Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Early reoperation for perirectal abscess

A preventable complication

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to analyze failures in the operative management of perirectal abscesses resulting in early reoperation. METHODS: This was a retrospective case study of 500 consecutive patients who underwent 627 drainage procedures for a perirectal abscess. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients (7.6 percent of all drainage procedures) required reoperation within ten days of the original procedure. The main factors leading to reoperation were incomplete drainage (23 patients), missed loculations within a drained abscess (15 patients), missed abscesses (4 patients), and postoperative bleeding (3 patients). Incomplete drainage was more common with simple perirectal abscesses, whereas most overlooked collections were located posteriorly. Horseshoe abscesses were associated with a particularly high rate (50 percent) of operative failures. Neither preexisting perianal pathology nor systemic immunosuppressive disease contributed to early failures. CONCLUSION: Surgical errors are the leading cause of early failures in the surgical treatment of perianal abscesses. These errors occur in a limited number of typical patterns and can therefore be identified and taught with an aim to decrease their occurrence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hyman N. Anorectal abscess and fistula. Prim Care 1999;26:69–80.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sailer M, Bussen D, Debus ES, Fuchs KH, Thiede A. Quality of life in patients with benign anorectal disorders. Br J Surg 1998;85:1716–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Read DR, Abcarian H. A prospective survey of 474 patients with anorectal abscess. Dis Colon Rectum 1979;22:566–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cox SW, Senagore AJ, Luchtefeld MA, Mazier WP. Outcome after incision and drainage with fistulotomy for ischiorectal abscess. Am Surg 1997;63:686–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tang C-L, Chew S-P, Seow-Choen F. Prospective randomized trial of drainage alonevs. drainage and fistulotomy for acute perianal abscesses with proven internal opening. Dis Colon Rectum 1996;39:1415–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Nagle D, Rolandelli RH. Primary care office management of perianal and anal disease. Prim Care 1996;23:609–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mortensen J, Kraglund K, Klaerke M, Jaeger G, Svane S, Bone J. Primary suture of anorectal abscess: a randomized study comparing treatment with clindamycinvs. clindamycin and Gentacoll®. Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:398–401.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fielding MA, Berry AR. Management of perianal sepsis in a district general hospital. J R Coll Surg Edinb 1992;37:232–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ho Y-H, Tan M, Chui C-H, Leong A, Eu K-W, Seow-Choen F. Randomized controlled trial of primary fistulotomy with drainage alone for perianal abscesses. Dis Colon Rectum 1997;40:1435–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ramanujam PS, Prasad M, Abcarian H, Tan AB. Perianal abscesses and fistulas: a study of 1023 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 1984;27:593–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Chrabot CM, Prasad M, Abcarian H. Recurrent anorectal abscesses. Dis Colon Rectum 1983;26:105–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Shafik A. A new concept of the anatomy of the anal sphincter mechanism and the physiology of defection. VI. The central abscess: a new clinicopathologic entity in the genesis of anorectal suppuration. Dis Colon Rectum 1979;22:336–41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Onaca, N., Hirshberg, A. & Adar, R. Early reoperation for perirectal abscess. Dis Colon Rectum 44, 1469–1472 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02234599

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02234599

Key words

Navigation