Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

, Volume 44, Issue 1, pp 128–130 | Cite as

Nipple complication caused by a mesenteric GORE-TEX® sling reinforcement in a kock ileal reservoir

Report of a case
  • Paul J. Klingler
  • Beate Neuhauser
  • Regina Peer
  • Christoph H. Klingler
  • Ernst Bodner
Case Report


INTRODUCTION: The surgical trend after proctocolectomy at present is to perform a pelvic pouch reservoir with an ileoanal anastomosis. Before that a continent ileal Kock pouch was the procedure of choice, which enabled the patient to collect the intestinal discharge for several hours and avoid involuntary escape of reservoir contents, thus making the wearing of plastic bags unnecessary. Although in the majority of patients an increased life quality can be observed, different complications with a Kock pouch may occur. METHODS: We present a case of a young female with signs of outlet obstruction several years after a Kock reservoir was performed because of complicated ulcerative colitis. The obstruction was caused by a fecal-coated GORE-TEX® sling that had penetrated through the nipple-valve base into the pouch. The mesenteric sling was introduced as a modification of the original Kock procedure to reinforce the efferent ileal segment, thus preventing nipple prolapse. The perforation site was closed with interrupted sutures and an ileostomy was performed. RESULTS: Three months thereafter, the ileostomy was closed and at a follow-up visit one year later the patient had no complaints and a well-functioning reservoir. CONCLUSION: If continence is desired after definitive ileostomy or if failure of the ileoanal reservoir occurs, a Kock pouch procedure still has a place in the surgical armamentarium of colorectal surgery. Many experts today do not use sling reinforcement maneuvers, and most of these procedures seem to work well without it.

Key words

Ileal reservoir Kock pouch Complication Sling reinforcement 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Heuschen UA, Heuschen G, Herfarth C. Quality of life after proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis [in German]. Chirurg 1998;69:1045–51.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sansonna F, Razzi S, Parini U. Surgical indications and reconstructive techniques in the treatment of chronic forms of ulcerative rectocolitis. Review of the literature [in Italian]. Minerva Chir 1996;51:329–36.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ecker KW, Haberer M, Feifel G. Conversion of the failing ileoanal pouch to reservoir-ileostomy rather than to ileostomy alone. Dis Colon Rectum 1996;39:977–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fazio VW, Church JM. Complications and function of the continent ileostomy at the Cleveland Clinic. World J Surg 1988;12:148–54.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fazio VW, Tjandra JJ. Technique for nipple valve fixation to prevent valve slippage in continent ileostomy. Dis Colon Rectum 1992;35:1177–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ecker KW, Hildebrandt U, Haberer M, Feifel G. Biomechanical stabilization of the nipple valve in continent ileostomy. Br J Surg 1996;83:1582–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Vernava AM, Goldberg SM. Is the Kock pouch still a viable option? Int J Colorectal Dis 1988;3:135–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Behrens DT, Paris M, Luttrell JN. Conversion of failed ileal pouch-anal anastomosis to continent ileostomy. Dis Colon Rectum 1999;42:490–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul J. Klingler
    • 1
  • Beate Neuhauser
    • 1
  • Regina Peer
    • 2
  • Christoph H. Klingler
    • 3
  • Ernst Bodner
    • 1
  1. 1.From the Department of SurgeryUniversity Hospital of InnsbruckInnsbruck
  2. 2.From the Department of RadiologyUniversity Hospital of InnsbruckInnsbruck
  3. 3.Department of UrologyGeneral Hospital of Vienna (VKH)ViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations