Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Rectal compliance in females with obstructed defecation

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study was designed to investigate whether rectal compliance is altered in females with obstructed defecation. METHODS: Eighty female patients with obstructed defecation and 60 control subjects were studied. Rectal compliance was measured with an “infinitely compliant” polyethylene bag. This bag was inserted in the rectum and inflated with air to selected pressure plateaus (range, 0–60 mmHg; cumulative steps of 2 mmHg with a duration of ten seconds) using a computer-controlled electromechanical barostat system. Volume changes at the levels of distending pressures were recorded. The distending pressures, needed to evoke first sensation of content in the rectum, earliest urge to defecate, and the maximum tolerable volume were noted. RESULTS: In all cases, the compliance curve had a characteristic triphasic (S-shaped) form. The mean compliance curve obtained from the patients was identical to that of the controls. However, the course of the compliance curve fell above the normal range (mean + 2 SD) in 14 patients. In ten (71 percent) of these patients, a large rectocele was seen at evacuation proctography. Such a rectocele was observed in only five patients (7.6 percent) with a normal compliance curve (P<0.001). Eighty percent of the controls experienced earliest urge to defecate during the second phase of the curve. In 75 percent of the patients, this occurred in the third phase. The mean pressure threshold for first sensation, earliest urge to defecate, and maximum tolerable volume were significantly higher in patients compared with control subjects. Ten of the patients experienced no sensation at all in the pressure range between 0 and 60 mmHg. CONCLUSION: In females with obstructed defection, the compliance of the rectal wall is normal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schouten WR, Briel JW, Auwerda JJ,et al. Anismus: fact or fiction? Dis Colon Rectum 1997;40:1033–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jones PN, Lubowski DZ, Swash M, Henry MM. Is paradoxical contraction of the puborectalis muscle of functional importance? Dis Colon Rectum 1987;30:667–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Voderholzer WA, Neuhaus DA, Klauser AG, Tzavella K, Müller-Lissner SA, Schindbeck NE. Paradoxical sphincter contraction is rarely indicated for anismus. Gut 1997;41:258–262.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Schouten WR, Gosselink MJ, Boerma MO, Ginai AZ. Rectal wall contractility in response to an evoked urge to defecate in patients with obstructed defecation. Dis Colon Rectum 1998;41:473–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Madoff RD, Orrom WJ, Rothenberger DA, Goldberg SM. Rectal compliance: a critical reappraisal. Int J Colorectal Dis 1990;5:37–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Read NW, Abouzetery L, Read MG, Howell P, Ottewell D, Donnelly TC. Anorectal function in elderly patients with fecal impaction. Gastroenterology 1985;89:956–66.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rasmussen O, Christensen B, Sorensen M, Tetzschner T, Christiansen J. Rectal compliance in the assessment of patients with fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 1990;33:650–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Varma JS, Smith AN. Neurophysiological dysfunction in young women with intractable constipation. Gut 1988;29:963–8

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Waldron D, Bowes KL, Kingma YL, Cote KR. Colonic and anorectal motility in young women with intractable constipation. Gastroenterology 1988;95:1388–94.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bannister JJ, Timms JM, Barfield LJ, Donnelly TC, Read NW. Physiological studies in young women with chronic constipation. Int J Colorectal Dis 1986;1:175–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Read NW, Timms JM, Barfield LJ, Donnelly TC, Bannister JJ. Impairment of defecation in young women with severe constipation. Gastroenterology 1986;90:53–60.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Roe AM, Bartolo DC, Mortensen NJ. Slow transit constipation. Comparison between patients with and without previous hysterectomy. Dig Dis Sci 1988;33:1159–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. De Medici A, Badiali D, Corazziari E, Bausano G, Anzini F. Rectal sensitivity in chronic constipation. Dig Dis Sci 1989;34:747–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wald A, Hinds JP, Caruana BJ. Psychological characteristics of patients with severe idiopathic constipation. Br J Surg 1989;97:932–7.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Toma TP, Zighelboim J, Phillips SF, Talley NJ. Methods for studying intestinal sensitivity and compliance: in vitro studies of balloons and a barostat. Neurogastroenterol Motil 1996;8:19–28.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Whitehead WE, Delvaux M. Standardization of barostat procedures for testing smooth muscle tone and sensory thresholds in the gastrointestinal tract. The Working Team of Glaxo-Wellcome Research, UK. Dig Dis Sci 1997;42:223–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ginai AZ. Evacuation proctography (defecography): a new seat and method of fixation. Clin Radiol 1990;42:214–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Varma JS, Smith AN, Busuttil A. Correlation of clinical and manometric abnormalities of rectal function following chronic radiation injury. Br J Surg 1985;72:875–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Babb RR. Radiation proctitis: a review. Am J Gastroenterol 1996;91:1309–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Loening-Baucke V, Metcalf AM, Shirazi S. Anorectal manometry in active and quiescent ulcerative colitis. Am J Gastroenterol 1989;84:892–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gregersen H, Kassab G. Biomechanics of the gastrointestinal tract. Neurogastroenterol Motil 1996;8:277–97.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ackervall S, Fasth S, Nordgren S, Oresland T, Hultén L. Manovolumetry: a new method for investigation of anorectal function. Gut 1988;29:614–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Martinson J. Studies on the afferent vagal control of the stomach. Acta Physiol Scand Suppl 1965;65:255:1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sundin T, Carlsson LA. Reconstruction of severed dorsal roots innervating the urinary bladder. An experimental study in cats. I. Studies on the normal afferent pathways in the pelvic and pudendal nerves. Scand J Urol Nephrol 1972;6:176–84.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Azpiroz F, Malagelada JR. Physiological variations in canine gastric tone measured by an electronic barostat. Am J Physiol 1985;248:229–37.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Rao GN, Drew PJ, Monson RT, Duthie GS. Incremental elastic modulus—a challenge to compliance. Int J Colorectal Dis 1997;12:33–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Dall FH, Jorgensen CS, Houe D, Gregersen H, Djurhuus JD. Biomechanical wall properties of the human rectum. A study with impedance planimetry. Gut 1993;34:1581–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Alstrup NI, Skjoldbye B, Rasmussen OO, Christensen NE, Christiansen J. Rectal compliance determined by rectal endosonography: a new application of endosonography. Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:32–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sun WM, McDonagh R, Forster D, Thomas DG, Smallwood R, Read NW. Anorectal function in patients with complete spinal transection before and after sacral posterior rhizotomy. Gastroenterology 1995;108:990–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Glick ME, Meshkinpour H, Haldeman S, Hoehler F, Downey N, Bradley WE. Colonic dysfunction in patients with thoracic spinal cord injury. Gastroenterology 1984;86:287–94.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Glavind EB, Forman A, Madsen G, Svane D, Andersson KE, Tottrup A. Mechanical properties of isolated smooth muscle from human rectum and internal anal sphincter. Am J Physiol 1993;265:G792–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Rao SS, Read NW, Davison PA, Bannister JJ, Holdsworth CP. Anorectal sensitivity and responses to rectal distention in patients with ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology 1987;93:1270–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Denis P, Colin R, Galmiche JP,et al. Elastic properties of the rectal wall in normal adults and in patients with ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology 1979;77:45–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. From the Colorectal Research Group, Department, Depart of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

    M. J. Gosselink M.D. & W. C. J. Hop Ph.D.

  2. From the Colorectal Research Group, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

    W. R. Schouten Ph.D.

Authors
  1. M. J. Gosselink M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. W. C. J. Hop Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. W. R. Schouten Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

About this article

Cite this article

Gosselink, M.J., Hop, W.C.J. & Schouten, W.R. Rectal compliance in females with obstructed defecation. Dis Colon Rectum 44, 971–977 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02235485

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02235485

Key words

Search

Navigation