Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

, Volume 44, Issue 10, pp 1421–1426 | Cite as

Outcome of sphincteroplasty combined with surgery for urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse

  • Amy L. Halverson
  • Tracy L. Hull
  • Maria F. Paraiso
  • Crina Floruta
Original Contributions
  • 27 Downloads

Abstract

PURPOSE: This is the first reported prospective study comparing outcome and cost in patients undergoing sphincteroplasty for anal incontinencevs. sphincteroplasty performed in combination with one or more procedures for urinary incontinence and/or pelvic organ prolapse. METHODS: We analyzed 44 patients with fecal incontinence who underwent anal sphincter repair alone (20 patients) or in combination with procedures for urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse (24 patients). Information regarding risk factors for fecal incontinence, the degree of incontinence, and the extent that incontinence limited social, physical, and sexual activity was prospectively obtained from questionnaires. Clinic chart reviews and follow-up telephone interviews provided additional data. A cohort of case-matched patients who underwent only urogynecologic procedures was compared retrospectively for operative time, hospital cost, length of stay, and postoperative complications. RESULTS: There were no major complications in any group. The functional outcomes, physical, social, and sexual activity were similar in all three groups. Twenty-two of 24 patients who underwent the combined procedures were glad that they had both procedures concomitantly. CONCLUSION: Combination pelvic floor surgery provides good outcomes and is cost effective. This approach should be offered to women with concurrent problems of fecal and urinary incontinence and/or pelvic organ prolapse.

Key words

Fecal incontinence Urinary incontinence Pelvic organ prolapse Anal sphincter repair 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Thomas TM, Egan M, Walgrove A, Mead TW. The prevalence of faecal and double incontinence. Community Med 1984;6:216–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kok AM, Voorhrst FJ, Burger CW, van Houten P, Kenemans P, Janessens J. Urinary and faecal incontinence in community-residing elderly women. Age Ageing 1992;21:211–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Caputo RM, Benson JT. Idiopathic fecal incontinence. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 1992;4:565–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mcintosh LJ, Frahm JD, Mallett VT, Richardson DA. Pelvic floor rehabilitation in the treatment of incontinence. J Reprod Med 1993;38:662–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jackson SL, Weber AM, Hull TL, Mitchinson AR, Walters MD. Fecal incontinence in women with urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 1997;89:423–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Baden WF, Walker T. Fundamentals, symptoms and classification. In: Baden WF, Walker T, eds. Surgical repair of vaginal defects. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott, 1992:9–23.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Slade MS, Goldberg SM, Schotter JL,et al. Sphincteroplasty for acquired anal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 1977;20:33–50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Swash M, Snooks SJ, Henry MM. Unifying concept of pelvic floor disorders and incontinence. J Royal Soc Med 1985;78:906–11.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Smith AB, Hosker GL, Warrell DW. The role of pudendal nerve damage in the aetiology of genuine stress incontinence in women. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1989;96:29–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Snooks SJ, Badenoch DF, Tiptaft RC, Swash M. Perineal nerve damage in genuine stress urinary incontinence. Br J Urol 1985;57:422–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Allen RE, Hosker GL, Smith AR, Warrel DW. Pelvic floor damage and childbirth: a neurophysiology study. Br J Obstet Gynecol 1990;97:770–9.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Snooks SJ, Stechell M, Swash M, Henry MM. Injury to innervation of pelvic floor sphincter musculature in childbirth. Lancet 1984;2:546–50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Snooks AJ, Barnes PR, Swash M, Henry MM. Increase in pudendal nerve terminal motor latency with defecation straining. Br J Surg 1988;75:1095–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jorge JM, Wexner SD. Etiology and management fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 1993;36:77–97.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rockwood TH, Church JM, Fleshman JW,et al. Patient and surgeon ranking of the severity of symptoms associated with fecal incontinence: the fecal incontinence severity index. Dis Colon Rectum 1999;42:1525–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shelton A, Madoff R. Defining anal incontinence: establishing a uniform continence scale. Semin Colon Rectal Surg 1997;8:54–60.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Olivera L, Pfiefer J, Wexner SD. Physiological and clinical outcome of anterior sphincteroplasty. Br J Surg 1996;83:502–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ctercteko GC, Fazio VW, Jagelman DG, Lavery IC, Weakly FL, Melia M. Anal sphincter repair: a report of 60 cases and review of the literature. Aust N Z J Surg 1988;58:703–10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fang DT, Nivatvongs S, Vermeulen FD, Herman FN, Goldberg SM, Rothenberger DA. Overlapping sphincteroplasty for acquired anal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 1984;27:720–2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Malouf AJ, Norton CS, Engel AF, Nicholls RJ, Kamm MA. Long-term results of overlapping anterior anal-sphincter repair for obstetric trauma. Lancet 2000;355:260–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Karoui S, Leroi AM, Koning E, Menard JF, Michot F, Denis P. Results of sphincteroplasty in 86 patients with anal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 2000;43:813–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amy L. Halverson
    • 1
  • Tracy L. Hull
    • 1
  • Maria F. Paraiso
    • 2
  • Crina Floruta
    • 1
  1. 1.From the Department of Colon and Rectal SurgeryThe Cleveland Clinic FoundationCleveland
  2. 2.the Department of GynecologyThe Cleveland Clinic FoundationCleveland

Personalised recommendations