Abstract
PURPOSE: We observed small spots at the margin of rectal carcinomas on endorectal ultrasonography. Our aim was to study the relationship between ultrasonographic evidence of these spots and histologic characteristics of disease and postoperative recurrence. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study group comprised 55 patients, 36 men and 19 women, with rectal carcinoma as confirmed by biopsy. The patients were followed up at three-month intervals for six months to three years and six months after the operation. Endorectal ultrasonography was performed in the usual manner. Surgically resected specimens were stained with hematoxylin and eosin and histologically examined. Vessel invasion was graded from 0 (not invasive) to 3 (most invasive). RESULTS: Among the 55 patients studied, 3 had Stage T2,N0,M0 rectal carcinomas and 35 had Stage T3,N0,M0 carcinomas, 5 (14.3 percent) of whom had echographic evidence of small spots. Thirteen patients had Stage T3,N1/2,M0 carcinomas, comprising 12 (92.3 percent) with small spots, and four patients had T3,N1/2,M1 carcinomas, all with small spots. Vessel invasion of Grade 2 or higher was observed around the carcinomas in 20 of 21 patients who had small spots. Ten of 13 patients with many spots at the margin of the carcinoma (a spot grade of ++) histologically had marked venous or lymphatic invasion (an invasion Grade 3). The presence of small spots was closely associated with massive venous or lymphatic invasion (a vessel invasion grade of 2 or more). Four patients had synchronous liver metastases, and small spots were found in all four. Distant metastases and local recurrence were found in 11 of 21 patients with small spots. We found no recurrence in any patient without small spots on endorectal ultrasonography. CONCLUSIONS: Small spots indicate the presence of massive venous or lymphatic invasion and a high risk of postoperative recurrence.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Phillips RK, Hittinger R, Blesovsky L, Fry JS, Fielding LP. Local recurrence following ‘curative’ surgery for large bowel cancer. II. The rectum and rectosigmoid. Br J Surg 1984;71:17–20.
Quirke P, Durdey P, Dixon MF, Williams NS. Local recurrence of rectal adenocarcinoma due to inadequate surgical resection. Lancet 1986;2:996–9.
Abulafi AM, Williams NS. Local recurrence of colorectal cancer: the problem, mechanisms, management and adjuvant therapy. Br J Surg 1994;81:7–19.
Minsky BD, Mies C, Recht A, Rich TA, Chaffey JT. Resectable adenocarcinoma of the rectosigmoid and rectum. II. The influence of blood vessels invasion. Cancer 1988;61:1417–24.
Spratt JS Jr, Spjut HJ. Prevalence and prognosis of individual clinical and pathologic variables associated with colorectal carcinoma. Cancer 1967;20:1976–85.
Saitoh N, Okui K, Sarashina H, Suzuki M, Arai T, Nunomura M. Evaluation of echographic diagnosis of rectal cancer using intrarectal ultrasonic examination. Dis Colon Rectum 1986;29:234–42.
Glaser F, Schlag P, Herfarth CH. Endorectal ultrasonography for the assessment of invasion of rectal tumors and lymph node involvement. Br J Surg 1990;77:883–7.
Hildebrandt U, Klein T, Feifel G, Schwarz H-P, Koch B, Schmitt RM. Endosonography of pararectal lymph nodes:in vitro andin vivo evaluation. Dis Colon Rectum 1990;33:863–8.
Morodomi T, Isomoto H, Shirouzu K, Kakegawa K, Irie K, Morimatsu M. An index for estimating the probability of lymph node metastasis in rectal cancers. Cancer 1989;63:539–43.
Luebbers EL, Pretlow TP, Emancipator SN,et al. Heterogeneity and prognostic significance of macrophages in human colonic carcinoma. Cancer Res 1985;45:5196–200.
Lindmark G, Elvin A, Pahlman L, Glimelius B. The value of endosonography in preoperative staging of rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 1992;7:162–6.
Rafaelson SR, Kronborg O, Fenger C. Echo pattern of lymph nodes in colorectal cancer: anin vitro study. Br J Radiol 1992;65:218–20.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Sunouchi, K., Sakaguchi, M., Higuchi, Y. et al. Small spot sign of rectal carcinoma by endorectal ultrasonography. Dis Colon Rectum 41, 649–653 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02235276
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02235276