Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

, Volume 44, Issue 10, pp 1474–1477 | Cite as

Anocutaneous advancement flap repair of transsphincteric fistulas

  • David D. E. Zimmerman
  • John W. Briel
  • Martijn P. Gosselink
  • W. Rudolf Schouten
Original Contributions
  • 57 Downloads

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the healing rate of transsphincteric perianal fistulas after anocutaneous advancement flap repair and to examine the impact of this procedure on fecal continence. METHODS: Between January 1997 and June 1999, 26 consecutive patients with a transsphincteric perianal fistual passing through the middle or upper third of the external anal sphincter underwent anocutaneous advancement flap repair. There were six female patients, and the median age was 39 (range, 27–54) years. Twenty patients (77 percent) had previously undergone one or more prior attempts at repair. With the patient in the prone-jackknife position, the internal opening of the fistual was exposed using a Lone Star Retractor System, and the crypt-bearing tissue around the internal opening as well as the overlying anoderm was excised. An (inverted) U-shaped flap, including perianal skin and fat, was created. The base of the flap was approximately twice the width of its apex. The flap was advanced and sutured to the mucosa and underlying internal anal sphincter proximal to the closed internal opening. The median follow-up time was 25 months. Fecal continence was evaluated in 23 patients by means of a questionnaire. RESULTS: Anocutaneous advancement flap repair was successful in 12 patients (46 percent). Success was inversely correlated with the number of prior attempts. In patients who had undergone no or only one previous attempt at repair (n=9), the healing rate was 78 percent. In patients with two or more previous repairs (n=17) the healing rate was only 29 percent. In seven patients (30 percent) continence deteriorated after anocutaneous advancement flap repair. Eleven patients (48 percent) had a completely normal continence preoperatively. Two of these patients (18 percent) encountered soiling and incontinence for gas after the procedure, whereas two subjects (18 percent) complained of accidental bowel movements. Twelve patients (52 percent) presented with continence disturbances at the time of admission to our hospital. In this group, deterioration was observed in two patients (17 percent). CONCLUSION: The results of anocutaneous advancement flap repair in patients with no or only one previous attempt at repair are moderate. In patients who have undergone two or more previous attempts at repair the outcome is poor. Based on the relatively low healing rate and deterioration of continence, this procedure seems less suitable for high transsphincteric fistulas than transanal mucosal advancement flap repair.

Keywords

Transsphincteric Fistula Anocutaneous Advancement Flap Fecal Incontinence 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Lunniss PJ, Kamm MA, Phillips RK. Factors affecting continence after surgery for anal fistula. Br J Surg 1994;81:1382–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Van Tets WF, Kuijpers HC. Continence disorders after anal fistulotomy. Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:1194–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Oh C. Management of high recurrent anal fistula. Surgery 1983;93:330–2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Aguilar PS, Plasencia G, Hardy TG, Hartman RF, Stewart WR. Mucosal advancement in the treatment of anal fistula. Dis Colon Rectum 1985;28:496–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wedell J, Meier zu Eissen P, Banzhaf G, Kleine L. Sliding flap advancement for the treatment of high level fistulae. Br J Surg 1987;74:390–1.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Schouten WR, Zimmerman DD, Briel JW. Transanal advancement flap repair of transsphincteric fistulas. Dis Colon Rectum 1999;42:1419–23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Del Pino A, Nelson RL, Pearl RK, Abcarian H. Island flap anoplasty for treatment of transsphincteric fistulainano. Dis Colon Rectum 1996;39:224–6.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kohler A, Athanasiadis S. Anodermal advancement flap-plasty as alternative treatment method to endorectal closure techniques in therapy of high anal fistulas. A prospective study of 31 patients [in German]. Chirurg 1996;67:1244–50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Robertson WG, Mangione JS. Cutaneous advancement flap closure: alternative method for treatment of complicated anal fistulas. Dis Colon Rectum 1998;41:884–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jun SH, Choi GS. Anocutaneous advancement flap closure of high anal fistulas. Br J Surg 1999;86:490–2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Parks AG. Anorectal incontinence. J R Soc Med 1975;68:21–30.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shemesh EI, Kodner IJ, Fry RD, Neufeld DM. Endorectal sliding flap repair of complicated anterior anoperineal fistulas. Dis Colon Rectum 1988;31:22–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kodner IJ, Mazor A, Shemesh EI, Fry RD, Fleshman JW, Birnbaum EH. Endorectal advancement flap repair of rectovaginal and other complicated anorectal fistulas. Surgery 1993;114:682–90.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ozuner G, Hull TL, Cartmill J, Fazio VW. Long-term analysis of the use of transanal rectal advancement flaps for complicated anorectal/vaginal fistulas. Dis Colon Rectum 1996;39:10–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bielefeldt K, Enck P, Erckenbrecht JF. Sensory and motor function in the maintenance of anal continence. Dis Colon Rectum 1990;33:674–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • David D. E. Zimmerman
    • 1
  • John W. Briel
    • 1
  • Martijn P. Gosselink
    • 1
  • W. Rudolf Schouten
    • 1
  1. 1.From the Colorectal Research Group of the Department of SurgeryErasmus Medical Center RotterdamRotterdamthe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations