Advertisement

Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

, Volume 43, Issue 5, pp 638–643 | Cite as

Laparoscopic suture rectopexy without resection is effective treatment for full-thickness rectal prolapse

  • S. M. Heah
  • J. E. Hartley
  • J. Hurley
  • G. S. Duthie
  • J. R. T. Monson
Original Contributions

Abstract

PURPOSE: The study was undertaken to evaluate the role of laparoscopic suture rectopexy without resection as a safe and effective treatment for full-thickness rectal prolapse. METHOD: Data were prospectively collected and analyzed on 25 patients who underwent laparoscopic rectopexy without resection for full-thickness rectal prolapse between October 1994 and July 1998. Four patients had conversions from laparoscopic to open surgery. Two patients had recurrent prolapse previously managed by Delorme's procedure. Another two patients had solitary rectal ulcer syndrome associated with their full-thickness rectal prolapse. There were a total of three males. Mean age was 72 (range, 37–89) years. The preoperative and postoperative course of each patient was followed up, with attention paid to first bowel movement, hospital stay, duration of surgery, fecal incontinence, constipation, recurrent prolapse, morbidity, and mortality. Follow-up was made by clinic appointments and, if necessary, by telephone review. RESULTS: Median follow-up period was 26 (range, 1–41) months. Mean duration of surgery was 96 (range, 50–150) minutes. Postoperatively, the median time for first bowel movement was four (range, 2–10) days. Median hospital stay was seven (range, 3–23) days. Overall, 15 patients (60 percent) either improved or remained unchanged with respect to continence. There was an improvement in 10 of 20 patients (50 percent) among those with continence Grade 2 or more (P<0.05). Seven patients (28 percent) remained incontinent. No patient became more incontinent after surgery. Constipation, which was present in 9 patients (36 percent) preoperatively, affected 11 patients (44 percent) after rectopexy (P>0.05; not significant). Postoperative morbidity included a port site hernia and deep venous thrombosis in one patient, a repaired rectal perforation, a retroperitoneal hematoma with prolonged ileus (1 case), and a superficial wound infection (1 case). One patient with solitary rectal ulcer syndrome in the laparoscopic surgery group remained unhealed despite resolution of the rectal prolapse after rectopexy and required abdominoperineal resection. Two patients (laparoscopic surgery = 1 and open surgery = 1) had severe constipation after surgery and both required loop colostomies. There were no cases of operative mortality or recurrent prolapse. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic suture rectopexy without resection is both safe and effective in this frequently frail population and offers a minimally invasive approach that may have potential advantages for selected groups of patients with full-thickness rectal prolapse.

Key words

Laparoscopic Rectopexy Rectal prolapse 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Stevenson AR, Stitz RW, Lumley JW. Laparoscopic-assisted resection-rectopexy for rectal prolapse: early and medium follow-up. Dis Colon Rectum 1998;41:46–54.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hartley JE, Farouk R, Monson JR. Laparoscopic suture rectopexy for full thickness rectal prolapse. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 1996;5:540–42.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Darzi A, Henry MM, Guillou PJ, Shorvon P, Monson JR. Stapled laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse. Surg Endosc 1995;9:301–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sayfan J, Pinho M, Alexander-Williams J, Keighley MR. Sutured posterior abdominal rectopexy with sigmoidectomy compared with Marlex mesh rectopexy. Br J Surg 1990;77:143–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Browning GG, Parks AG. Postanal repair for neuropathic faecal incontinence: correlation of clinical result and anal canal pressures. Br J Surg 1983;70:101–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kamm MA. The surgical treatment of severe idiopathic constipation. Int J Colorectal Dis 1985;2:229–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Monson JR, Jones NA, Vowden P, Brennan TG. Delorme's operation: the first choice in complete rectal prolapse? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1996; 68:143–6.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Watts JD, Rothenberger DA, Buls JG, Goldberg SM, Nivatvongs S. The management of procidentia: 30 years' experience. Dis Colon Rectum 1985;28:96–102.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jacobs LK, Lin YJ, Orkin BA. The best operation for rectal prolapse. Surg Clin North Am 1997;77:49–70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mann CV, Hoffman C. Complete rectal prolapse: the anatomical and functional results of treatment by an extended abdominal rectopexy. Br J Surg 1988;75:34–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Blatchford GJ, Perry RE, Thorson AG, Christensen MA. Rectopexy without resection for rectal prolapse. Am J Surg 1989;158:574–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fryckman HM, Goldberg SM. The surgical treatment of rectal procidentia. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1969;129:125–30.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Poen AC, de Brauw M, Felt-Bersma RJ, de Jong D, Cuesta MA. Laparoscopic rectopexy for complete rectal prolapse. Clinical outcome and anorectal function tests. Surg Endosc 1996;10:904–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Deen KI, Grant E, Billingham C, Keighley MR. Abdominal resection rectopexy with pelvic floor repair versus perineal rectosigmoidectomy and pelvic floor repair for full-thickness rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 1994;81:302–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Prasad ML, Pearl RK, Abcarian H, Orsay CP, Nelson RL. Perineal proctectomy, posterior rectopexy, and postanal levator repair for the treatment of rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 1986;29:547–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gopal KA, Amshel AL, Shonberg IL, Eftaiha M. Rectal procidentia in elderly and debilitated patients: experiences with the Altemeier procedure. Dis Colon Rectum 1984;27:376–81.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ramanujam PS, Ventatesh KS. Perineal excision of rectal prolapse with posterior levator ani repair in elderly high-risk patients. Dis Colon Rectum 1988;31:704–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Williams JG, Rothenburger DA, Madoff RD, Goldberg SM. Treatment of rectal prolapse in the elderly by perineal rectosigmoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 1992;35:830–4.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Thompson JP, Ross AH. Management of infection after prosthetic abdominal rectopexy (Wells procedure). Br J Surg 1989;76:610–2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Carter AE. Retrosacral suture fixation for complete rectal prolapse in the elderly, the frail and the demented. Br J Surg 1983;70:522–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Duthie GS, Bartolo DC. Abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a comparison of techniques. Br J Surg 1992;79:107–13.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Duthie GS, Bartolo DC. A comparison between Marlex and resection rectopexy. Neth J Surg 1989;41:136–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Baker R, Senagore AJ, Luchtefeld MA. Laparoscopic-assistedvs. open resection: rectopexy offers excellent results. Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:199–201.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Heine JA, Wong WD. Rectal prolapse. In: Mazier WP, Levien DH, Luchtefeld MA, Senagore AJ, eds. Surgery of the colon, rectum and anus. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1995;515.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Speakman CT, Madden MV, Nicholls RJ, Kamm MA. Lateral ligament division during rectopexy causes constipation but prevents recurrences: results of a prospective randomised study. Br J Surg 1991;78:1431–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Scaglia M, Fasth S, Hallgren T, Nordgren S, Oresland T, Hulten L. Abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse: influence of surgical technique on functional outcome. Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:805–13.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hinton JM, Lennard-Jones JE, Young AC. A new method for studying gut transit times using radio-opaque markers. Gut 1969;10:842–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Keighley MR, Shouler P. Clinical and manometric features of the solitary rectal ulcer syndrome. Dis Colon Rectum 1984;27:507–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Penfold JC, Hawley PR. Experiences of Ivalon-sponge implant for complete rectal prolapse at St Mark's Hospital, 1960–1970. Br J Surg 1972;59:846–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Porter NH. A physiological study of the pelvic floor in rectal prolapse. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1962;31:379–404.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ejerblad S, Krause U. Repair of rectal prolapse by rectosacral suture fixation. Acta Chir Scand 1988;154:103–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Keighley MR, Fielding JW, Alexander Williams J. Results of Marlex mesh abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse in 100 consecutive patients. Br J Surg 1983;70:229–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    McKee RF, Lauder JC, Poon FW, Aitchison MA, Finlay IG. A prospective randomised study of abdominal rectopexy with and without sigmoidectomy in rectal prolapse. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1992;174:145–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Cirocco WC, Brown AC. Anterior resection for the treatment of rectal prolapse: a 20 year experience. Am Surg 1993;59:265–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Nicholls RJ, Simson JN. Anteroposterior rectopexy in the treatment of solitary rectal ulcer syndrome without overt rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 1996;73:222–4.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Novell JR, Osborne MJ, Winslet MC, Lewis AA. Prospective randomised trial of Ivalon sponge versus sutured rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 1994;81:904–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. M. Heah
    • 1
  • J. E. Hartley
    • 1
  • J. Hurley
    • 1
  • G. S. Duthie
    • 1
  • J. R. T. Monson
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryThe University of Hull, Academic Surgical Unit, Castle Hill HospitalHullUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations