Advertisement

Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

, Volume 44, Issue 6, pp 871–875 | Cite as

Does stool collection method affect outcomes in immunochemical fecal occult blood testing?

  • Hidenori Nakama
  • Bing Zhang
  • A. S. M. Abdul Fattah
  • Noboru Kamijo
Original Contributions

Abstract

PURPOSE: This paper compares the positive predictive value of an immunochemical fecal occult blood test for colorectal neoplasms between the stool specimens obtained during the digital rectal examination and those obtained during the routine screening. METHODS: In a medical check-up, 1,688 subjects received both an immunochemical fecal occult blood test and a colonoscopy. Fecal occult blood was tested by two methods: digital rectal examination and routine screening. The positivity rate of an immunochemical fecal occult blood test and the positive predictive value for colorectal cancer and large adenomatous polyp were determined by these two methods. RESULTS: The positivity rate and the positive predictive value were 5.4 percent and 19.8 percent (4.4 percent for cancer and 15.4 percent for adenomatous polyp) in the digital rectal examination method and 3.5 percent and 27.1 percent (6.8 percent for cancer and 20.3 percent for adenomatous polyp) in the routine screening method, respectively. These figures indicate a significant difference in the positivity rate (P<0.01) and the positive predictive value (P<0.05) between these two methods. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that the stool obtained by routine screening has a better positive predictive value than stool collected during the digital rectal examination.

Key words

Colorectal neoplasms Digital rectal examination Immunochemical fecal occult blood test Positive predictive value 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Marks RD, Hall G, Vcerapalli R, Singh S. Fecal occult blood testing: does the stool collection method affect outcome? [abstract] Gastroenterology 1997;112(Suppl):A29Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Longstreth FG. Checking for the ‘occult’ with a finger: a procedure of little value. J Clin Gastroenterol 1988;10:133–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Eisner MS, Lewis JH. Diagnostic yield of a positive fecal occult blood test found on digital rectal examination: dose the finger count? Arch Intern Med 1991;151:2180–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brint SL, DiPalna JA, Herrera JL. Is a Hemoccult positive rectal examination clinically significant? South Med J 1993;86:601–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rockey DR, Koch J, Cello JP, Sanders LL. Relative frequency of upper gastrointestinal and colonic lesions in patients with positive fecal occult-blood tests. N Engl J Med 1998;339:153–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nakama H, Kamijo N, Fujimori K, Fattah AS, Zhang B. Diagnostic accuracy of immunochemical feacal occult blood test for gastric cancer. J Med Screen 1996;3:113–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Simon JB. Occult blood screening for colorectal cancer: a critical review. Gastroenterology 1985;88:820–37.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rockey D, Auslander A, Greenberg P. Detection of occult upper gastrointestinal blood with fecal occult blood tests [abstract]. Gastroenterology 1997;112(Suppl):A40.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Akdamar K, Ertan A, Agrawal NM, McMahon FG, Ryan J. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in normal asymptomatic volunteers. Gastrointest Endosc 1986;302:749–52.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zuckerman G, Benitez J. A prospective study of bidirectional endoscopy (colonoscopy and upper endoscopy) in the evaluation of patients with occult gastrointestinal bleeding. Am J Gastroenterol 1992;87:62–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hsia PC, al-Kawas FH. Yield of upper endoscopy in the evaluation of asymptomatic patients with Hemoccult-positive stool after a negative colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 1992;87:1571–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chen YK, Gladden DR, Kestenbaum DJ, Collen MJ. Is there a role for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in the evaluation of patients with blood-positive stool and negative colonoscopy? Am J Gastroenterol 1993;88:2026–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Geller AJ, Kolts BE, Achem SR, Wears R. The high frequency of upper gastrointestinal pathology in patients with fecal occult blood and colon polyp. Am J Gastroenterol 1993;88:1184–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Barnet JL, Raper SE. Anorectal diseases. In: Yamada T, ed. Textbook of gastroenterology. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott 1995;2027–50:Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kewenter J, Hellzen-Ingemarsson A, Kewenter G. Diverticular disease and minor rectal bleeding. Scand J Gastroenterol 1985;20:922–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nakama H, Kamijo N, Fujimori K. Immunochemical feacal occult blood test is not suitable for diagnosis of hemorrhoids. Am J Med 1997;102:551–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nakama H, Kamijo N, Fujimori K. Clinical diagnostic accuracy of feacal occult blood test for anal disease. Int J Qual Health Care 1997;9:139–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gnauck R, Macrae FA, Fleisher M. How to perform the fecal occult blood test. CA 1984;34:134–47.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Knight KK, Fielding JE, Battista RN. Occult blood screening for colorectal cancer. JAMA 1989;261:586–93.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hidenori Nakama
    • 3
  • Bing Zhang
    • 3
  • A. S. M. Abdul Fattah
    • 1
    • 3
  • Noboru Kamijo
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Internal MedicineAizawa HospitalJapan
  2. 2.Department Internal MedicineHata Central HospitalAsabiJapan
  3. 3.Department of Public HealthShinshu University School of MedicineMatsumotoJapan

Personalised recommendations