan,40, 260–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landau, L. D. and E. M. Lifshitz (1987):Fluid Mechanics. Pergamon, 532 pp.

  • Long, R. R. (1954): Some aspects of the flow of stratified fluids. II. Experiments with a two-fluid system.Tellus,6, 97–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nof, D. (1984): Shock waves in currents and outflows.J. Phys. Oceanogr.,14, 1683–1702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nof, D. (1987): Penetrating outflows and the dam-breaking problem.J. Mar. Res.,45, 557–577

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, L. J. (1983): On inertial flow over topography. Part 1. Semigeostrophic adjustment to an obstacle.J. Fluid Mech.,131, 195–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, L. J. (1987): Rotating shocks in a separated laboratory channel flow.J. Phys. Oceanogr.,17, 483–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Røed, L. P. (1980): Curvature effects on hydraulically driven inertial boundary currents.J. Fluid Mechn.,96, 395–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, M. E. (1980): Geostrophic fronts, bores, breaking and blocking waves.J. Fluid Mech.,99, 687–703.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, M. E., J. A. Whitehead and B. L. Hua (1982) The intrusion of a density current along the coast of a rotating fluid.J. Fluid Mech.,123, 237–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitham, G. B. (1974):Linear and Nonlinear Waves. Wiley & Sons, 636 pp.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maruyama, K. Shocks in a coastal boundary current. J Oceanogr 52, 139–169 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02235667

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02235667

Keywords

Navigation